From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: timvp@google.com, Michal Koutn?? <mkoutny@suse.com>,
rafael@kernel.org, pavel@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] sched,freezer: prevent tasks from escaping being frozen
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 12:10:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250707101019.GE1613200@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bdc5a4d3-6942-4ba2-a13d-35f2e13c0b37@huaweicloud.com>
On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 12:02:47PM +0800, Chen Ridong wrote:
> >> And I'm not quite sure I understand this hunk either. If we bail out,
> >> current->__state is reset to TASK_RUNNING, so what's the problem?
> >
> > The issue occurs in this race scenario:
> >
> > echo FROZEN > freezer.state
> > freeze_cgroup()
> > freeze_task()
> > fake_signal_wake_up() // wakes task to freeze it
> >
> > In task context:
> > get_signal
> > try_to_freeze
> > __refrigerator
> > WRITE_ONCE(current->__state, TASK_FROZEN); // set TASK_FROZEN
> > // race: cgroup state updates to frozen
I suppose this is me not quite knowing how this cgroup freezer works;
how does it race? what code marks the task frozen?
> > freezing(current) now return false
> > // We bail out, the task is not frozen but it should be frozen.
> >
> > I hope this explanation clarifies the issue I encountered.
> >
>
> Hi, Peter, Tim
>
> I was looking at the WARN_ON_ONCE(freezing(p)) check in __thaw_task
> and started wondering: since we already have !frozen(p) check, is this
> warning still needed? If we can remove it, maybe reverting commit
> cff5f49d433f ("cgroup_freezer: cgroup_freezing: Check if not frozen")
> would be a better approach.
I suppose that is possible; modern sensibilities require we write that
function something like so:
void __thaw_task(struct task_struct *p)
{
guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&freezer_lock);
if (frozen(p) && !task_call_func(p, __restore_freezer_state, NULL))
wake_up_state(p, TASK_FROZEN);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-07 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-03 13:34 [PATCH next] sched,freezer: prevent tasks from escaping being frozen Chen Ridong
2025-07-03 17:01 ` Michal Koutný
2025-07-04 3:02 ` Chen Ridong
2025-07-04 3:11 ` Chen Ridong
2025-07-04 7:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-04 10:25 ` Chen Ridong
2025-07-07 4:02 ` Chen Ridong
2025-07-07 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-07-07 11:32 ` Chen Ridong
2025-07-08 7:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-08 15:35 ` Tim Van Patten
2025-07-10 15:44 ` Michal Koutný
2025-07-11 0:51 ` Chen Ridong
2025-07-07 16:38 ` Michal Koutný
2025-07-08 1:38 ` Chen Ridong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250707101019.GE1613200@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=timvp@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.