From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26088C8303C for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 08:31:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:CC:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=UPcFzV28gTckKKGcU4nKVbu0/g6bq5ILbiLI4W2MNCQ=; b=tr5UqFosOjelS9yubE0HNyA9Xd ROT8j78EfwqSuZsqUyFAFDhLdzpXD+OnEjThFfvLnhPPUL+0qsace9A8pBECGy3979AhN9tc2QL1C H4kzxxmByMQkjhCR6fAclr/02GWPlUjguMH39V7TfvWcw8Iz60R/bzazoBWmn7anbye2hdfwPE9QU Sdbuw+w7n5IWLuhSSMYbhLqPNJ8oMx+uqkGG7iCde0mTuNXtuYtqWP3dDprb6J5zRsefuWj2AgNqI Ci1KKrTi1hOfUUGwdRxxmEKdXDTk6xVia8qmNiNG5XFqr4y3UQu5CAHpGyoEK2Ga1r3RQV2EnLdy7 eW6pwxMg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uZ3jO-00000004ktV-3elE; Tue, 08 Jul 2025 08:31:14 +0000 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uZ3el-00000004k6Y-2rLS for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2025 08:26:29 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4bbvLQ4KxZz6DB82; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 16:25:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA4B1404A9; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 16:26:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 10:26:19 +0200 Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 09:26:18 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Alireza Sanaee CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] of: add infra for finding CPU id from phandle Message-ID: <20250708092618.000067d2@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20250707150414.620-2-alireza.sanaee@huawei.com> References: <20250707150414.620-1-alireza.sanaee@huawei.com> <20250707150414.620-2-alireza.sanaee@huawei.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.203.177.66] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.67) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250708_012628_008783_3A289014 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.01 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 16:04:10 +0100 Alireza Sanaee wrote: > Get CPU id from phandle. Many drivers get do this by getting hold of CPU > node first through a phandle and then find the CPU ID using the relevant > function. This commit encapsulates cpu node finding and improves > readability. > > The API interface requires two parameters, 1) node, 2) pointer to CPU > node. API sets the pointer to the CPU node and allows the driver to play > with the CPU itself, for logging purposes for instance. > > Signed-off-by: Alireza Sanaee > --- > drivers/of/cpu.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/of.h | 9 +++++++++ > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/cpu.c b/drivers/of/cpu.c > index 5214dc3d05ae..fba17994fc20 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/cpu.c > +++ b/drivers/of/cpu.c > @@ -173,6 +173,35 @@ int of_cpu_node_to_id(struct device_node *cpu_node) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_cpu_node_to_id); > > +/** > + * of_cpu_phandle_to_id: Get the logical CPU number for a given device_node > + * > + * @node: Pointer to the device_node containing CPU phandle. > + * @cpu_np: Pointer to the device_node for CPU. > + * @cpu_idx: The index of the CPU in the list of CPUs. > + * > + * Return: The logical CPU number of the given CPU device_node or -ENODEV if > + * the CPU is not found, or if the node is NULL, it returns -1. On success, > + * cpu_np will always point to the retrieved CPU device_node with refcount > + * incremented, use of_node_put() on it when done. > + */ > +int of_cpu_phandle_to_id(const struct device_node *node, > + struct device_node **cpu_np, > + uint8_t cpu_idx) > +{ > + if (!node) > + return -1; > + > + *cpu_np = of_parse_phandle(node, "cpu", 0); Gut feeling is that it would be useful to allow a NULL cpu_np for case where they don't want the cpu device_node, just the ID. For that you'll need a local variable to hold the device_node then assign it or put it depending on whether cpu_np != NULL. Maybe there are no users for that pattern though. If that's the case then check !node || !cpu_np for that first check. > + if (!*cpu_np) > + *cpu_np = of_parse_phandle(node, "cpus", cpu_idx); > + if (!*cpu_np) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + return of_cpu_node_to_id(*cpu_np); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_cpu_phandle_to_id); > + > /** > * of_get_cpu_state_node - Get CPU's idle state node at the given index > * > diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h > index eaf0e2a2b75c..194f1cb0f6c6 100644 > --- a/include/linux/of.h > +++ b/include/linux/of.h > @@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ extern const void *of_get_property(const struct device_node *node, > extern struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu, unsigned int *thread); > extern struct device_node *of_cpu_device_node_get(int cpu); > extern int of_cpu_node_to_id(struct device_node *np); > +extern int of_cpu_phandle_to_id(const struct device_node *np, > + struct device_node **cpu_np, uint8_t cpu_idx); > extern struct device_node *of_get_next_cpu_node(struct device_node *prev); > extern struct device_node *of_get_cpu_state_node(const struct device_node *cpu_node, > int index); > @@ -662,6 +664,13 @@ static inline int of_cpu_node_to_id(struct device_node *np) > return -ENODEV; > } > > +static inline int of_cpu_phandle_to_id(const struct device_node *np, > + struct device_node **cpu_np, > + uint8_t cpu_idx) > +{ > + return -ENODEV; > +} > + > static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_cpu_node(struct device_node *prev) > { > return NULL;