From: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Sohil Mehta" <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
"Brian Gerst" <brgerst@gmail.com>,
"Patryk Wlazlyn" <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/4] x86/smpboot: moves x86_topology to static initialize and truncate
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 18:57:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250710105715.66594-4-me@linux.beauty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250710105715.66594-1-me@linux.beauty>
From: Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>
The #ifdeffery and the initializers in build_sched_topology() are just
disgusting.
Statically initialize the domain levels in the topology array and let
build_sched_topology() invalidate the package domain level when NUMA in
package is available.
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 3d0f5737a157c..309338033356f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -478,32 +478,30 @@ static int x86_cluster_flags(void)
*/
static bool x86_has_numa_in_package;
-static struct sched_domain_topology_level x86_topology[6];
-
-static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
-{
- int i = 0;
-
- x86_topology[i++] = SDTL_INIT(cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SMT);
+static struct sched_domain_topology_level x86_topology[] = {
+ SDTL_INIT(cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SMT),
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER
- x86_topology[i++] = SDTL_INIT(cpu_clustergroup_mask, x86_cluster_flags, CLS);
+ SDTL_INIT(cpu_clustergroup_mask, x86_cluster_flags, CLS),
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
- x86_topology[i++] = SDTL_INIT(cpu_coregroup_mask, x86_core_flags, MC);
+ SDTL_INIT(cpu_coregroup_mask, x86_core_flags, MC),
#endif
- /*
- * When there is NUMA topology inside the package skip the PKG domain
- * since the NUMA domains will auto-magically create the right spanning
- * domains based on the SLIT.
- */
- if (!x86_has_numa_in_package)
- x86_topology[i++] = SDTL_INIT(cpu_cpu_mask, x86_sched_itmt_flags, PKG);
+ SDTL_INIT(cpu_cpu_mask, x86_sched_itmt_flags, PKG),
+ { NULL },
+};
+static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
+{
/*
- * There must be one trailing NULL entry left.
+ * When there is NUMA topology inside the package invalidate the
+ * PKG domain since the NUMA domains will auto-magically create the
+ * right spanning domains based on the SLIT.
*/
- BUG_ON(i >= ARRAY_SIZE(x86_topology) - 1);
+ if (x86_has_numa_in_package) {
+ unsigned int pkgdom = ARRAY_SIZE(x86_topology) - 2;
+ memset(&x86_topology[pkgdom], 0, sizeof(x86_topology[pkgdom]));
+ }
set_sched_topology(x86_topology);
}
--
2.50.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-10 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-10 10:57 [PATCH v5 0/4] x86/smpboot: tidy sched-topology and drop useless SMT level Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] smpboot: introduce SDTL_INIT() helper to tidy sched topology setup Li Chen
2025-07-11 5:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-11 13:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-14 4:03 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-14 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-11 16:16 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/topology: Remove sched_domain_topology_level::flags tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-11 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] smpboot: introduce SDTL_INIT() helper to tidy sched topology setup Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] x86/smpboot: remove redundant CONFIG_SCHED_SMT Li Chen
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` Li Chen [this message]
2025-07-11 12:35 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] x86/smpboot: moves x86_topology to static initialize and truncate Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] x86/smpboot: avoid SMT domain attach/destroy if SMT is not enabled Li Chen
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-11 5:52 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] x86/smpboot: tidy sched-topology and drop useless SMT level K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250710105715.66594-4-me@linux.beauty \
--to=me@linux.beauty \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.