Re: [PATCH] rtc: efi: Add runtime check for the wakeup service capability

[Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>]

On 11/07/2025 11:26:18+1000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 at 11:06, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 at 18:41, Feng Tang <feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The kernel selftest of rtc reported a error on an ARM server which
> > > use rtc-efi device:
> > >
> > >         RUN           rtc.alarm_alm_set ...
> > >         rtctest.c:262:alarm_alm_set:Alarm time now set to 17:31:36.
> > >         rtctest.c:267:alarm_alm_set:Expected -1 (-1) != rc (-1)
> > >         alarm_alm_set: Test terminated by assertion
> > >                  FAIL  rtc.alarm_alm_set
> > >         not ok 5 rtc.alarm_alm_set
> > >
> > > The root cause is, the underlying EFI firmware doesn't support wakeup
> > > service (get/set alarm), while it doesn't have the EFI RT_PROP table
> > > either. As Ard Biesheuvel clarified [1], this breaks the UEFI spec,
> > > which requires EFI firmware to provide a 'RT_PROP' table if it doesn't
> > > support all runtime services (Section 4.6.2, UEFI spec 2.10).
> > >
> > > This issue was also reproduced on ARM server from another vendor, which
> > > doesn't have RT_PROP table either. This means, in real world, there are
> > > quite some platforms having this issue, that it doesn't support wakeup
> > > service while not providing a correct RT_PROP table, which makes it
> > > wrongly claimed to support it.
> > >
> > > Add a runtime check for the wakeup service to detect and correct this
> > > kind of cases.
> > >
> > > [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMj1kXEkzXsjm0dPhzxB+KdtzqADd4NmafKmw2rKw7mAPBrgdA@mail.gmail.com/
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/rtc/rtc-efi.c | 4 +++-
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> >
> > Thanks, I've queued this up now.
> >
> 
> Actually, we might just remove the EFI get/set wakeup time
> functionality altogether, as it seems rather pointless to me to begin
> with.
> 
> I'll send out an RFC shortly.

I guess this is going to also solve the issue reported by loongson
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/20250613061747.4117470-1-wangming01@loongson.cn/

However, please let me take care of patches in my subsystem...


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com