From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 net-next 02/14] neighbour: Move two validations from neigh_get() to neigh_valid_get_req().
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 19:06:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250711191007.3591938-3-kuniyu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250711191007.3591938-1-kuniyu@google.com>
We will remove RTNL for neigh_get() and run it under RCU instead.
neigh_get() returns -EINVAL in the following cases:
* NDA_DST is not specified
* Both ndm->ndm_ifindex and NTF_PROXY are not specified
These validations do not require RCU.
Let's move them to neigh_valid_get_req().
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
---
net/core/neighbour.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
index d35399de640d0..2c3e0f3615e20 100644
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -2938,6 +2938,12 @@ static struct ndmsg *neigh_valid_get_req(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
goto err;
}
+ if (!(ndm->ndm_flags & NTF_PROXY) && !ndm->ndm_ifindex) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "No device specified");
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
err = nlmsg_parse_deprecated_strict(nlh, sizeof(struct ndmsg), tb,
NDA_MAX, nda_policy, extack);
if (err < 0)
@@ -2951,11 +2957,14 @@ static struct ndmsg *neigh_valid_get_req(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
}
for (i = 0; i <= NDA_MAX; ++i) {
- if (!tb[i])
- continue;
-
switch (i) {
case NDA_DST:
+ if (!tb[i]) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Network address not specified");
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
if (nla_len(tb[i]) != (int)(*tbl)->key_len) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid network address in neighbor get request");
err = -EINVAL;
@@ -2964,6 +2973,9 @@ static struct ndmsg *neigh_valid_get_req(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
*dst = nla_data(tb[i]);
break;
default:
+ if (!tb[i])
+ continue;
+
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Unsupported attribute in neighbor get request");
err = -EINVAL;
goto err;
@@ -3059,11 +3071,6 @@ static int neigh_get(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
}
}
- if (!dst) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Network address not specified");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
if (ndm->ndm_flags & NTF_PROXY) {
struct pneigh_entry *pn;
@@ -3076,11 +3083,6 @@ static int neigh_get(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
nlh->nlmsg_seq, tbl);
}
- if (!dev) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "No device specified");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
neigh = neigh_lookup(tbl, dst, dev);
if (!neigh) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Neighbour entry not found");
--
2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-11 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-11 19:06 [PATCH v1 net-next 00/14] neighbour: Convert RTM_GETNEIGH to RCU and make pneigh RTNL-free Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 19:06 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 01/14] neighbour: Make neigh_valid_get_req() return ndmsg Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 19:06 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2025-07-11 19:06 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 03/14] neighbour: Allocate skb in neigh_get() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 19:06 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 04/14] neighbour: Move neigh_find_table() to neigh_get() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 19:06 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 05/14] neighbour: Split pneigh_lookup() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 19:06 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 06/14] neighbour: Free pneigh_entry after RCU grace period Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-12 15:01 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-12 18:07 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-14 10:56 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-12 17:14 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-11 19:06 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 07/14] neighbour: Annotate access to struct pneigh_entry.{flags,protocol} Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 19:06 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 08/14] neighbour: Convert RTM_GETNEIGH to RCU Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 19:06 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 09/14] neighbour: Drop read_lock_bh(&tbl->lock) in pneigh_dump_table() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 19:06 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 10/14] neighbour: Use rcu_dereference() in pneigh_get_{first,next}() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 19:06 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 11/14] neighbour: Remove __pneigh_lookup() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 19:06 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 12/14] neighbour: Drop read_lock_bh(&tbl->lock) in pneigh_lookup() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 19:06 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 13/14] neighbour: Protect tbl->phash_buckets[] with a dedicated mutex Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 19:06 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 14/14] neighbour: Update pneigh_entry in pneigh_create() Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250711191007.3591938-3-kuniyu@google.com \
--to=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.