All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>, "Tingmao Wang" <m@maowtm.org>
Cc: "Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Ben Scarlato" <akhna@google.com>,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Burgener" <dburgener@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>, "Jeff Xu" <jeffxu@google.com>,
	NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>, "Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/landlock: Add tests for access through disconnected paths
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 21:19:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250711191938.2007175-3-mic@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250711191938.2007175-1-mic@digikod.net>

From: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org>

This adds tests for the edge case discussed in [1], with specific ones
for rename and link operations when the operands are through
disconnected paths, as that go through a separate code path in Landlock.

This has resulted in a warning, due to collect_domain_accesses() not
expecting to reach a different root from path->mnt:

  #  RUN           layout1_bind.path_disconnected ...
  #            OK  layout1_bind.path_disconnected
  ok 96 layout1_bind.path_disconnected
  #  RUN           layout1_bind.path_disconnected_rename ...
  [..] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [..] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 385 at security/landlock/fs.c:1065 collect_domain_accesses
  [..] ...
  [..] RIP: 0010:collect_domain_accesses (security/landlock/fs.c:1065 (discriminator 2) security/landlock/fs.c:1031 (discriminator 2))
  [..] current_check_refer_path (security/landlock/fs.c:1205)
  [..] ...
  [..] hook_path_rename (security/landlock/fs.c:1526)
  [..] security_path_rename (security/security.c:2026 (discriminator 1))
  [..] do_renameat2 (fs/namei.c:5264)
  #            OK  layout1_bind.path_disconnected_rename
  ok 97 layout1_bind.path_disconnected_rename

Move the const char definitions a bit above so that we can use the path
for s4d1 in cleanup code.

Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/027d5190-b37a-40a8-84e9-4ccbc352bcdf@maowtm.org [1]
Signed-off-by: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
---

Changes since v1:
- Integrate this patch into my patch series, and change the result for
  two tests with updated comments.  Diff here:
  https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250701183812.3201231-2-mic@digikod.net
- Replace most ASSERT with EXPECT, add extra checks, massage commit
  message and comments.
- Squash Tingmao's patches:
  https://lore.kernel.org/r/09b24128f86973a6022e6aa8338945fcfb9a33e4.1749925391.git.m@maowtm.org
  https://lore.kernel.org/r/8ed0bfcd-aefa-44bd-86b6-e12583779187@maowtm.org
  https://lore.kernel.org/r/3080e512-64b0-42cf-b379-8f52cfeff78a@maowtm.org
---
 tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c | 405 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 402 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
index fa0f18ec62c4..5312698927ea 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
@@ -4561,6 +4561,18 @@ TEST_F_FORK(ioctl, handle_file_access_file)
 FIXTURE(layout1_bind) {};
 /* clang-format on */
 
+static const char bind_dir_s1d3[] = TMP_DIR "/s2d1/s2d2/s1d3";
+static const char bind_file1_s1d3[] = TMP_DIR "/s2d1/s2d2/s1d3/f1";
+
+/* Move targets for disconnected path tests. */
+static const char dir_s4d1[] = TMP_DIR "/s4d1";
+static const char file1_s4d1[] = TMP_DIR "/s4d1/f1";
+static const char file2_s4d1[] = TMP_DIR "/s4d1/f2";
+static const char dir_s4d2[] = TMP_DIR "/s4d1/s4d2";
+static const char file1_s4d2[] = TMP_DIR "/s4d1/s4d2/f1";
+static const char file1_name[] = "f1";
+static const char file2_name[] = "f2";
+
 FIXTURE_SETUP(layout1_bind)
 {
 	prepare_layout(_metadata);
@@ -4576,14 +4588,14 @@ FIXTURE_TEARDOWN_PARENT(layout1_bind)
 {
 	/* umount(dir_s2d2)) is handled by namespace lifetime. */
 
+	remove_path(file1_s4d1);
+	remove_path(file2_s4d1);
+
 	remove_layout1(_metadata);
 
 	cleanup_layout(_metadata);
 }
 
-static const char bind_dir_s1d3[] = TMP_DIR "/s2d1/s2d2/s1d3";
-static const char bind_file1_s1d3[] = TMP_DIR "/s2d1/s2d2/s1d3/f1";
-
 /*
  * layout1_bind hierarchy:
  *
@@ -4806,6 +4818,393 @@ TEST_F_FORK(layout1_bind, reparent_cross_mount)
 	ASSERT_EQ(0, rename(bind_file1_s1d3, file1_s2d2));
 }
 
+/*
+ * Make sure access to file through a disconnected path works as expected.
+ * This test moves s1d3 to s4d1.
+ */
+TEST_F_FORK(layout1_bind, path_disconnected)
+{
+	const struct rule layer1_allow_all[] = {
+		{
+			.path = TMP_DIR,
+			.access = ACCESS_ALL,
+		},
+		{},
+	};
+	const struct rule layer2_allow_just_f1[] = {
+		{
+			.path = file1_s1d3,
+			.access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE,
+		},
+		{},
+	};
+	const struct rule layer3_only_s1d2[] = {
+		{
+			.path = dir_s1d2,
+			.access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE,
+		},
+		{},
+	};
+
+	/* Landlock should not deny access just because it is disconnected. */
+	int ruleset_fd_l1 =
+		create_ruleset(_metadata, ACCESS_ALL, layer1_allow_all);
+
+	/* Creates the new ruleset now before we move the dir containing the file. */
+	int ruleset_fd_l2 =
+		create_ruleset(_metadata, ACCESS_RW, layer2_allow_just_f1);
+	int ruleset_fd_l3 =
+		create_ruleset(_metadata, ACCESS_RW, layer3_only_s1d2);
+	int bind_s1d3_fd;
+
+	ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd_l1);
+	ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd_l2);
+	ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd_l3);
+
+	enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd_l1);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd_l1));
+
+	bind_s1d3_fd = open(bind_dir_s1d3, O_PATH | O_CLOEXEC);
+	ASSERT_LE(0, bind_s1d3_fd);
+
+	/* Tests access is possible before we move. */
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name, O_RDONLY));
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, file2_name, O_RDONLY));
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, "..", O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY));
+
+	/* Makes it disconnected. */
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, rename(dir_s1d3, dir_s4d1))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to rename %s to %s: %s", dir_s1d3, dir_s4d1,
+		       strerror(errno));
+	}
+
+	/* Tests that access is still possible. */
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name, O_RDONLY));
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, file2_name, O_RDONLY));
+
+	/*
+	 * Tests that ".." is not possible (not because of Landlock, but just
+	 * because it's disconnected).
+	 */
+	EXPECT_EQ(ENOENT,
+		  test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, "..", O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY));
+
+	/* This should still work with a narrower rule. */
+	enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd_l2);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd_l2));
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s4d1, O_RDONLY));
+	/*
+	 * Accessing a file through a disconnected file descriptor is not allowed
+	 * when it is no longer visible in its mount point.
+	 */
+	EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name, O_RDONLY));
+	EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, file2_name, O_RDONLY));
+
+	/*
+	 * But if we only allow access to under the original dir, then it
+	 * should be denied.
+	 */
+	enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd_l3);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd_l3));
+	EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s4d1, O_RDONLY));
+	EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name, O_RDONLY));
+	EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, file2_name, O_RDONLY));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that renameat with disconnected paths works under Landlock.  This test
+ * moves s1d3 to s4d2, so that we can have a rule allowing refers on the move
+ * target's immediate parent.
+ */
+TEST_F_FORK(layout1_bind, path_disconnected_rename)
+{
+	const struct rule layer1[] = {
+		{
+			.path = dir_s1d2,
+			.access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_DIR |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_DIR |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_REG |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_FILE |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE,
+		},
+		{
+			.path = dir_s4d1,
+			.access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_DIR |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_DIR |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_REG |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_FILE |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE,
+		},
+		{}
+	};
+
+	/* This layer only handles LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE. */
+	const struct rule layer2_only_s1d2[] = {
+		{
+			.path = dir_s1d2,
+			.access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE,
+		},
+		{},
+	};
+	int ruleset_fd_l1, ruleset_fd_l2;
+	pid_t child_pid;
+	int bind_s1d3_fd, status;
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, mkdir(dir_s4d1, 0755))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to create %s: %s", dir_s4d1, strerror(errno));
+	}
+	ruleset_fd_l1 = create_ruleset(_metadata, ACCESS_ALL, layer1);
+	ruleset_fd_l2 = create_ruleset(_metadata, LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE,
+				       layer2_only_s1d2);
+	ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd_l1);
+	ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd_l2);
+
+	enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd_l1);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd_l1));
+
+	bind_s1d3_fd = open(bind_dir_s1d3, O_PATH | O_CLOEXEC);
+	ASSERT_LE(0, bind_s1d3_fd);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name, O_RDONLY));
+
+	/* Tests ENOENT priority over EACCES for disconnected directory. */
+	EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, "..", O_DIRECTORY));
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, rename(dir_s1d3, dir_s4d2))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to rename %s to %s: %s", dir_s1d3, dir_s4d2,
+		       strerror(errno));
+	}
+	EXPECT_EQ(ENOENT, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, "..", O_DIRECTORY));
+
+	/*
+	 * The file is no longer under s1d2 but we should still be able to access it
+	 * with layer 2 because its mount point is evaluated as the first valid
+	 * directory because it was initially a parent.  Do a fork to test this so
+	 * we don't prevent ourselves from renaming it back later.
+	 */
+	child_pid = fork();
+	ASSERT_LE(0, child_pid);
+	if (child_pid == 0) {
+		enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd_l2);
+		EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd_l2));
+		EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name, O_RDONLY));
+		EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s4d2, O_RDONLY));
+
+		/*
+		 * Tests that access widening checks indeed prevents us from renaming it
+		 * back.
+		 */
+		EXPECT_EQ(-1, rename(dir_s4d2, dir_s1d3));
+		EXPECT_EQ(EXDEV, errno);
+
+		/*
+		 * Including through the now disconnected fd (but it should return
+		 * EXDEV).
+		 */
+		EXPECT_EQ(-1, renameat(bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name, AT_FDCWD,
+				       file1_s2d2));
+		EXPECT_EQ(EXDEV, errno);
+		_exit(_metadata->exit_code);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(child_pid, waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0));
+	EXPECT_EQ(1, WIFEXITED(status));
+	EXPECT_EQ(EXIT_SUCCESS, WEXITSTATUS(status));
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, rename(dir_s4d2, dir_s1d3))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to rename %s back to %s: %s", dir_s4d1, dir_s1d3,
+		       strerror(errno));
+	}
+
+	/* Now checks that we can access it under l2. */
+	child_pid = fork();
+	ASSERT_LE(0, child_pid);
+	if (child_pid == 0) {
+		enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd_l2);
+		EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd_l2));
+		EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name, O_RDONLY));
+		EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s1d3, O_RDONLY));
+		_exit(_metadata->exit_code);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(child_pid, waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0));
+	EXPECT_EQ(1, WIFEXITED(status));
+	EXPECT_EQ(EXIT_SUCCESS, WEXITSTATUS(status));
+
+	/*
+	 * Also test that we can rename via a disconnected path.  We move the
+	 * dir back to the disconnected place first, then we rename file1 to
+	 * file2 through our dir fd.
+	 */
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, rename(dir_s1d3, dir_s4d2))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to rename %s to %s: %s", dir_s1d3, dir_s4d2,
+		       strerror(errno));
+	}
+	ASSERT_EQ(0,
+		  renameat(bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name, bind_s1d3_fd, file2_name))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to rename %s to %s within disconnected %s: %s",
+		       file1_name, file2_name, bind_dir_s1d3, strerror(errno));
+	}
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, file2_name, O_RDONLY));
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, renameat(bind_s1d3_fd, file2_name, AT_FDCWD, file1_s2d2))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to rename %s to %s through disconnected %s: %s",
+		       file2_name, file1_s2d2, bind_dir_s1d3, strerror(errno));
+	}
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s2d2, O_RDONLY));
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s1d2, O_RDONLY));
+
+	/* Move it back using the disconnected path as the target. */
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, renameat(AT_FDCWD, file1_s2d2, bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to rename %s to %s through disconnected %s: %s",
+		       file1_s1d2, file1_name, bind_dir_s1d3, strerror(errno));
+	}
+
+	/* Now make it connected again. */
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, rename(dir_s4d2, dir_s1d3))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to rename %s back to %s: %s", dir_s4d2, dir_s1d3,
+		       strerror(errno));
+	}
+
+	/* Checks again that we can access it under l2. */
+	enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd_l2);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd_l2));
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name, O_RDONLY));
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s1d3, O_RDONLY));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that linkat(2) with disconnected paths works under Landlock. This
+ * test moves s1d3 to s4d1.
+ */
+TEST_F_FORK(layout1_bind, path_disconnected_link)
+{
+	/* Ruleset to be applied after renaming s1d3 to s4d1. */
+	const struct rule layer1[] = {
+		{
+			.path = dir_s4d1,
+			.access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_REG |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_FILE,
+		},
+		{
+			.path = dir_s2d2,
+			.access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_REG |
+				  LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_FILE,
+		},
+		{}
+	};
+	int ruleset_fd, bind_s1d3_fd;
+
+	/* Removes unneeded files created by layout1, otherwise it will EEXIST. */
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, unlink(file1_s1d2));
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, unlink(file2_s1d3));
+
+	bind_s1d3_fd = open(bind_dir_s1d3, O_PATH | O_CLOEXEC);
+	ASSERT_LE(0, bind_s1d3_fd);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name, O_RDONLY));
+
+	/* Disconnects bind_s1d3_fd. */
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, rename(dir_s1d3, dir_s4d1))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to rename %s to %s: %s", dir_s1d3, dir_s4d1,
+		       strerror(errno));
+	}
+
+	/* Need this later to test different parent link. */
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, mkdir(dir_s4d2, 0755))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to create %s: %s", dir_s4d2, strerror(errno));
+	}
+
+	ruleset_fd = create_ruleset(_metadata, ACCESS_ALL, layer1);
+	ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
+	enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
+
+	/* From disconnected to connected. */
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, linkat(bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name, AT_FDCWD, file1_s2d2, 0))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to link %s to %s via disconnected %s: %s",
+		       file1_name, file1_s2d2, bind_dir_s1d3, strerror(errno));
+	}
+
+	/* Tests that we can access via the new link... */
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s2d2, O_RDONLY))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to open newly linked %s: %s", file1_s2d2,
+		       strerror(errno));
+	}
+
+	/* ...as well as the old one. */
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s4d1, O_RDONLY))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to open original %s: %s", file1_s4d1,
+		       strerror(errno));
+	}
+
+	/* From connected to disconnected. */
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, unlink(file1_s4d1));
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, linkat(AT_FDCWD, file1_s2d2, bind_s1d3_fd, file2_name, 0))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to link %s to %s via disconnected %s: %s",
+		       file1_s2d2, file2_name, bind_dir_s1d3, strerror(errno));
+	}
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open(file2_s4d1, O_RDONLY));
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, unlink(file1_s2d2));
+
+	/* From disconnected to disconnected (same parent). */
+	ASSERT_EQ(0,
+		  linkat(bind_s1d3_fd, file2_name, bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name, 0))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to link %s to %s within disconnected %s: %s",
+		       file2_name, file1_name, bind_dir_s1d3, strerror(errno));
+	}
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s4d1, O_RDONLY))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to open newly linked %s: %s", file1_s4d1,
+		       strerror(errno));
+	}
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name, O_RDONLY))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to open %s through newly created link under disconnected path: %s",
+		       file1_name, strerror(errno));
+	}
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, unlink(file2_s4d1));
+
+	/* From disconnected to disconnected (different parent). */
+	ASSERT_EQ(0,
+		  linkat(bind_s1d3_fd, file1_name, bind_s1d3_fd, "s4d2/f1", 0))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to link %s to %s within disconnected %s: %s",
+		       file1_name, "s4d2/f1", bind_dir_s1d3, strerror(errno));
+	}
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s4d2, O_RDONLY))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to open %s after link: %s", file1_s4d2,
+		       strerror(errno));
+	}
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, test_open_rel(bind_s1d3_fd, "s4d2/f1", O_RDONLY))
+	{
+		TH_LOG("Failed to open %s through disconnected path after link: %s",
+		       "s4d2/f1", strerror(errno));
+	}
+}
+
 #define LOWER_BASE TMP_DIR "/lower"
 #define LOWER_DATA LOWER_BASE "/data"
 static const char lower_fl1[] = LOWER_DATA "/fl1";
-- 
2.50.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-11 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-11 19:19 [PATCH v2 0/3] Landlock: Disconnected directory handling Mickaël Salaün
2025-07-11 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] landlock: Fix handling of disconnected directories Mickaël Salaün
2025-07-14 12:39   ` Tingmao Wang
2025-07-15 18:52     ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-07-19 10:19       ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-07-17 17:32     ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-07-11 19:19 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2025-07-11 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/landlock: Add disconnected leafs and branch test suites Mickaël Salaün

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250711191938.2007175-3-mic@digikod.net \
    --to=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=akhna@google.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dburgener@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jeffxu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m@maowtm.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.