From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84A928F5B for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 07:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752304572; cv=none; b=Q0ymCCXWjgiW2sFCKOZbG4qhM4Ary47nUUpjF1tiwpDuIrM2N1nWG4GVKpNeEj9CFChUiR53xw3GRzEeVp4eMWc6yma/Azx7kLZmaYQC1yPgl7fGnfmmvmlImlCsqeyFJkVuN6bEz4AV25fVToT5UOEs7EFnyUZU98IJsTEX7OY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752304572; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ccUGgpTtBWfx37KY/Uzcs3cK27ss52L0tc5huxtF148=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lMlQ/ctGuJnCyw+0UO1tujonJik2onzpBhKkTuIzwOzR8VjVOfEJpJhucn3JHj99sX6P2WmmokT6yiplPwogw0EQVvP9V5bDUqh7bC4rK/mn0401hFRlB+1iYP2v2698HEIIGXwqwQem6ybevdkX7w2EEhnZsLpaYiWr+UmiDkI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=dcKcrLCt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="dcKcrLCt" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1752304570; x=1783840570; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ccUGgpTtBWfx37KY/Uzcs3cK27ss52L0tc5huxtF148=; b=dcKcrLCtoV0/z8kTuzS+L6qzqBdIGsykoc+ihdAFt5BLye/Lr+aWJ7pA h/RNuJGrqRMpmR/NUyaoaUhiegf/ePJZ9PhEteDKt+BTLbL244V0BQBRa imwv2UmFP+n5ekNFdl1bzbr8rNy4c80Sr49vLGkwlaId0uxdG1rjZt5cT gdlknOkIfKCZ/62zwGWdjxh/3rcp4gTXoYnFHEwdIkCP53p4sNYQDZG9W XpRzLUPRY0hZSW9S3+V94P/NVzcidV7mz/xN6VbJz/VnIR/HfWRq3VGYp Dnuo6XL7SyElTITiVZQsx4X2pqr+HGQP0E79ECvvuw2yHQXg+dnX6QJu0 A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: mFyHYvbmRGWf9+HbTZUhXA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7wXj87MXQveDU9uAjiubQg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11491"; a="65939817" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,306,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="65939817" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Jul 2025 00:16:09 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: duN+jBTASt+t5WOj8eGv0A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HtwRbzoGR0uOqn9NWLOJ9A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,306,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="157255921" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 9ee84586c615) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2025 00:16:09 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 9ee84586c615 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uaUSt-00078F-0N; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 07:16:07 +0000 Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 15:16:00 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Sasha Levin Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC v3 2/4] kernel/api: enable kerneldoc-based API specifications Message-ID: <202507121502.xau4FnHY-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250711114248.2288591-3-sashal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250711114248.2288591-3-sashal@kernel.org> Hi Sasha, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on uml/next] [also build test WARNING on uml/fixes tip/x86/core masahiroy-kbuild/for-next masahiroy-kbuild/fixes akpm-mm/mm-everything tip/sched/core linus/master v6.16-rc5 next-20250711] [cannot apply to arnd-asm-generic/master] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sasha-Levin/kernel-api-introduce-kernel-API-specification-framework/20250711-194622 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/uml/linux next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250711114248.2288591-3-sashal%40kernel.org patch subject: [RFC v3 2/4] kernel/api: enable kerneldoc-based API specifications config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-002-20250712 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250712/202507121502.xau4FnHY-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-12) 11.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250712/202507121502.xau4FnHY-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507121502.xau4FnHY-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> Warning: sound/soc/samsung/pcm.c:131 struct member 'lock' not described in 's3c_pcm_info' -- >> Warning: sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c:83 struct member 'lock' not described in 'fsl_esai' -- >> Warning: sound/soc/stm/stm32_spdifrx.c:248 struct member 'lock' not described in 'stm32_spdifrx_data' -- >> Warning: drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c:162 struct member 'lock' not described in 'mlx90632_data' -- >> Warning: drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90635.c:133 struct member 'lock' not described in 'mlx90635_data' -- >> Warning: drivers/virtio/virtio_rtc_driver.c:37 struct member 'lock' not described in 'viortc_vq' >> Warning: drivers/virtio/virtio_rtc_driver.c:1137 function parameter 'lock' not described in 'viortc_populate_vq' -- >> Warning: drivers/iio/magnetometer/ak8974.c:201 struct member 'lock' not described in 'ak8974' -- >> Warning: kernel/locking/qrwlock.c:21 function parameter 'lock' not described in 'queued_read_lock_slowpath' >> Warning: kernel/locking/qrwlock.c:66 function parameter 'lock' not described in 'queued_write_lock_slowpath' -- >> Warning: kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:130 function parameter 'lock' not described in 'queued_spin_lock_slowpath' -- >> Warning: drivers/gpio/gpio-graniterapids.c:66 struct member 'lock' not described in 'gnr_gpio' -- >> Warning: drivers/iio/dac/ad5758.c:121 struct member 'lock' not described in 'ad5758_state' .. -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki