Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/5] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: add AF_XDP zero copy support

[Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>]

On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 14:50:05 +0530 Malladi, Meghana wrote:
> > AF_XDP performance using 64 byte packets in Kpps.
> > Benchmark:	XDP-SKB		XDP-Native	XDP-Native(ZeroCopy)
> > rxdrop		317		504		824
> > txonly		400		405		757
> > l2fwd 		207		264		0
> > 
> > AF_XDP performance using 1500 byte packets in Kpps.
> > Benchmark:	XDP-SKB		XDP-Native	XDP-Native(ZeroCopy)
> > rxdrop		82		82		82
> > txonly		82		82		82
> > l2fwd 		82		82		82
> > 
> > [1]: https://github.com/xdp-project/bpf-examples/tree/master/AF_XDP-example
> > 
> > To:
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>  
> 
> This series crashes Linux on am64xx-hsevm, when I tried nfs boot using 
> AM65-CPSW-NUSS driver:
> logs: 
> https://gist.github.com/MeghanaMalladiTI/d655a1c8ca88113ee7f5f57d6ab0ec4c
> 
> Seems like you have reverted the fix for the same bug which was reported 
> by Siddharth and fixed by Julien: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/7f7fb71a-6d15-46f1-b63c-b569a2e230b7@baylibre.com/
> 
> reverted lines:
> 		if (!common->ports[port].ndev)
> 		/* FIXME should we BUG here? */
> 			continue;
> 
> Can you please take a look at it.

Just to be clear -- you're reporting this problem to Roger so that its
fixed before the series is reposted? I don't see this in the tree, I
wanted to make sure it's not something I need to track as a regression.