From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>,
Martin Karsten <mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] eventpoll: Fix priority inversion problem
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 12:14:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250714101410.Su0CwBrb@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250714-leumund-sinnen-44309048c53d@brauner>
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 10:59:58AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> My lesson from this is that touching epoll without a really really good
> and urgent reason always end up a complete mess. So going forward we'll
> just be very careful here.
And my lesson is that lockless is hard. I still have no clue what is the
bug in this patch.
I am implementing a new solution now, completely ditching this old
approach. It survives some basic testing, and the numbers look promising. I
may post it later this week.
Nam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-14 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-27 9:08 [PATCH v3] eventpoll: Fix priority inversion problem Nam Cao
2025-05-30 5:08 ` Christian Brauner
2025-06-25 15:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-06-26 13:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-06-26 13:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-06-25 14:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-06-25 15:27 ` Nam Cao
2025-06-25 15:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-06-25 15:57 ` Nam Cao
2025-06-25 16:02 ` Nam Cao
2025-06-26 15:23 ` John Ogness
2025-06-26 15:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-06-26 15:56 ` Nam Cao
2025-06-30 15:08 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-01 20:33 ` Florian Bezdeka
2025-07-01 12:03 ` Christian Brauner
2025-07-10 3:08 ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-07-10 3:48 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-10 4:06 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-10 4:10 ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-07-10 6:21 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-10 6:54 ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-07-10 8:32 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-10 9:47 ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-07-11 5:02 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-11 9:44 ` Christian Brauner
2025-07-11 9:48 ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-07-11 9:58 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-11 12:09 ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-07-11 12:21 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-12 0:09 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-12 8:54 ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-07-11 9:50 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-14 8:59 ` Christian Brauner
2025-07-14 10:14 ` Nam Cao [this message]
2025-07-15 9:37 ` Yann Ylavic
2025-07-15 10:08 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-14 16:16 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250714101410.Su0CwBrb@linutronix.de \
--to=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=xry111@xry111.site \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.