From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, lee@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
broonie@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] regulator: Add support for MediaTek MT6363 SPMI PMIC Regulators
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 10:16:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202507150934.VLFQsCyK-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250707134451.154346-5-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Hi AngeloGioacchino,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on broonie-regulator/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on lee-mfd/for-mfd-next lee-mfd/for-mfd-fixes lee-leds/for-leds-next linus/master v6.16-rc6 next-20250714]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/AngeloGioacchino-Del-Regno/dt-bindings-regulator-Document-MediaTek-MT6316-PMIC-Regulators/20250707-214911
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250707134451.154346-5-angelogioacchino.delregno%40collabora.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 4/8] regulator: Add support for MediaTek MT6363 SPMI PMIC Regulators
config: openrisc-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250715/202507150934.VLFQsCyK-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250715/202507150934.VLFQsCyK-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507150934.VLFQsCyK-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/regulator/mt6363-regulator.c: In function 'mt6363_vemc_set_voltage_sel':
>> drivers/regulator/mt6363-regulator.c:457:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_PREP' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
457 | sel = FIELD_PREP(MT6363_RG_VEMC_VOSEL_1_MASK, sel);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/regulator/mt6363-regulator.c: In function 'mt6363_vemc_get_voltage_sel':
>> drivers/regulator/mt6363-regulator.c:489:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_GET' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
489 | ret = FIELD_GET(MT6363_RG_VEMC_VOSEL_1_MASK, sel);
| ^~~~~~~~~
vim +/FIELD_PREP +457 drivers/regulator/mt6363-regulator.c
432
433 static int mt6363_vemc_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int sel)
434 {
435 const u16 tma_unlock_key = MT6363_TMA_UNLOCK_VALUE;
436 struct regmap *regmap = rdev->regmap;
437 unsigned int val;
438 u16 mask;
439 int ret;
440
441 ret = regmap_read(rdev->regmap, MT6363_TOP_TRAP, &val);
442 if (ret)
443 return ret;
444
445 if (val > 1)
446 return -EINVAL;
447
448 /* Unlock TMA for writing */
449 ret = regmap_bulk_write(rdev->regmap, MT6363_TOP_TMA_KEY_L,
450 &tma_unlock_key, sizeof(tma_unlock_key));
451 if (ret)
452 return ret;
453
454 /* If HW trapping value is 1, use VEMC_VOSEL_1 instead of VEMC_VOSEL_0 */
455 if (val == 1) {
456 mask = MT6363_RG_VEMC_VOSEL_1_MASK;
> 457 sel = FIELD_PREP(MT6363_RG_VEMC_VOSEL_1_MASK, sel);
458 } else {
459 mask = rdev->desc->vsel_mask;
460 }
461
462 /* Function must return the result of this write operation */
463 ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, rdev->desc->vsel_reg, mask, sel);
464
465 /* Unconditionally re-lock TMA */
466 val = 0;
467 regmap_bulk_write(rdev->regmap, MT6363_TOP_TMA_KEY_L, &val, 2);
468
469 return ret;
470 }
471
472 static int mt6363_vemc_get_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
473 {
474 unsigned int sel, trap;
475 int ret;
476
477 ret = regmap_read(rdev->regmap, rdev->desc->vsel_reg, &sel);
478 if (ret)
479 return ret;
480
481 ret = regmap_read(rdev->regmap, MT6363_TOP_TRAP, &trap);
482 if (ret)
483 return ret;
484
485 /* If HW trapping value is 1, use VEMC_VOSEL_1 instead of VEMC_VOSEL_0 */
486 if (trap > 1)
487 return -EINVAL;
488 else if (trap == 1)
> 489 ret = FIELD_GET(MT6363_RG_VEMC_VOSEL_1_MASK, sel);
490 else
491 ret = sel & rdev->desc->vsel_mask;
492
493 return ret;
494 }
495
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-07 13:44 [PATCH v2 0/8] Add support MT6316/6363/MT6373 PMICs regulators and MFD AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: regulator: Document MediaTek MT6316 PMIC Regulators AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-08 19:22 ` Rob Herring
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] regulator: Add support for MediaTek MT6316 SPMI " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] dt-bindings: regulator: Document MediaTek MT6363 " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-08 4:09 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] regulator: Add support for MediaTek MT6363 SPMI " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-08 4:57 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2025-07-15 2:16 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] dt-bindings: regulator: Document MediaTek MT6373 " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] regulator: Add support for MediaTek MT6373 SPMI " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] dt-bindings: mfd: Add binding for MediaTek MT6363 series SPMI PMIC AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-07 16:05 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-07-08 19:31 ` Rob Herring
2025-07-07 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] drivers: mfd: Add support for MediaTek SPMI PMICs and MT6363/73 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202507150934.VLFQsCyK-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.