From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Alison Schofield" <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] cxl: Convert to ACQUIRE() for conditional rwsem locking
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 17:20:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250715172035.00007f96@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250711234932.671292-9-dan.j.williams@intel.com>
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 16:49:32 -0700
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> Use ACQUIRE() to cleanup conditional locking paths in the CXL driver
> The ACQUIRE() macro and its associated ACQUIRE_ERR() helpers, like
> scoped_cond_guard(), arrange for scoped-based conditional locking. Unlike
> scoped_cond_guard(), these macros arrange for an ERR_PTR() to be retrieved
> representing the state of the conditional lock.
>
> The goal of this conversion is to complete the removal of all explicit
> unlock calls in the subsystem. I.e. the methods to acquire a lock are
> solely via guard(), scoped_guard() (for limited cases), or ACQUIRE(). All
> unlock is implicit / scope-based. In order to make sure all lock sites are
> converted, the existing rwsem's are consolidated and renamed in 'struct
> cxl_rwsem'. While that makes the patch noisier it gives a clean cut-off
> between old-world (explicit unlock allowed), and new world (explicit unlock
> deleted).
>
> Cc: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Cc: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Two trivial comments inline.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index 4314aaed8ad8..ad60c93be803 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> static int attach_target(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
> struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled, int pos,
> unsigned int state)
> {
> - int rc = 0;
> -
> - if (state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
> - rc = down_write_killable(&cxl_region_rwsem);
> - else
> - down_write(&cxl_region_rwsem);
> - if (rc)
> - return rc;
> -
> - down_read(&cxl_dpa_rwsem);
> - rc = cxl_region_attach(cxlr, cxled, pos);
> - up_read(&cxl_dpa_rwsem);
> - up_write(&cxl_region_rwsem);
> + int rc = __attach_target(cxlr, cxled, pos, state);
>
... (start of block for next comment)
> - if (rc)
> - dev_warn(cxled->cxld.dev.parent,
> - "failed to attach %s to %s: %d\n",
> - dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), dev_name(&cxlr->dev), rc);
> + if (rc == 0)
> + return 0;
>
> + dev_warn(cxled->cxld.dev.parent, "failed to attach %s to %s: %d\n",
> + dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), dev_name(&cxlr->dev), rc);
I'm not seeing a reason for this change. I prefer the original
with the error path as the out of line case.
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -3592,30 +3552,23 @@ static int cxl_region_can_probe(struct cxl_region *cxlr)
...
> if (test_bit(CXL_REGION_F_NEEDS_RESET, &cxlr->flags)) {
> dev_err(&cxlr->dev,
> "failed to activate, re-commit region and retry\n");
> - rc = -ENXIO;
> - goto out;
> + return -ENXIO;
return dev_err_probe(&cxlr->dev, -ENXIO,
"failed to activate, re-commit region and retry\n");
perhaps. I always like the cleanup.h stuff enabling this as it improves the patch
line count no end ;)
> }
>
> -out:
> - up_read(&cxl_region_rwsem);
> -
> - if (rc)
> - return rc;
> return 0;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-11 23:49 [PATCH v3 0/8] cleanup: Introduce ACQUIRE(), a guard() for conditional locks Dan Williams
2025-07-11 23:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] cleanup: Introduce ACQUIRE() and ACQUIRE_ERR() " Dan Williams
2025-07-15 15:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-11 23:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] cxl/mbox: Convert poison list mutex to ACQUIRE() Dan Williams
2025-07-11 23:49 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] cxl/decoder: Move decoder register programming to a helper Dan Williams
2025-07-11 23:49 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] cxl/decoder: Drop pointless locking Dan Williams
2025-07-11 23:49 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] cxl/region: Split commit_store() into __commit() and queue_reset() helpers Dan Williams
2025-07-14 21:49 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2025-07-11 23:49 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] cxl/region: Move ready-to-probe state check to a helper Dan Williams
2025-07-14 22:02 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2025-07-15 15:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-15 17:08 ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-11 23:49 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] cxl/region: Consolidate cxl_decoder_kill_region() and cxl_region_detach() Dan Williams
2025-07-14 18:17 ` Dave Jiang
2025-07-15 17:07 ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-14 22:09 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2025-07-15 15:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-15 16:44 ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-16 10:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-11 23:49 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] cxl: Convert to ACQUIRE() for conditional rwsem locking Dan Williams
2025-07-14 16:28 ` Shiju Jose
2025-07-14 19:21 ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-14 18:39 ` Dave Jiang
2025-07-14 22:12 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2025-07-15 16:20 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-07-15 17:13 ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-15 17:38 ` Dave Jiang
2025-07-16 20:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] cleanup: Introduce ACQUIRE(), a guard() for conditional locks Dave Jiang
2025-07-30 15:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-01 18:49 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-01 19:02 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-08-01 23:51 ` dan.j.williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250715172035.00007f96@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.