From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 396D31FECB0 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2025 12:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752667209; cv=none; b=R8uqZZ934qNrL+LvQGHqcpazB3yhm0bVTdUivn/IDWtlj+YuYS1TQLnwaY9LNAlxeoQ+jw6MlQBE1AHZ7un24l+Kysrj1X+7POs4ryVoRO4nm1QXAPzY8GA+lHA5SClgahMP1Hze6qiBRlXotmFCv9zrtpris52kZNnA0BCOXhE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752667209; c=relaxed/simple; bh=REfYG0y1V5JUVC4Q7wIXUcib7iF+kuVZMdibeSMEPlQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sU2l/02mAFZowLTOQpGxcfcZlJeBASZLYh1mLw6JQ3lTPNs6XpmOJm4a3jcKo8FELfU2y54J+aUWOo0SeP3/vEfpdrJXTTv/vENe8pD+Vk+lLXDmBKF4k1SzuaWaXzAVW8Y+VLYJH9gm/fPyDubkU4eZuzcQFNUMfCXXfORvgVo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=TZpL51ow; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="TZpL51ow" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67F53C4CEF0; Wed, 16 Jul 2025 12:00:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1752667208; bh=REfYG0y1V5JUVC4Q7wIXUcib7iF+kuVZMdibeSMEPlQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=TZpL51ow2z922MHN6YlmciaZ1cY/pJi1V90TcNm0wML/ILMuf+9wfqx1JKp8SEjZi tSGMJRC6Jw08sFWqLxjWBQwnX4Mdg2h1BzoeOjK6qYygXuWDbObALrdBO0P60CfKlx +VNtPRa/X1FYhap7Rm8H0kawG4pYSZCY+RmNJxBQ= Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 14:00:06 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Ignacio =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pe=F1a?= Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unnecessary comment separator lines Message-ID: <2025071645-portly-battalion-a295@gregkh> References: <20250716113740.73025-1-ignacio.pena87@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250716113740.73025-1-ignacio.pena87@gmail.com> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 07:37:38AM -0400, Ignacio Peņa wrote: > From: Ignacio Pena > > Remove the long dashed separator lines from block comments as they > don't follow kernel coding style, as suggested by Greg KH. > > Signed-off-by: Ignacio Pena > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c | 6 ------ > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c > index 7a74b011d..abc123def 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c > @@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ Efuse_Write1ByteToFakeContent(u16 Offset, u8 Value) > * When Who Remark > * 11/17/2008 MHC Create Version 0. > * > - *---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ > void > Efuse_PowerSwitch( > struct adapter *padapter, > @@ -163,7 +162,6 @@ EFUSE_GetEfuseDefinition( > * When Who Remark > * 09/23/2008 MHC Copy from WMAC. > * > - *---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ > u8 > EFUSE_Read1Byte( > struct adapter *Adapter, > @@ -313,7 +311,6 @@ Efuse_WordEnableDataWrite(struct adapter *padapter, > * When Who Remark > * 11/11/2008 MHC Create Version 0. > * > - *---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ > void > Efuse_ReadAllMap( > struct adapter *padapter, > @@ -350,7 +347,6 @@ void Efuse_ReadAllMap(struct adapter *padapter, u8 efuseType, u8 *Efuse, bool bP > * When Who Remark > * 11/12/2008 MHC Create Version 0. > * > - *---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ > static void efuse_ShadowRead1Byte(struct adapter *padapter, u16 Offset, u8 *Value) > { > struct eeprom_priv *pEEPROM = GET_EEPROM_EFUSE_PRIV(padapter); > @@ -396,7 +392,6 @@ static void efuse_ShadowRead4Byte(struct adapter *padapter, u16 Offset, u32 *Val > * When Who Remark > * 11/13/2008 MHC Create Version 0. > * > - *---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ > void EFUSE_ShadowMapUpdate(struct adapter *padapter, u8 efuseType, bool bPseudoTest) > { > struct eeprom_priv *pEEPROM = GET_EEPROM_EFUSE_PRIV(padapter); > @@ -429,7 +424,6 @@ void EFUSE_ShadowMapUpdate(struct adapter *padapter, u8 efuseType, bool bPseudoT > * When Who Remark > * 11/12/2008 MHC Create Version 0. > * > - *---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ > void EFUSE_ShadowRead(struct adapter *padapter, u8 Type, u16 Offset, u32 *Value) > { > if (Type == 1) > -- > 2.39.5 > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what needs to be done here to properly describe this. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot