All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Michael C. Pratt" <mcpratt@pm.me>,
	INAGAKI Hiroshi <musashino.open@gmail.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nvmem: layouts: u-boot-env: remove crc32 endianness conversion
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 11:42:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025071656-heap-student-9163@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b25f83e8-7e5d-44f8-9f16-909cb005aadd@kernel.org>

On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 04:44:00PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/13/25 4:42 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 05:41:45PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 07:17:26PM +0100, srini@kernel.org wrote:
> >>> From: "Michael C. Pratt" <mcpratt@pm.me>
> >>>
> >>> On 11 Oct 2022, it was reported that the crc32 verification
> >>> of the u-boot environment failed only on big-endian systems
> >>> for the u-boot-env nvmem layout driver with the following error.
> >>>
> >>>   Invalid calculated CRC32: 0x88cd6f09 (expected: 0x096fcd88)
> >>>
> >>> This problem has been present since the driver was introduced,
> >>> and before it was made into a layout driver.
> >>>
> >>> The suggested fix at the time was to use further endianness
> >>> conversion macros in order to have both the stored and calculated
> >>> crc32 values to compare always represented in the system's endianness.
> >>> This was not accepted due to sparse warnings
> >>> and some disagreement on how to handle the situation.
> >>> Later on in a newer revision of the patch, it was proposed to use
> >>> cpu_to_le32() for both values to compare instead of le32_to_cpu()
> >>> and store the values as __le32 type to remove compilation errors.
> >>>
> >>> The necessity of this is based on the assumption that the use of crc32()
> >>> requires endianness conversion because the algorithm uses little-endian,
> >>> however, this does not prove to be the case and the issue is unrelated.
> >>>
> >>> Upon inspecting the current kernel code,
> >>> there already is an existing use of le32_to_cpu() in this driver,
> >>> which suggests there already is special handling for big-endian systems,
> >>> however, it is big-endian systems that have the problem.
> >>>
> >>> This, being the only functional difference between architectures
> >>> in the driver combined with the fact that the suggested fix
> >>> was to use the exact same endianness conversion for the values
> >>> brings up the possibility that it was not necessary to begin with,
> >>> as the same endianness conversion for two values expected to be the same
> >>> is expected to be equivalent to no conversion at all.
> >>>
> >>> After inspecting the u-boot environment of devices of both endianness
> >>> and trying to remove the existing endianness conversion,
> >>> the problem is resolved in an equivalent way as the other suggested fixes.
> >>>
> >>> Ultimately, it seems that u-boot is agnostic to endianness
> >>> at least for the purpose of environment variables.
> >>> In other words, u-boot reads and writes the stored crc32 value
> >>> with the same endianness that the crc32 value is calculated with
> >>> in whichever endianness a certain architecture runs on.
> >>>
> >>> Therefore, the u-boot-env driver does not need to convert endianness.
> >>> Remove the usage of endianness macros in the u-boot-env driver,
> >>> and change the type of local variables to maintain the same return type.
> >>>
> >>> If there is a special situation in the case of endianness,
> >>> it would be a corner case and should be handled by a unique "compatible".
> >>>
> >>> Even though it is not necessary to use endianness conversion macros here,
> >>> it may be useful to use them in the future for consistent error printing.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: d5542923f200 ("nvmem: add driver handling U-Boot environment variables")
> >>
> >> Note, this is a 6.1 commit id, but:
> >>
> >>> Reported-by: INAGAKI Hiroshi <musashino.open@gmail.com>
> >>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221011024928.1807-1-musashino.open@gmail.com
> >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12.x
> >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6.x: f4cf4e5: Revert "nvmem: add new config option"
> >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6.x: 7f38b70: of: device: Export of_device_make_bus_id()
> >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6.x: 4a1a402: nvmem: Move of_nvmem_layout_get_container() in another header
> >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6.x: fc29fd8: nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
> >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6.x: 0331c61: nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
> >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6.x: 401df0d: nvmem: layouts: refactor .add_cells() callback arguments
> >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6.x: 6d0ca4a: nvmem: layouts: store owner from modules with nvmem_layout_driver_register()
> >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6.x: 5f15811: nvmem: layouts: add U-Boot env layout
> >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6.x
> >>
> >> That's a load of (short) git ids for just 6.6.y?  What about 6.1.y?
> > 
> > And really, ALL of those commits are needed for this very tiny patch?
> May be not, AFAIU  Fixes: d5542923f200 ("nvmem: add driver handling
> U-Boot environment variables") should be enough.

Great, can you fix this up and resend?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-16  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-12 18:17 [PATCH 0/2] nvmem: fixes for 6.16 srini
2025-07-12 18:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvmem: layouts: u-boot-env: remove crc32 endianness conversion srini
2025-07-13 15:41   ` Greg KH
2025-07-13 15:42     ` Greg KH
2025-07-15 15:44       ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2025-07-16  9:42         ` Greg KH [this message]
2025-07-16 21:24       ` Michael Pratt
2025-07-21 13:57         ` Greg KH
2025-07-12 18:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvmem: imx-ocotp: fix MAC address byte length srini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025071656-heap-student-9163@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcpratt@pm.me \
    --cc=musashino.open@gmail.com \
    --cc=srini@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.