From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
To: "Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>,
"Jyri Sarha" <jyri.sarha@iki.fi>,
"Tomi Valkeinen" <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: "Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/tidss: encoder: convert to devm_drm_bridge_alloc()
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 15:56:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250717155659.000eb000@booty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DBE5Z1SRJ086.NA0KUAWX1MS3@kernel.org>
Hello Jyri, Tomi, Michael,
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 09:49:44 +0200
"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for taking a look!
>
> > However allocating an encoder using a bridge alloc function (while we
> > used to call an encoder allocation function) looks counter-intuitive.
> >
> > We had discussed on IRC a different idea, adding a wrapper structure
> > around the bridge. Quoting your proposal:
> >
> > struct tidss_encoder_bridge {
> > struct drm_bridge bridge;
> > struct tidss_encoder *encoder
> > }
> >
> > and then in the bridge funcs go from drm_bridge to tidss_encoder_brigde
> > and use the pointer to get the original private struct.
>
> I was doing that until I've realized that meson/meson_encoder_* is
> doing it the way this patch does it.
Which was done by, er, myself. O:-)
To my excuse, meson was using *_encoder_alloc() but rather
devm_kzalloc() + drm_simple_encoder_init(), and the change was
semi-automated via a coccinelle script, so I didn't fully realize that.
> > That would be cleaner and more intuitive, but use a bit more memory and
> > have an additional pointer deref, thus I think we can live with the
> > patch you just sent, at least for now.
>
> I'm fine with changing it to the wrapper struct. It's your/the
> maintainers call :)
I think the driver maintainers opinion is more relevant, but in lack of
one I think we can take the patch as is, given it's already written.
Jyri, Tomi?
Luca
--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-17 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-16 13:41 [PATCH] drm/tidss: encoder: convert to devm_drm_bridge_alloc() Michael Walle
2025-07-17 7:41 ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-07-17 7:49 ` Michael Walle
2025-07-17 13:56 ` Luca Ceresoli [this message]
2025-07-18 11:13 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2025-07-18 14:44 ` Luca Ceresoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250717155659.000eb000@booty \
--to=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jyri.sarha@iki.fi \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.