Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Support exposing raw cycle counters in PTP and mlx5

[Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>]

On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:15:30 +0300 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> This patch series introduces support for exposing the raw free-running
> cycle counter of PTP hardware clocks. Some telemetry and low-level
> logging use cycle counter timestamps rather than nanoseconds.
> Currently, there is no generic interface to correlate these raw values
> with system time.
> 
> To address this, the series introduces two new ioctl commands that
> allow userspace to query the device's raw cycle counter together with
> host time:
> 
>  - PTP_SYS_OFFSET_PRECISE_CYCLES
> 
>  - PTP_SYS_OFFSET_EXTENDED_CYCLES
> 
> These commands work like their existing counterparts but return the
> device timestamp in cycle units instead of real-time nanoseconds.
> 
> This can also be useful in the XDP fast path: if a driver inserts the
> raw cycle value into metadata instead of a real-time timestamp, it can
> avoid the overhead of converting cycles to time in the kernel. Then
> userspace can resolve the cycle-to-time mapping using this ioctl when
> needed.
> 
> Adds the new PTP ioctls and integrates support in ptp_ioctl():
> - ptp: Add ioctl commands to expose raw cycle counter values
> 
> Support for exposing raw cycles in mlx5:
> - net/mlx5: Extract MTCTR register read logic into helper function
> - net/mlx5: Support getcyclesx and getcrosscycles

It'd be great to an Ack from Thomas or Richard on this (or failing that
at least other vendors?) Seems like we have a number of parallel
efforts to extend the PTP uAPI, I'm not sure how they all square
against each other, TBH.

Full thread for folks I CCed in:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/1752556533-39218-1-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com/