All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: "G Thomas, Rohan" <rohan.g.thomas@altera.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
	Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@bootlin.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@altera.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: stmmac: Set CIC bit only for TX queues with COE
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 21:06:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250718200602.GM2459@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38d05790-eb4a-482a-89ec-8c17cf2e9680@altera.com>

On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 11:50:06AM +0530, G Thomas, Rohan wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On 7/16/2025 1:52 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 07:14:21PM +0530, G Thomas, Rohan wrote:
> > > Hi Simon,
> > > 
> > > Thanks for reviewing the patch.
> > > 
> > > On 7/14/2025 7:10 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 03:59:19PM +0800, Rohan G Thomas via B4 Relay wrote:
> > > > > From: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@altera.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Currently, in the AF_XDP transmit paths, the CIC bit of
> > > > > TX Desc3 is set for all packets. Setting this bit for
> > > > > packets transmitting through queues that don't support
> > > > > checksum offloading causes the TX DMA to get stuck after
> > > > > transmitting some packets. This patch ensures the CIC bit
> > > > > of TX Desc3 is set only if the TX queue supports checksum
> > > > > offloading.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@altera.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@altera.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Rohan,
> > > > 
> > > > I notice that stmmac_xmit() handles a few other cases where
> > > > checksum offload should not be requested via stmmac_prepare_tx_desc:
> > > > 
> > > >           csum_insertion = (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL);
> > > >           /* DWMAC IPs can be synthesized to support tx coe only for a few tx
> > > >            * queues. In that case, checksum offloading for those queues that don't
> > > >            * support tx coe needs to fallback to software checksum calculation.
> > > >            *
> > > >            * Packets that won't trigger the COE e.g. most DSA-tagged packets will
> > > >            * also have to be checksummed in software.
> > > >            */
> > > >           if (csum_insertion &&
> > > >               (priv->plat->tx_queues_cfg[queue].coe_unsupported ||
> > > >                !stmmac_has_ip_ethertype(skb))) {
> > > >                   if (unlikely(skb_checksum_help(skb)))
> > > >                           goto dma_map_err;
> > > >                   csum_insertion = !csum_insertion;
> > > >           }
> > > > 
> > > > Do we need to care about them in stmmac_xdp_xmit_zc()
> > > > and stmmac_xdp_xmit_xdpf() too?
> > > 
> > > This patch only addresses avoiding the TX DMA hang by ensuring the CIC
> > > bit is only set when the queue supports checksum offload. For DSA tagged
> > > packets checksum offloading is not supported by the DWMAC IPs but no TX
> > > DMA hang. AFAIK, currently AF_XDP paths don't have equivalent handling
> > > like skb_checksum_help(), since they operate on xdp buffers. So this
> > > patch doesn't attempt to implement a sw fallback but just avoids DMA
> > > stall.
> > 
> > Ok, fair enough.
> > 
> > As per Andrew's advice elsewhere in this thread.
> > This patch also looks like it should be a fix for net,
> > and should have a Fixes tag.
> 
> Thanks for your comments.
> 
> You're right—this patch is a fix for the TX DMA hang issue caused by
> setting the CIC bit on queues that don't support checksum offload. But
> I couldn’t pinpoint a specific commit that introduced this behavior in
> the AF_XDP path. Initially, there was no support for DWMAC IPs with COE
> enabled only on specific queues, even though there can be IPs with such
> configuration. Commit 8452a05b2c63 ("net: stmmac: Tx coe sw fallback")
> added software fallback support for the AF_PACKET path. But the AF_XDP
> path has always enabled COE unconditionally even before that. So, do you
> think referencing the commit 8452a05b2c63 in the Fixes tag is
> appropriate and sufficient?

Hi Rohan,

Perhaps I'm missing the point, but my thinking is as follows:

As this patch only addresses the AF_XDP path I think we can take the
approach of asking "in which patch would a user of AF_XDP with this stmmac
observe this bug". (Or some variant thereof.) And I think the answer to
that question is the patch that added AF_XDP support to stmmac driver.

So I think we can use:

Fixes: 132c32ee5bc0 ("net: stmmac: Add TX via XDP zero-copy socket")


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-18 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-14  7:59 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: stmmac: xgmac: Minor fixes Rohan G Thomas
2025-07-14  7:59 ` Rohan G Thomas via B4 Relay
2025-07-14  7:59 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: stmmac: xgmac: Disable RX FIFO Overflow interrupts Rohan G Thomas
2025-07-14  7:59   ` Rohan G Thomas via B4 Relay
2025-07-14 13:34   ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-15 13:16     ` G Thomas, Rohan
2025-07-15 13:24       ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-14  7:59 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: stmmac: xgmac: Correct supported speed modes Rohan G Thomas
2025-07-14  7:59   ` Rohan G Thomas via B4 Relay
2025-07-14 13:42   ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-15 13:33     ` G Thomas, Rohan
2025-07-15 15:10       ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-17 11:47       ` Serge Semin
2025-07-17 12:59         ` G Thomas, Rohan
2025-07-17 17:22           ` Serge Semin
2025-07-18 11:38             ` G Thomas, Rohan
2025-07-24 16:18         ` G Thomas, Rohan
2025-07-24 17:56           ` Serge Semin
2025-07-25  9:18             ` G Thomas, Rohan
2025-07-17  6:45   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-07-17 12:26     ` G Thomas, Rohan
2025-07-14  7:59 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: stmmac: Set CIC bit only for TX queues with COE Rohan G Thomas
2025-07-14  7:59   ` Rohan G Thomas via B4 Relay
2025-07-14 13:40   ` Simon Horman
2025-07-15 13:44     ` G Thomas, Rohan
2025-07-16  8:22       ` Simon Horman
2025-07-17  6:20         ` G Thomas, Rohan
2025-07-18 20:06           ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-07-24 16:03             ` G Thomas, Rohan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250718200602.GM2459@horms.kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=matthew.gerlach@altera.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rohan.g.thomas@altera.com \
    --cc=romain.gantois@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.