From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dma-mapping: prepare dma_map_ops to conversion to physical address
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 16:10:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250720131008.GJ402218@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202507201935.hwB4Ebxp-lkp@intel.com>
On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 07:28:05PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Leon,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on next-20250718]
> [cannot apply to linus/master v6.16-rc6 v6.16-rc5 v6.16-rc4 v6.16-rc6]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Leon-Romanovsky/dma-mapping-prepare-dma_map_ops-to-conversion-to-physical-address/20250720-173726
> base: next-20250718
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/184fc9bda626efc62c5022ace01a20b80d1dc93b.1753003879.git.leon%40kernel.org
> patch subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] dma-mapping: prepare dma_map_ops to conversion to physical address
> config: s390-randconfig-001-20250720 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250720/202507201935.hwB4Ebxp-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 16534d19bf50bde879a83f0ae62875e2c5120e64)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250720/202507201935.hwB4Ebxp-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507201935.hwB4Ebxp-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> kernel/dma/mapping.c:192:12: warning: variable 'addr' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> 192 | else if (ops->map_page)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/dma/mapping.c:198:32: note: uninitialized use occurs here
> 198 | trace_dma_map_phys(dev, phys, addr, size, dir, attrs);
> | ^~~~
> kernel/dma/mapping.c:192:8: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
> 192 | else if (ops->map_page)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 193 | addr = ops->map_page(dev, page, offset, size, dir,
> kernel/dma/mapping.c:159:17: note: initialize the variable 'addr' to silence this warning
> 159 | dma_addr_t addr;
> | ^
> | = 0
> 1 warning generated.
Strange, I didn't get any warning about it for v1.
Thanks
>
>
> vim +192 kernel/dma/mapping.c
>
> 154
> 155 dma_addr_t dma_map_phys(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size,
> 156 enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
> 157 {
> 158 const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
> 159 dma_addr_t addr;
> 160
> 161 BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir));
> 162
> 163 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev->dma_mask))
> 164 return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
> 165
> 166 if (dma_map_direct(dev, ops) ||
> 167 arch_dma_map_phys_direct(dev, phys + size))
> 168 addr = dma_direct_map_phys(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
> 169 else if (use_dma_iommu(dev))
> 170 addr = iommu_dma_map_phys(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
> 171 else {
> 172 struct page *page = phys_to_page(phys);
> 173 size_t offset = offset_in_page(phys);
> 174 bool is_pfn_valid = true;
> 175
> 176 if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG)) {
> 177 is_pfn_valid = pfn_valid(PHYS_PFN(phys));
> 178
> 179 /* We shouldn't have both functions */
> 180 WARN_ON_ONCE(ops->map_page && ops->map_phys);
> 181 }
> 182
> 183 if (unlikely(!is_pfn_valid))
> 184 return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
> 185
> 186 /*
> 187 * All platforms which implement .map_page() don't support
> 188 * non-struct page backed addresses.
> 189 */
> 190 if (ops->map_phys)
> 191 addr = ops->map_phys(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
> > 192 else if (ops->map_page)
> 193 addr = ops->map_page(dev, page, offset, size, dir,
> 194 attrs);
> 195 }
> 196
> 197 kmsan_handle_dma(phys, size, dir);
> 198 trace_dma_map_phys(dev, phys, addr, size, dir, attrs);
> 199 debug_dma_map_phys(dev, phys, size, dir, addr, attrs);
> 200
> 201 return addr;
> 202 }
> 203 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_map_phys);
> 204
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-20 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-20 9:35 [PATCH v1 0/2] Preparation to .map_page and .unmap_page removal Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-20 9:35 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] dma-mapping: prepare dma_map_ops to conversion to physical address Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-20 11:28 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-20 13:10 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-07-20 9:35 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] dma-mapping: convert dummy ops to physical address mapping Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250720131008.GJ402218@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.