All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: leitao@debian.org,arighi@nvidia.com,peterz@infradead.org,tj@kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/ext: Prevent update_locked_rq() calls with NULL rq" failed to apply to 6.15-stable tree
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 12:54:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025072133-babble-buddhist-9fbe@gregkh> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 6.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e14fd98c6d66cb76694b12c05768e4f9e8c95664
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025072133-babble-buddhist-9fbe@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.15.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From e14fd98c6d66cb76694b12c05768e4f9e8c95664 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 10:38:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] sched/ext: Prevent update_locked_rq() calls with NULL rq

Avoid invoking update_locked_rq() when the runqueue (rq) pointer is NULL
in the SCX_CALL_OP and SCX_CALL_OP_RET macros.

Previously, calling update_locked_rq(NULL) with preemption enabled could
trigger the following warning:

    BUG: using __this_cpu_write() in preemptible [00000000]

This happens because __this_cpu_write() is unsafe to use in preemptible
context.

rq is NULL when an ops invoked from an unlocked context. In such cases, we
don't need to store any rq, since the value should already be NULL
(unlocked). Ensure that update_locked_rq() is only called when rq is
non-NULL, preventing calling __this_cpu_write() on preemptible context.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Fixes: 18853ba782bef ("sched_ext: Track currently locked rq")
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Acked-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.15

diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index b498d867ba21..7dd5cbcb7a06 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -1272,7 +1272,8 @@ static inline struct rq *scx_locked_rq(void)
 
 #define SCX_CALL_OP(sch, mask, op, rq, args...)					\
 do {										\
-	update_locked_rq(rq);							\
+	if (rq)									\
+		update_locked_rq(rq);						\
 	if (mask) {								\
 		scx_kf_allow(mask);						\
 		(sch)->ops.op(args);						\
@@ -1280,14 +1281,16 @@ do {										\
 	} else {								\
 		(sch)->ops.op(args);						\
 	}									\
-	update_locked_rq(NULL);							\
+	if (rq)									\
+		update_locked_rq(NULL);						\
 } while (0)
 
 #define SCX_CALL_OP_RET(sch, mask, op, rq, args...)				\
 ({										\
 	__typeof__((sch)->ops.op(args)) __ret;					\
 										\
-	update_locked_rq(rq);							\
+	if (rq)									\
+		update_locked_rq(rq);						\
 	if (mask) {								\
 		scx_kf_allow(mask);						\
 		__ret = (sch)->ops.op(args);					\
@@ -1295,7 +1298,8 @@ do {										\
 	} else {								\
 		__ret = (sch)->ops.op(args);					\
 	}									\
-	update_locked_rq(NULL);							\
+	if (rq)									\
+		update_locked_rq(NULL);						\
 	__ret;									\
 })
 


             reply	other threads:[~2025-07-21 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-21 10:54 gregkh [this message]
2025-07-22 12:34 ` [PATCH 6.15.y] sched/ext: Prevent update_locked_rq() calls with NULL rq Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025072133-babble-buddhist-9fbe@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.