From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Yuri Andriaccio <yurand2000@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
Yuri Andriaccio <yuri.andriaccio@santannapisa.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Remove fair-servers from real-time task's bandwidth accounting
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:07:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202507220727.BmA1Osdg-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250721111131.309388-1-yurand2000@gmail.com>
Hi Yuri,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/sched/core]
[also build test ERROR on tip/master peterz-queue/sched/core next-20250721]
[cannot apply to tip/auto-latest linus/master v6.16-rc7]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yuri-Andriaccio/sched-deadline-Remove-fair-servers-from-real-time-task-s-bandwidth-accounting/20250721-191333
base: tip/sched/core
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250721111131.309388-1-yurand2000%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Remove fair-servers from real-time task's bandwidth accounting
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-001-20250722 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250722/202507220727.BmA1Osdg-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14+deb12u1) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250722/202507220727.BmA1Osdg-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507220727.BmA1Osdg-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
ld: kernel/sched/build_policy.o: in function `dl_server_apply_params':
>> kernel/sched/deadline.c:1693: undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
vim +1693 kernel/sched/deadline.c
1677
1678 int dl_server_apply_params(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, u64 runtime, u64 period, bool init)
1679 {
1680 u64 max_bw, new_bw = to_ratio(period, runtime);
1681 struct rq *rq = dl_se->rq;
1682 int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
1683 struct dl_bw *dl_b;
1684 unsigned long cap;
1685 int retval = 0;
1686 int cpus;
1687
1688 dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
1689 guard(raw_spinlock)(&dl_b->lock);
1690
1691 cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
1692 cap = dl_bw_capacity(cpu);
> 1693 max_bw = cap_scale(BW_UNIT - dl_b->bw, cap) / cpus;
1694
1695 if (new_bw > max_bw)
1696 return -EBUSY;
1697
1698 if (init) {
1699 __add_rq_bw(new_bw, &rq->dl);
1700 } else {
1701 dl_rq_change_utilization(rq, dl_se, new_bw);
1702 }
1703
1704 dl_se->dl_runtime = runtime;
1705 dl_se->dl_deadline = period;
1706 dl_se->dl_period = period;
1707
1708 dl_se->runtime = 0;
1709 dl_se->deadline = 0;
1710
1711 dl_se->dl_bw = to_ratio(dl_se->dl_period, dl_se->dl_runtime);
1712 dl_se->dl_density = to_ratio(dl_se->dl_deadline, dl_se->dl_runtime);
1713
1714 return retval;
1715 }
1716
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-22 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-21 11:11 [PATCH] sched/deadline: Remove fair-servers from real-time task's bandwidth accounting Yuri Andriaccio
2025-07-22 0:07 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-07-25 11:44 ` Matteo Martelli
2025-07-25 15:28 ` Yuri Andriaccio
2025-07-25 17:22 ` Matteo Martelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202507220727.BmA1Osdg-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yurand2000@gmail.com \
--cc=yuri.andriaccio@santannapisa.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.