All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Yuri Andriaccio <yurand2000@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
	Yuri Andriaccio <yuri.andriaccio@santannapisa.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Remove fair-servers from real-time task's bandwidth accounting
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:07:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202507220727.BmA1Osdg-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250721111131.309388-1-yurand2000@gmail.com>

Hi Yuri,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on tip/sched/core]
[also build test ERROR on tip/master peterz-queue/sched/core next-20250721]
[cannot apply to tip/auto-latest linus/master v6.16-rc7]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yuri-Andriaccio/sched-deadline-Remove-fair-servers-from-real-time-task-s-bandwidth-accounting/20250721-191333
base:   tip/sched/core
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250721111131.309388-1-yurand2000%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Remove fair-servers from real-time task's bandwidth accounting
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-001-20250722 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250722/202507220727.BmA1Osdg-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14+deb12u1) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250722/202507220727.BmA1Osdg-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507220727.BmA1Osdg-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   ld: kernel/sched/build_policy.o: in function `dl_server_apply_params':
>> kernel/sched/deadline.c:1693: undefined reference to `__udivdi3'


vim +1693 kernel/sched/deadline.c

  1677	
  1678	int dl_server_apply_params(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, u64 runtime, u64 period, bool init)
  1679	{
  1680		u64 max_bw, new_bw = to_ratio(period, runtime);
  1681		struct rq *rq = dl_se->rq;
  1682		int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
  1683		struct dl_bw *dl_b;
  1684		unsigned long cap;
  1685		int retval = 0;
  1686		int cpus;
  1687	
  1688		dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
  1689		guard(raw_spinlock)(&dl_b->lock);
  1690	
  1691		cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
  1692		cap = dl_bw_capacity(cpu);
> 1693		max_bw = cap_scale(BW_UNIT - dl_b->bw, cap) / cpus;
  1694	
  1695		if (new_bw > max_bw)
  1696			return -EBUSY;
  1697	
  1698		if (init) {
  1699			__add_rq_bw(new_bw, &rq->dl);
  1700		} else {
  1701			dl_rq_change_utilization(rq, dl_se, new_bw);
  1702		}
  1703	
  1704		dl_se->dl_runtime = runtime;
  1705		dl_se->dl_deadline = period;
  1706		dl_se->dl_period = period;
  1707	
  1708		dl_se->runtime = 0;
  1709		dl_se->deadline = 0;
  1710	
  1711		dl_se->dl_bw = to_ratio(dl_se->dl_period, dl_se->dl_runtime);
  1712		dl_se->dl_density = to_ratio(dl_se->dl_deadline, dl_se->dl_runtime);
  1713	
  1714		return retval;
  1715	}
  1716	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-22  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-21 11:11 [PATCH] sched/deadline: Remove fair-servers from real-time task's bandwidth accounting Yuri Andriaccio
2025-07-22  0:07 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-07-25 11:44 ` Matteo Martelli
2025-07-25 15:28   ` Yuri Andriaccio
2025-07-25 17:22     ` Matteo Martelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202507220727.BmA1Osdg-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yurand2000@gmail.com \
    --cc=yuri.andriaccio@santannapisa.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.