All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] netconsole: add support for strings with new line in netpoll_parse_ip_addr
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:42:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250725134224.0a2da8e7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250723-netconsole_ref-v3-3-8be9b24e4a99@debian.org>

On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 10:20:31 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
>  	const char *end;
> +	int len;
>  
> -	if (!strchr(str, ':') &&
> -	    in4_pton(str, -1, (void *)addr, -1, &end) > 0) {
> -		if (!*end)
> -			return 0;
> -	}
> -	if (in6_pton(str, -1, addr->in6.s6_addr, -1, &end) > 0) {
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> -		if (!*end)
> -			return 1;
> -#else
> +	len = strlen(str);
> +	if (!len)
>  		return -1;
> -#endif
> -	}
> +
> +	if (str[len - 1] == '\n')
> +		len -= 1;
> +
> +	if (in4_pton(str, len, (void *)addr, -1, &end) > 0)
> +		return 0;
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) &&
> +	    in6_pton(str, len, addr->in6.s6_addr, -1, &end) > 0)
> +		return 1;
>  	return -1;

Looks like we're removing the validation for reaching the end of 
the buffer? This should at least be explained in the commit message.
AFAICT for IPv4 for example 1.2.3.4:xyz would have been rejected,
now it's accepted. Personally I find the

	if (*end && *end != '\n')

removed by subsequent patch cleaner than modifying the input string.

I'll apply the first patch of the series..

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-25 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-23 17:20 [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] netconsole: reuse netpoll_parse_ip_addr in configfs helpers Breno Leitao
2025-07-23 17:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/5] netpoll: Remove unused fields from inet_addr union Breno Leitao
2025-07-23 17:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] netconsole: move netpoll_parse_ip_addr() earlier for reuse Breno Leitao
2025-07-23 17:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] netconsole: add support for strings with new line in netpoll_parse_ip_addr Breno Leitao
2025-07-25 20:42   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-07-23 17:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] netconsole: use netpoll_parse_ip_addr in local_ip_store Breno Leitao
2025-07-23 17:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] " Breno Leitao
2025-07-25 22:17 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] netconsole: reuse netpoll_parse_ip_addr in configfs helpers patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250725134224.0a2da8e7@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.