From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE9FBC83F26 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:48:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=OWIvTVOsNDhRbAvxvQqVkPa08dkzFWDu6M13pQjxpUM=; b=HLDstqkptsyVVfr/c2HNCpE0C5 Us5PftyEocXSQqHX3mdEl36phLt9aGfDJqooumq5pKqU2melwLyxVwFlvpqz63snsAuIAJvWzQw20 NU1FshQ3dcu6NsKYz4mE4seYG542vX/4bv9nVD2US7vPUkdVCIq04SolYYQfLO/DDR9MTesaYL3tq //UWEStpyPu7+2YS9v8ZiLvYQW1eX3VzSFQFeaxMvahE7PDxzL02COheVTHeBXDqSqWsq2WB1iGbT MgPpc1Fu4txAkgmNrk8/4YnwRY8Q4Rozs61CneWlJf9hHQrZv+6L9whkgSdqEFgoa+Kk0h172CetR FOOgkfCA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uh86g-00000001mD1-2ttg; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:48:38 +0000 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.20]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uh81u-00000001lZz-0nod for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:43:43 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1753886623; x=1785422623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=idRnj5P4PrYGxexiNDf1IWPLr0mVthPDzs6oUfOLhrM=; b=k7+HGMIj2fJh4I80sSzLhN7vtJ63Vs4xfPZzGVtY+8CAKTYSiDzCI8i8 4GNk7y73M0/AgaddFKqe6M3jZ+Dgd1LB8yY7ihsmDzcXTd30hjDhQOFvT RugsZKJM4gMXDQIdnB+yqgd/QdpHAiWkPgtqyfrSWxl4YHsXR4jUSbs5D cp568AvD3DOknEi8j7sk0u8r7cr1OxiYZdG6UG7040s4MayiyRGhDdzIz N7MB/uKtZfJs8q/Of7TXx3WteK7cqQY7PTEI6lvjo8Iijt0/efUV3pjHz I/ubcRFRhnLo4CmTVxupImtXpps/F1YDktJLwT7gSTP7Cl0Wi2vP9zTjA A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +zgNAzo3S4OwidMt9fvdRQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: wfVj/Et4QKyQ4VH7N297lw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11507"; a="55890922" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,350,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="55890922" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Jul 2025 07:43:40 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: oTzVPsG9QR+19wHO6VXhaA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8uYbk/j7SeWAaepWravi+g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,350,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="193987297" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 160750d4a34c) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2025 07:43:34 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 160750d4a34c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uh81k-0002qG-0g; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:43:32 +0000 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:43:04 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment?= Le Goffic , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Philipp Zabel , Jonathan Corbet , Gatien Chevallier , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Gabriel Fernandez , Le Goffic , Julius Werner Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment?= Le Goffic Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/20] perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM driver Message-ID: <202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250728-ddrperfm-upstream-v5-13-03f1be8ad396@foss.st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250728-ddrperfm-upstream-v5-13-03f1be8ad396@foss.st.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250730_074342_292315_1C1C205C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.46 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Clément, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on 89be9a83ccf1f88522317ce02f854f30d6115c41] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Cl-ment-Le-Goffic/bus-firewall-move-stm32_firewall-header-file-in-include-folder/20250728-234144 base: 89be9a83ccf1f88522317ce02f854f30d6115c41 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250728-ddrperfm-upstream-v5-13-03f1be8ad396%40foss.st.com patch subject: [PATCH v5 13/20] perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM driver config: s390-randconfig-001-20250730 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250730/202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250730/202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:213:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 213 | writel_relaxed(r->start.mask, pmu->membase + r->start.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:220:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 220 | writel_relaxed(r->stop.mask, pmu->membase + r->stop.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:227:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 227 | writel_relaxed(r->clear_time.mask, pmu->membase + r->clear_time.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:234:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 234 | writel_relaxed(r->clear_cnt.mask & BIT(counter->idx), pmu->membase + r->clear_cnt.reg); | ^ >> drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:240:15: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 240 | u32 status = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->status.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:255:12: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 255 | u32 val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->enable.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:258:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 258 | writel_relaxed(val, pmu->membase + r->enable.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:264:12: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 264 | u32 val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->enable.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:267:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 267 | writel_relaxed(val, pmu->membase + r->enable.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:285:17: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 285 | cnt_sel_val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->cfg.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:288:3: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 288 | writel_relaxed(cnt_sel_val, pmu->membase + r->cfg.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:302:16: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 302 | cnt_sel_val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + cnt_sel_evt_reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:306:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 306 | writel_relaxed(cnt_sel_val, pmu->membase + cnt_sel_evt_reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:428:9: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 428 | val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->counter_evt[counter->idx].reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:778:3: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 778 | writel_relaxed(pmu->dram_type, pmu->membase + pmu->cfg->regs->dram_inf.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:803:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 803 | writel_relaxed(pmu->dram_type, pmu->membase + pmu->cfg->regs->dram_inf.reg); | ^ 16 errors generated. vim +/writel_relaxed +213 drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c 208 209 static void stm32_ddr_start_counters(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu) 210 { 211 const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs; 212 > 213 writel_relaxed(r->start.mask, pmu->membase + r->start.reg); 214 } 215 216 static void stm32_ddr_stop_counters(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu) 217 { 218 const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs; 219 220 writel_relaxed(r->stop.mask, pmu->membase + r->stop.reg); 221 } 222 223 static void stm32_ddr_clear_time_counter(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu) 224 { 225 const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs; 226 227 writel_relaxed(r->clear_time.mask, pmu->membase + r->clear_time.reg); 228 } 229 230 static void stm32_ddr_clear_event_counter(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu, struct stm32_ddr_cnt *counter) 231 { 232 const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs; 233 234 writel_relaxed(r->clear_cnt.mask & BIT(counter->idx), pmu->membase + r->clear_cnt.reg); 235 } 236 237 static void stm32_ddr_clear_counter(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu, struct stm32_ddr_cnt *counter) 238 { 239 const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs; > 240 u32 status = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->status.reg); 241 242 if (counter->idx == pmu->cfg->time_cnt_idx) 243 stm32_ddr_clear_time_counter(pmu); 244 else 245 stm32_ddr_clear_event_counter(pmu, counter); 246 247 if (status & r->status.mask) 248 dev_err(pmu->dev, "Failed to clear counter %i because the PMU is busy\n", 249 counter->idx); 250 } 251 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki