All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] Bluetooth: bfusb: Fix use-after-free and memory leak in device lifecycle
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 06:32:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025073101-upon-lilac-9d22@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aIrSp18mz3GS67a1@pc>

On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 03:19:19AM +0100, Salah Triki wrote:
> The driver stores a reference to the `usb_device` structure (`udev`)
> in its private data (`data->udev`), which can persist beyond the
> immediate context of the `bfusb_probe()` function.
> 
> Without proper reference count management, this can lead to two issues:
> 
> 1. A `use-after-free` scenario if `udev` is accessed after its main
>    reference count drops to zero (e.g., if the device is disconnected
>    and the `data` structure is still active).

How can that happen as during the probe/remove cycle, the reference
count is always properly incremetned.

> 2. A `memory leak` if `udev`'s reference count is not properly
>    decremented during driver disconnect, preventing the `usb_device`
>    object from being freed.

There is no leak here at all, sorry.

> To correctly manage the `udev` lifetime, explicitly increment its
> reference count with `usb_get_dev(udev)` when storing it in the
> driver's private data. Correspondingly, decrement the reference count
> with `usb_put_dev(data->udev)` in the `bfusb_disconnect()` callback.
> 
> This ensures `udev` remains valid while referenced by the driver's
> private data and is properly released when no longer needed.

How was this tested?

I'm not saying the change is wrong, just that I don't think it's
actually a leak, or fix of anything real.

Or do you have a workload that shows this is needed?  If so, what is the
crash reported?

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-31  4:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-31  2:19 [PATCH V3] Bluetooth: bfusb: Fix use-after-free and memory leak in device lifecycle Salah Triki
2025-07-31  3:38 ` [V3] " bluez.test.bot
2025-07-31  4:32 ` Greg KH [this message]
2025-07-31 11:20   ` [PATCH V3] " Salah Triki
2025-07-31 11:52     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025073101-upon-lilac-9d22@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=salah.triki@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.