From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 685E614883F for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 17:20:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753896056; cv=none; b=iprnc89gz92FujDJumeCLyugVMUe0fY6mjWWaounSE7DZDCv0ZgFz5S43E0VuQXLEiCserhE0nFreeSLjHnLwAGPyvcDDvHz0CBayOvpkBREKpJf3JqiU3s4R3iQQz7DJN5qHwpeqYDJX8k3cdvB9HLa8NDnb0pp7KpYH/lNfDo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753896056; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XwLyQFA0eJ+BNj2LQDHbuUXgooS36pVf1xNx3EsW2/g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=RngWuIq2ezK1ry5bAUlfCTge2JxhjT7Vf9CnG4M96Mk/O58OcIlbTiPHmUNnX/ihxLZKaJ2aj/ehtrEKtxYo4eq1lIJW3aNj098qaEqjwxev8wCkd6NIVVvJs2jGpq82Bce7n6W5VM9+l9984ZKP4ABELugXpTZ+TgHdDGhlHs8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=gBfq2jJQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="gBfq2jJQ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1753896054; x=1785432054; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=XwLyQFA0eJ+BNj2LQDHbuUXgooS36pVf1xNx3EsW2/g=; b=gBfq2jJQHJCz+Dk5/TFeDaNCLTSk6mnpbCdllDn5QdZ9d8gfrCN1PlUT 6KhLsLrqlMRzFkbu3kVHzDl3p0sFDSZSR5QncFfzyjQuZr7f/4Td9OtM/ jY70QpX5uixqzCLe+5AYpfYRlHCpaxFUO9n3xB5mBfaagVNGyxkzUJZjE KWHdh68hYsL3o/FI+WOFwsETPS2VoF131rGnEGmv+zvTG+1BXeOAMe8eo pNACILl98dvDxOsrllBQiqz+GfT3P+7Zj72y7KY3oXeL2oi4BcKUWz5gv +9Dgbowz7MsjcgKn2gafWKnBm6ul/f8WxRqYB8ElFdpqGlBufAHDN5jxP A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: t0qyqtvnQ6yB47um9jBOgg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MoIk53YLQSaqGhvMMf0YuA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11507"; a="55905676" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,350,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="55905676" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Jul 2025 10:20:53 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ffTnmkZiQJSCaRHMGT9z1A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ODzgl+KnQ06JvoHC0H3H7g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,350,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="162632290" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 160750d4a34c) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2025 10:20:52 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 160750d4a34c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uhATx-0002zQ-2l; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 17:20:49 +0000 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 01:19:50 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: kernel@openeuler.org, Yang Yingliang Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1740/1740] mm/mem_reliable.c:126:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'reliable_limit_handler' was not declared. Should it be static? Message-ID: <202507310153.fW2hs6vO-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: 859de5033e15abefcf19935429e6478be97d889a commit: 1845e7add95773a24019fb72bbea24a0a568663b [1740/1740] mm: Add reliable memory use limit for user tasks config: arm64-randconfig-r121-20250729 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250731/202507310153.fW2hs6vO-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250731/202507310153.fW2hs6vO-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507310153.fW2hs6vO-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> mm/mem_reliable.c:126:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'reliable_limit_handler' was not declared. Should it be static? mm/mem_reliable.c:126:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'reliable_limit_handler' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 126 | int reliable_limit_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/reliable_limit_handler +126 mm/mem_reliable.c 124 125 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL > 126 int reliable_limit_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, 127 void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos) 128 { 129 unsigned long old = task_reliable_limit; 130 int ret; 131 132 ret = proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos); 133 if (ret == 0 && write) { 134 if (task_reliable_limit > total_reliable_mem_sz()) { 135 task_reliable_limit = old; 136 return -EINVAL; 137 } 138 } 139 140 return ret; 141 } 142 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki