All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] docs: kdoc: split top-level prototype parsing out of dump_struct()
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 07:34:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250801073411.06cb530e@foz.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250801001326.924276-6-corbet@lwn.net>

Em Thu, 31 Jul 2025 18:13:19 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> escreveu:

> Move the initial split of the prototype into its own function in the
> ongoing effort to cut dump_struct() down to size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> ---
>  scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py | 44 +++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py b/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py
> index 5e375318df9c..2bb0da22048f 100644
> --- a/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py
> +++ b/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py
> @@ -624,13 +624,11 @@ class KernelDoc:
>              self.emit_msg(ln,
>                            f"No description found for return value of '{declaration_name}'")
>  
> -    def dump_struct(self, ln, proto):
> -        """
> -        Store an entry for an struct or union
> -        """
> -
> +    #
> +    # Split apart a structure prototype; returns (struct|union, name, members) or None
> +    #
> +    def split_struct_proto(self, proto):
>          type_pattern = r'(struct|union)'
> -
>          qualifiers = [
>              "__attribute__",
>              "__packed",
> @@ -638,36 +636,34 @@ class KernelDoc:
>              "____cacheline_aligned_in_smp",
>              "____cacheline_aligned",
>          ]
> -
>          definition_body = r'\{(.*)\}\s*' + "(?:" + '|'.join(qualifiers) + ")?"
>  
> -        # Extract struct/union definition
> -        members = None
> -        declaration_name = None
> -        decl_type = None
> -
>          r = KernRe(type_pattern + r'\s+(\w+)\s*' + definition_body)
>          if r.search(proto):
> -            decl_type = r.group(1)
> -            declaration_name = r.group(2)
> -            members = r.group(3)
> +            return (r.group(1), r.group(2), r.group(3))
>          else:
>              r = KernRe(r'typedef\s+' + type_pattern + r'\s*' + definition_body + r'\s*(\w+)\s*;')
> -
>              if r.search(proto):
> -                decl_type = r.group(1)
> -                declaration_name = r.group(3)
> -                members = r.group(2)
> +                return (r.group(1), r.group(3), r.group(2))
> +        return None
>  
> -        if not members:
> +    def dump_struct(self, ln, proto):
> +        """
> +        Store an entry for an struct or union
> +        """
> +        #
> +        # Do the basic parse to get the pieces of the declaration.
> +        #
> +        struct_parts = self.split_struct_proto(proto)
> +        if not struct_parts:
>              self.emit_msg(ln, f"{proto} error: Cannot parse struct or union!")
>              return
> +        decl_type, declaration_name, members = struct_parts
>  
>          if self.entry.identifier != declaration_name:
> -            self.emit_msg(ln,
> -                          f"expecting prototype for {decl_type} {self.entry.identifier}. Prototype was for {decl_type} {declaration_name} instead\n")
> +            self.emit_msg(ln, f"expecting prototype for {decl_type} {self.entry.identifier}. "
> +                          f"Prototype was for {decl_type} {declaration_name} instead\n")
>              return
> -
>          #
>          # Go through the list of members applying all of our transformations.
>          #
> @@ -696,7 +692,7 @@ class KernelDoc:
>          # So, we need to have an extra loop on Python to override such
>          # re limitation.
>  
> -        struct_members = KernRe(type_pattern + r'([^{};]+)(\{)([^{}]*)(\})([^{};]*)(;)')
> +        struct_members = KernRe(r'(struct|union)([^{};]+)(\{)([^{}]*)(\})([^{};]*)(;)')

I would prefer keeping type_pattern here. 

With that:

Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>


>          while True:
>              tuples = struct_members.findall(members)
>              if not tuples:



Thanks,
Mauro

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-01  5:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-01  0:13 [PATCH 00/12] docs: kdoc: thrash up dump_struct() Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-01  0:13 ` [PATCH 01/12] docs: kdoc: consolidate the stripping of private struct/union members Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-01  5:29   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-01  0:13 ` [PATCH 02/12] docs: kdoc: Move a regex line in dump_struct() Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-01  5:29   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-01  0:13 ` [PATCH 03/12] docs: kdoc: backslashectomy in kdoc_parser Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-01  4:27   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-01 14:21     ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-04 12:58       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-04 16:00         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-04 18:29           ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-01  0:13 ` [PATCH 04/12] docs: kdoc: move the prefix transforms out of dump_struct() Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-01  5:28   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-01  5:35     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-01  0:13 ` [PATCH 05/12] docs: kdoc: split top-level prototype parsing " Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-01  5:34   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2025-08-01 14:10     ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-04 12:20       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-01  0:13 ` [PATCH 06/12] docs: kdoc: split struct-member rewriting " Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-01  5:37   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-01  0:13 ` [PATCH 07/12] docs: kdoc: rework the rewrite_struct_members() main loop Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-01  5:42   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-01  0:13 ` [PATCH 08/12] docs: kdoc: remove an extraneous strip() call Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-01  5:45   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-01  0:13 ` [PATCH 09/12] docs: kdoc: Some rewrite_struct_members() commenting Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-01  5:50   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-01  0:13 ` [PATCH 10/12] docs: kdoc: further rewrite_struct_members() cleanup Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-01  6:07   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-01 22:52     ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-04 13:15       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-05 22:46         ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-06  9:05           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-06 13:00             ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-06 21:27               ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-01  0:13 ` [PATCH 11/12] docs: kdoc: extract output formatting from dump_struct() Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-01  6:09   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-01  0:13 ` [PATCH 12/12] docs: kdoc: a few final dump_struct() touches Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-01  6:10   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-01  6:23 ` [PATCH 00/12] docs: kdoc: thrash up dump_struct() Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250801073411.06cb530e@foz.lan \
    --to=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
    --cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.