Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] iio: adc: ad7476: Simplify chip type detection

[Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>]

On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 13:07:13 +0300
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> wrote:

> The ad7476 driver uses a table of structures for defining the IC variant
> specific data. Table is indexed using enum values, which are picked by
> SPI ID.
> 
> Having the table and an enum adds extra complexity. It is potentially
> unsafe if someone alters the enumeration values, or size of the IC data
> table.
> 
> Simplify this by dropping the table and using individual structures for
> the IC specific data, and storing the IC specific structure's address
> directly in the SPI ID data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
> 
> ---
> 100% Untested.
> No functional changes intended

One tiny thing inline, otherwise looks good to me.  This aligns with
how we prefer to do things these days.  Tends to end up easier to read
than the enum array thing and best of all removes any temptation to use
the enum for anything else.

>  
>  static const struct iio_info ad7476_info = {
> @@ -312,7 +306,7 @@ static int ad7476_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  
>  	st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  	st->chip_info =
> -		&ad7476_chip_info_tbl[spi_get_device_id(spi)->driver_data];
> +		(struct ad7476_chip_info *)spi_get_device_id(spi)->driver_data;

Switch to spi_get_device_match_data()
which checks via generic firmware paths first (so DT here) and then the
old school tables.  Also returns a void * so gets rid of need to cast.

Only works with all pointers (or a lot of care) because a value 0 is a
fail to match.  So kind of enabled by your patch.

Jonathan


>  
>  	reg = devm_regulator_get(&spi->dev, "vcc");
>  	if (IS_ERR(reg))
> @@ -408,41 +402,41 @@ static int ad7476_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  }