All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kernel.org>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@oracle.com>,
	"Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@gnu.org>,
	Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 11/16] s390/unwind_user/sframe: Enable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_SFRAME
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 14:53:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250801125350.9905B20-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250710163522.3195293-12-jremus@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 06:35:17PM +0200, Jens Remus wrote:
> Add s390 support for unwinding of user space using SFrame.  This
> leverages the previous commits to address the following s390
> particularities:
> 
> - The CFA is defined as the value of the stack pointer (SP) at call
>   site in the previous frame + 160.  Therefore the SP unwinds as
>   SP = CFA - 160.  Therefore use a SP value offset from CFA of -160.
> 
> - The return address (RA) is not saved on the stack at function entry.
>   It is also not saved in the function prologue, when in leaf functions.
>   Therefore the RA does not necessarily need to be unwound in the first
>   unwinding step for the topmost frame.
> 
> - The frame pointer (FP) and/or return address (RA) may be saved in
>   other registers when in leaf functions.  GCC effectively uses
>   floating-point registers (FPR) for this purpose.  Therefore DWARF
>   register numbers may be encoded in the SFrame FP/RA offsets.

...

> +static inline void __s390_get_dwarf_fpr(unsigned long *val, int regnum)
> +{
> +	switch (regnum) {
> +	case 16:
> +		fpu_std(0, (freg_t *)val);
> +		break;

...

> +static inline int s390_unwind_user_get_reg(unsigned long *val, int regnum)
> +{
> +	if (0 <= regnum && regnum <= 15) {
> +		struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
> +		*val = regs->gprs[regnum];
> +	} else if (16 <= regnum && regnum <= 31) {
> +		__s390_get_dwarf_fpr(val, regnum);

This won't work with other potential in-kernel fpu users. User space fpr
contents may have been written to the current task's fpu save area and fprs
may have been clobbered by in-kernel users; so you need to get register
contents from the correct location. See arch/s390/include/asm/fpu.h.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-01 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-10 16:35 [RFC PATCH v1 00/16] s390: SFrame user space unwinding Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/16] fixup! unwind_user: Add frame pointer support Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/16] s390: asm/dwarf.h should only be included in assembly files Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/16] s390/vdso: Avoid emitting DWARF CFI for non-vDSO Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/16] s390/vdso: Enable SFrame generation in vDSO Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/16] s390/vdso: Keep function symbols " Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/16] unwind_user: Enable archs that define CFA = SP_callsite + offset Jens Remus
2025-07-16 21:32   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17  9:27     ` Jens Remus
2025-07-18  4:51       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/16] unwind_user: Enable archs that do not necessarily save RA Jens Remus
2025-07-16 23:01   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17 11:09     ` Jens Remus
2025-07-18  8:28       ` Jens Remus
2025-07-18 16:59         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-21 14:25           ` Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/16] unwind_user: Enable archs that save RA/FP in other registers Jens Remus
2025-07-17  2:01   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17  2:50     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17 12:07       ` Jens Remus
2025-07-18  4:52         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17  3:57     ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-17  7:24       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17 12:05         ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-17 11:28     ` Jens Remus
2025-07-17 12:10       ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-18  4:51       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/16] unwind_user/sframe: Enable archs with encoded SFrame CFA offsets Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/16] s390/ptrace: Enable HAVE_USER_RA_REG Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/16] s390/unwind_user/sframe: Enable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_SFRAME Jens Remus
2025-08-01 12:53   ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2025-08-01 15:46     ` Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/16] unwind_user/backchain: Introduce back chain user space unwinding Jens Remus
2025-07-17  2:06   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17 12:20     ` Jens Remus
2025-07-18  5:19       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-08-01 12:36         ` Heiko Carstens
2025-08-01 15:49           ` Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/16] s390/unwind_user/backchain: Enable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_BACKCHAIN Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/16] PREREQ: x86/asm: Avoid emitting DWARF CFI for non-VDSO Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/16] PREREQ: x86/vdso: Enable sframe generation in VDSO Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/16] WIP: fixup! s390/unwind_user/sframe: Enable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_SFRAME Jens Remus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250801125350.9905B20-hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=indu.bhagat@oracle.com \
    --cc=jemarch@gnu.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=jremus@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@gentoo.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.