Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 1/1] package/gcc: add microblaze atomic support

From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>
To: "Frager, Neal" <neal.frager@amd.com>
Cc: "buildroot@buildroot.org" <buildroot@buildroot.org>,
	"giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com"
	<giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>,
	"ju.o@free.fr" <ju.o@free.fr>,
	"romain.naour@gmail.com" <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 1/1] package/gcc: add microblaze atomic support
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 12:58:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250805125846.31c941c1@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SA1PR12MB5615E2ACED00D66546CC13E7F022A@SA1PR12MB5615.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

Hello,

On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 10:31:40 +0000
"Frager, Neal" <neal.frager@amd.com> wrote:

> I would guess that running init under strace would be the more useful option.
> 
> I have already tested that gcc 15.1 works just fine with microblaze, as I am
> using gcc 15.1 with the gcc-bare-metal package to build the zynqmp pmufw, as
> well as the versal plm and psmfw applications. My expectation is that gcc 15
> is mostly working for microblaze, and that just picking a random user space
> application to build will probably work as expected.
> 
> There seems to be something specific in the init script that is failing.
> Should we consider creating another gcc bug report against gcc 15.x?

We can certainly do so, but we don't have a lot of data to provide at
the moment :/

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot