From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
dxu@dxuuu.xyz, deso@posteo.net, leon.hwang@linux.dev,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add case to test BPF_F_CPU
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 00:30:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250805163017.17015-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250805163017.17015-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
This patch adds test coverage for the new BPF_F_CPU flag support in
percpu_array maps. The following APIs are exercised:
* bpf_map_update_batch()
* bpf_map_lookup_batch()
* bpf_map_update_elem()
* bpf_map__update_elem()
* bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags()
* bpf_map__lookup_elem()
cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
./test_progs -t percpu_alloc
253/13 percpu_alloc/cpu_flag_tests:OK
253 percpu_alloc:OK
Summary: 1/13 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_array_flag.c | 24 +++
2 files changed, 173 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_array_flag.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c
index 343da65864d6d..2500675d489df 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include "percpu_alloc_array.skel.h"
#include "percpu_alloc_cgrp_local_storage.skel.h"
#include "percpu_alloc_fail.skel.h"
+#include "percpu_array_flag.skel.h"
static void test_array(void)
{
@@ -115,6 +116,152 @@ static void test_failure(void) {
RUN_TESTS(percpu_alloc_fail);
}
+static void test_cpu_flag(void)
+{
+ int map_fd, *keys = NULL, value_size, cpu, i, j, nr_cpus, err;
+ size_t key_sz = sizeof(int), value_sz = sizeof(u64);
+ u64 batch = 0, *values = NULL, flags;
+ struct percpu_array_flag *skel;
+ const u64 value = 0xDEADC0DE;
+ u32 count, max_entries;
+ struct bpf_map *map;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_batch_opts, batch_opts);
+
+ nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
+ if (!ASSERT_GT(nr_cpus, 0, "libbpf_num_possible_cpus"))
+ return;
+
+ skel = percpu_array_flag__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "percpu_array_flag__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ map = skel->maps.percpu;
+ map_fd = bpf_map__fd(map);
+ max_entries = bpf_map__max_entries(map);
+
+ value_size = value_sz * nr_cpus;
+ values = calloc(max_entries, value_size);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(values, "calloc values"))
+ goto out;
+ keys = calloc(max_entries, key_sz);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(keys, "calloc keys"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++)
+ keys[i] = i;
+ memset(values, 0, max_entries * value_size);
+
+ batch_opts.elem_flags = (u64)nr_cpus << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+ err = bpf_map_update_batch(map_fd, keys, values, &max_entries, &batch_opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map_update_batch -ERANGE"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++) {
+ memset(values, 0, max_entries * value_size);
+
+ /* clear values across all CPUs */
+ batch_opts.elem_flags = (u64)BPF_ALL_CPUS << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+ err = bpf_map_update_batch(map_fd, keys, values, &max_entries, &batch_opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_batch all cpus"))
+ goto out;
+
+ /* update values on specified CPU */
+ for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++)
+ values[i] = value;
+
+ batch_opts.elem_flags = (u64)cpu << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+ err = bpf_map_update_batch(map_fd, keys, values, &max_entries, &batch_opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_batch specified cpu"))
+ goto out;
+
+ /* lookup values on specified CPU */
+ memset(values, 0, max_entries * value_sz);
+ err = bpf_map_lookup_batch(map_fd, NULL, &batch, keys, values, &count, &batch_opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_TRUE(!err || err == -ENOENT, "bpf_map_lookup_batch specified cpu"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++)
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(values[i], value, "value on specified cpu"))
+ goto out;
+
+ /* lookup values from all CPUs */
+ batch_opts.elem_flags = 0;
+ memset(values, 0, max_entries * value_size);
+ err = bpf_map_lookup_batch(map_fd, NULL, &batch, keys, values, &count, &batch_opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_TRUE(!err || err == -ENOENT, "bpf_map_lookup_batch all cpus"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
+ for (j = 0; j < nr_cpus; j++) {
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(values[i*nr_cpus + j], j != cpu ? 0 : value,
+ "value on specified cpu"))
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ flags = (u64)nr_cpus << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+ err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, keys, values, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map_update_elem -ERANGE"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = bpf_map__update_elem(map, keys, key_sz, values, value_sz, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map__update_elem -ERANGE"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, keys, values, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags -ERANGE"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = bpf_map__lookup_elem(map, keys, key_sz, values, value_sz, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map__lookup_elem -ERANGE"))
+ goto out;
+
+ /* clear value on all cpus */
+ batch_opts.elem_flags = (u64)BPF_ALL_CPUS << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+ memset(values, 0, max_entries * value_sz);
+ err = bpf_map_update_batch(map_fd, keys, values, &max_entries, &batch_opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_batch all cpus"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++) {
+ /* update value on specified cpu */
+ values[0] = value;
+ flags = (u64)cpu << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+ for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
+ err = bpf_map__update_elem(map, keys + i, key_sz, values, value_sz, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__update_elem specified cpu"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (j = 0; j < nr_cpus; j++) {
+ /* lookup then check value on CPUs */
+ flags = (u64)j << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+ err = bpf_map__lookup_elem(map, keys + i, key_sz, values, value_sz,
+ flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__lookup_elem specified cpu"))
+ goto out;
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(values[0], j != cpu ? 0 : value,
+ "bpf_map__lookup_elem value on specified cpu"))
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* clear value on specified cpu */
+ values[0] = 0;
+ flags = (u64)cpu << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+ err = bpf_map__update_elem(map, keys, key_sz, values, value_sz, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__update_elem specified cpu"))
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+out:
+ if (keys)
+ free(keys);
+ if (values)
+ free(values);
+ percpu_array_flag__destroy(skel);
+}
+
void test_percpu_alloc(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("array"))
@@ -125,4 +272,6 @@ void test_percpu_alloc(void)
test_cgrp_local_storage();
if (test__start_subtest("failure_tests"))
test_failure();
+ if (test__start_subtest("cpu_flag_tests"))
+ test_cpu_flag();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_array_flag.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_array_flag.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..4d92e121958ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_array_flag.c
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 2);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, u64);
+} percpu SEC(".maps");
+
+SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1")
+int BPF_PROG(test_percpu_array, int x)
+{
+ u64 value = 0xDEADC0DE;
+ int key = 0;
+
+ bpf_map_update_elem(&percpu, &key, &value, BPF_ANY);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
--
2.50.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-05 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-05 16:30 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag for percpu_array maps Leon Hwang
2025-08-05 16:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] " Leon Hwang
2025-08-07 8:34 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-08-07 16:26 ` Leon Hwang
2025-08-07 17:20 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-08-08 16:11 ` Leon Hwang
2025-08-08 16:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-08-11 16:34 ` Leon Hwang
2025-08-05 16:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] libbpf: Support BPF_F_CPU " Leon Hwang
2025-08-05 16:30 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250805163017.17015-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=deso@posteo.net \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.