From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD1172E370A for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 05:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754545432; cv=none; b=DekQL5VwDCtCzTlo0CSqPRuYMQFivhfFhRHWMJ9MYLocn4QGlPvafkTSPB7IduOlxh5nFgWpWYnf9d9i5m3SVUAAfkEgfB6iJp8GVT+i6RfOiUzmgpfQQ6cCQtFf4Hs6sVQd8nfqDmFe5t+uxeYyVuwT9AEPXf+MXanH+ef3hkc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754545432; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Y8PwWxG6NhZ4hx+lZSLdvTGtrL3od2PF9xFFQ+W+ihI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=WsFQrRE4IC1NM1UlsvHy+SlOxxtsjVd+u/P57+vrSEIqf/adaYEi6dg2XJ94o01gVadTTjrmAzMvZkPeXhtlMoO72/PJIQiQn+JZRIFolAvtZFR5ul6LsvN6VQbpc5Oe5FTO3qamMn7BBfh2PVwgyTXa/xksUTm0yWqpxqiu4mI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hb3nLQ3r; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hb3nLQ3r" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45990C4CEEB; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 05:43:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1754545432; bh=Y8PwWxG6NhZ4hx+lZSLdvTGtrL3od2PF9xFFQ+W+ihI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hb3nLQ3rI+rQrDxsVy0fNAVqVVRPuh3IOBNbQwQffaCLHEyOmxW8ajOFndvk0C6k3 corApiL0Kw+Pe3p6j9f/AmG1AxjvmfuPzCOARahUqs5WCBN2LdleqYnugw5upmy6eB 2IARW757ZEPxsssBqjj5cTaFlnBdp0upaftcymIlBIeDS/ctjUQTJzPslcg6Mtcm6P bA+NzrFlVseYBOkAdSbnBe9XhUyKq3S8ZqOhJFvXP8VLR3H7IdkxECGfD22lWVoMlW fkp+jn4vf5sQxDI1dE7yH6DR2u18JLOe8anofFgEmSEwWeTf9MuvULRaV0BkOp1E9y losb5z6b1LiTA== From: SeongJae Park To: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: SeongJae Park , kernel test robot , Suren Baghdasaryan , oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List , Vlastimil Babka Subject: Re: [sj:mm-new 42/45] ERROR: modpost: __ex_table+0x1584 references non-executable section '.rodata.spk_ttyio_synth_probe.str1.4' Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 22:43:49 -0700 Message-Id: <20250807054349.21561-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <81fedf44-83dd-4f2b-9a2b-2f3d7ba4f922@lucifer.local> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 7 Aug 2025 06:31:25 +0100 Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > +cc SJ, as his tree :) Thank you, Lorenzo! > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 12:03:03PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sj/linux.git mm-new > > Not sure why SJ isn't cc'd when it's his tree? > > Not sure how easy it would be for the scripts to figure this out. As people might already realized, it is Andrew's mm-new branch. I started pushing Andrew's mm-{new,unstable,stable} branches to my tree for backup purpose, since DAMON development branch (damon/next) is using mm-new as its baseline. Seems it caused confusion to kernel test robot and other people. Sorry about that. kernel test robot, is there a way to mark mm-{new,unstable,stable} branches on my tree be ignored from your tests? If there is no good way, I can remove the branches from my tree. Thanks, SJ [...]