From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <gary.chang@realtek.com>, <damon.chen@realtek.com>
Subject: [PATCH rtw-next 4/8] wifi: rtw89: 8851b: rfk: update IQK TIA setting
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 20:37:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250811123744.15361-5-pkshih@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250811123744.15361-1-pkshih@realtek.com>
From: Kuan-Chung Chen <damon.chen@realtek.com>
With the new TIA setting of RX IQK, unstable RX throughput can
be avoided, especially in medium-high attenuation environments.
Signed-off-by: Kuan-Chung Chen <damon.chen@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
.../net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8851b_rfk.c | 85 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8851b_rfk.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8851b_rfk.c
index 7a319a6c838a..a7867b0e083a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8851b_rfk.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8851b_rfk.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
#define DPK_RF_REG_NUM_8851B 4
#define DPK_KSET_NUM 4
#define RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_NR 4
-#define RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_IDX_NR 2
+#define RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_IDX_NR 4
#define RTW8851B_TXK_GROUP_NR 1
#define RTW8851B_IQK_VER 0x14
#define RTW8851B_IQK_SS 1
@@ -114,9 +114,9 @@ static const u32 _tssi_de_mcs_10m[RF_PATH_NUM_8851B] = {0x5830};
static const u32 g_idxrxgain[RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_NR] = {0x10e, 0x116, 0x28e, 0x296};
static const u32 g_idxattc2[RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_NR] = {0x0, 0xf, 0x0, 0xf};
static const u32 g_idxrxagc[RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_NR] = {0x0, 0x1, 0x2, 0x3};
-static const u32 a_idxrxgain[RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_IDX_NR] = {0x10C, 0x28c};
-static const u32 a_idxattc2[RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_IDX_NR] = {0xf, 0xf};
-static const u32 a_idxrxagc[RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_IDX_NR] = {0x4, 0x6};
+static const u32 a_idxrxgain[RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_IDX_NR] = {0x10C, 0x112, 0x28c, 0x292};
+static const u32 a_idxattc2[RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_IDX_NR] = {0xf, 0xf, 0xf, 0xf};
+static const u32 a_idxrxagc[RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_IDX_NR] = {0x4, 0x5, 0x6, 0x7};
static const u32 a_power_range[RTW8851B_TXK_GROUP_NR] = {0x0};
static const u32 a_track_range[RTW8851B_TXK_GROUP_NR] = {0x6};
static const u32 a_gain_bb[RTW8851B_TXK_GROUP_NR] = {0x0a};
@@ -139,17 +139,6 @@ static const u32 dpk_rf_reg[DPK_RF_REG_NUM_8851B] = {0xde, 0x8f, 0x5, 0x10005};
static void _set_ch(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u32 val);
-static u8 _rxk_5ghz_group_from_idx(u8 idx)
-{
- /* There are four RXK groups (RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_NR), but only group 0
- * and 2 are used in 5 GHz band, so reduce elements to 2.
- */
- if (idx < RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_IDX_NR)
- return idx * 2;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static u8 _kpath(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_phy_idx phy_idx)
{
return RF_A;
@@ -196,7 +185,7 @@ static void _txck_force(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_rf_path path,
static void _rxck_force(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_rf_path path,
bool force, enum adc_ck ck)
{
- static const u32 ck960_8851b[] = {0x8, 0x2, 0x2, 0x4, 0xf, 0xa, 0x93};
+ static const u32 ck960_8851b[] = {0x8, 0x2, 0x2, 0x4, 0xf, 0xa, 0x92};
static const u32 ck1920_8851b[] = {0x9, 0x0, 0x0, 0x3, 0xf, 0xa, 0x49};
const u32 *data;
@@ -905,18 +894,27 @@ static bool _rxk_5g_group_sel(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
bool kfail = false;
bool notready;
u32 rf_0;
- u8 idx;
+ u32 val;
u8 gp;
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[IQK]===>%s\n", __func__);
- for (idx = 0; idx < RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_IDX_NR; idx++) {
- gp = _rxk_5ghz_group_from_idx(idx);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWE, RFREG_MASK, 0x1000);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWA, RFREG_MASK, 0x4);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWD0, RFREG_MASK, 0x17);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWA, RFREG_MASK, 0x5);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWD0, RFREG_MASK, 0x27);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWE, RFREG_MASK, 0x0);
+ val = rtw89_read_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_RXA2, 0x20);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_MOD, RR_MOD_MASK, 0xc);
+
+ for (gp = 0; gp < RTW8851B_RXK_GROUP_IDX_NR; gp++) {
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[IQK]S%x, gp = %x\n", path, gp);
- rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_MOD, RR_MOD_RGM, a_idxrxgain[idx]);
- rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_RXA2, RR_RXA2_ATT, a_idxattc2[idx]);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_MOD, RR_MOD_RGM, a_idxrxgain[gp]);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_RXA2, RR_RXA2_ATT, a_idxattc2[gp]);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_RXA2, 0x20, 0x1);
rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_CFIR_LUT, B_CFIR_LUT_SEL, 0x1);
rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_CFIR_LUT, B_CFIR_LUT_G3, 0x0);
@@ -926,7 +924,7 @@ static bool _rxk_5g_group_sel(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
fsleep(100);
rf_0 = rtw89_read_rf(rtwdev, path, RR_MOD, RFREG_MASK);
rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_IQK_DIF2, B_IQK_DIF2_RXPI, rf_0);
- rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_IQK_RXA, B_IQK_RXAGC, a_idxrxagc[idx]);
+ rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_IQK_RXA, B_IQK_RXAGC, a_idxrxagc[gp]);
rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_IQK_DIF4, B_IQK_DIF4_RXT, 0x11);
notready = _iqk_one_shot(rtwdev, phy_idx, path, ID_RXAGC);
@@ -959,6 +957,7 @@ static bool _rxk_5g_group_sel(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
_iqk_sram(rtwdev, path);
if (kfail) {
+ rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_IQK_RES, B_IQK_RES_RXCFIR, 0x0);
rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_RXIQC + (path << 8), MASKDWORD,
iqk_info->nb_rxcfir[path] | 0x2);
iqk_info->is_wb_txiqk[path] = false;
@@ -968,6 +967,14 @@ static bool _rxk_5g_group_sel(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
iqk_info->is_wb_txiqk[path] = true;
}
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_RXA2, 0x20, val);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWE, RFREG_MASK, 0x1000);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWA, RFREG_MASK, 0x4);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWD0, RFREG_MASK, 0x37);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWA, RFREG_MASK, 0x5);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWD0, RFREG_MASK, 0x27);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWE, RFREG_MASK, 0x0);
+
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK,
"[IQK]S%x, kfail = 0x%x, 0x8%x3c = 0x%x\n", path, kfail,
1 << path, iqk_info->nb_rxcfir[path]);
@@ -980,17 +987,26 @@ static bool _iqk_5g_nbrxk(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_phy_idx phy_idx,
struct rtw89_iqk_info *iqk_info = &rtwdev->iqk;
bool kfail = false;
bool notready;
- u8 idx = 0x1;
+ u8 gp = 2;
u32 rf_0;
- u8 gp;
-
- gp = _rxk_5ghz_group_from_idx(idx);
+ u32 val;
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[IQK]===>%s\n", __func__);
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[IQK]S%x, gp = %x\n", path, gp);
- rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_MOD, RR_MOD_RGM, a_idxrxgain[idx]);
- rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_RXA2, RR_RXA2_ATT, a_idxattc2[idx]);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWE, RFREG_MASK, 0x1000);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWA, RFREG_MASK, 0x4);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWD0, RFREG_MASK, 0x17);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWA, RFREG_MASK, 0x5);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWD0, RFREG_MASK, 0x27);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWE, RFREG_MASK, 0x0);
+
+ val = rtw89_read_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_RXA2, 0x20);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_MOD, RR_MOD_MASK, 0xc);
+
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_MOD, RR_MOD_RGM, a_idxrxgain[gp]);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_RXA2, RR_RXA2_ATT, a_idxattc2[gp]);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_RXA2, 0x20, 0x1);
rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_CFIR_LUT, B_CFIR_LUT_SEL, 0x1);
rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_CFIR_LUT, B_CFIR_LUT_G3, 0x0);
@@ -1000,7 +1016,7 @@ static bool _iqk_5g_nbrxk(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_phy_idx phy_idx,
fsleep(100);
rf_0 = rtw89_read_rf(rtwdev, path, RR_MOD, RFREG_MASK);
rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_IQK_DIF2, B_IQK_DIF2_RXPI, rf_0);
- rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_IQK_RXA, B_IQK_RXAGC, a_idxrxagc[idx]);
+ rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_IQK_RXA, B_IQK_RXAGC, a_idxrxagc[gp]);
rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_IQK_DIF4, B_IQK_DIF4_RXT, 0x11);
notready = _iqk_one_shot(rtwdev, phy_idx, path, ID_RXAGC);
@@ -1026,6 +1042,7 @@ static bool _iqk_5g_nbrxk(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_phy_idx phy_idx,
kfail = !!rtw89_phy_read32_mask(rtwdev, R_NCTL_RPT, B_NCTL_RPT_FLG);
if (kfail) {
+ rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_IQK_RES + (path << 8), 0xf, 0x0);
rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_RXIQC + (path << 8),
MASKDWORD, 0x40000002);
iqk_info->is_wb_rxiqk[path] = false;
@@ -1033,6 +1050,14 @@ static bool _iqk_5g_nbrxk(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_phy_idx phy_idx,
iqk_info->is_wb_rxiqk[path] = false;
}
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_RXA2, 0x20, val);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWE, RFREG_MASK, 0x1000);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWA, RFREG_MASK, 0x4);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWD0, RFREG_MASK, 0x37);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWA, RFREG_MASK, 0x5);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWD0, RFREG_MASK, 0x27);
+ rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, RR_LUTWE, RFREG_MASK, 0x0);
+
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK,
"[IQK]S%x, kfail = 0x%x, 0x8%x3c = 0x%x\n", path, kfail,
1 << path, iqk_info->nb_rxcfir[path]);
@@ -1664,8 +1689,6 @@ static void _iqk_init(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
struct rtw89_iqk_info *iqk_info = &rtwdev->iqk;
u8 idx, path;
- rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_IQKINF, MASKDWORD, 0x0);
-
if (iqk_info->is_iqk_init)
return;
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-11 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-11 12:37 [PATCH rtw-next 0/8] wifi: rtw89: improve connection loss and 8851B performance Ping-Ke Shih
2025-08-11 12:37 ` [PATCH rtw-next 1/8] wifi: rtw89: introduce beacon tracking to improve connection stability Ping-Ke Shih
2025-08-19 1:18 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2025-08-11 12:37 ` [PATCH rtw-next 2/8] wifi: rtw89: debug: add beacon_info debugfs Ping-Ke Shih
2025-08-11 12:37 ` [PATCH rtw-next 3/8] wifi: rtw89: wow: remove notify during WoWLAN net-detect Ping-Ke Shih
2025-08-11 12:37 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2025-08-11 12:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 5/8] wifi: rtw89: 8851b: rfk: update TX wideband IQK Ping-Ke Shih
2025-08-11 12:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 6/8] wifi: rtw89: 8852c: check LPS H2C command complete by C2H reg instead of done ack Ping-Ke Shih
2025-08-11 12:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 7/8] wifi: rtw89: fix BSSID comparison for non-transmitted BSSID Ping-Ke Shih
2025-08-11 12:40 ` [PATCH rtw-next 8/8] wifi: rtw89: fix group frames loss when connected to " Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250811123744.15361-5-pkshih@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=damon.chen@realtek.com \
--cc=gary.chang@realtek.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.