All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/deadline: only set free_cpus for online runqueues
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 12:05:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250811190536.661884-1-opendmb@gmail.com> (raw)

Commit 16b269436b72 ("sched/deadline: Modify cpudl::free_cpus
to reflect rd->online") introduced the cpudl_set/clear_freecpu
functions to allow the cpu_dl::free_cpus mask to be manipulated
by the deadline scheduler class rq_on/offline callbacks so the
mask would also reflect this state.

Commit 9659e1eeee28 ("sched/deadline: Remove cpu_active_mask
from cpudl_find()") removed the check of the cpu_active_mask to
save some processing on the premise that the cpudl::free_cpus
mask already reflected the runqueue online state.

Unfortunately, there are cases where it is possible for the
cpudl_clear function to set the free_cpus bit for a CPU when the
deadline runqueue is offline. When this occurs while a CPU is
connected to the default root domain the flag may retain the bad
state after the CPU has been unplugged. Later, a different CPU
that is transitioning through the default root domain may push a
deadline task to the powered down CPU when cpudl_find sees its
free_cpus bit is set. If this happens the task will not have the
opportunity to run.

One example is outlined here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250110233010.2339521-1-opendmb@gmail.com

Another occurs when the last deadline task is migrated from a
CPU that has an offlined runqueue. The dequeue_task member of
the deadline scheduler class will eventually call cpudl_clear
and set the free_cpus bit for the CPU.

This commit modifies the cpudl_clear function to be aware of the
online state of the deadline runqueue so that the free_cpus mask
can be updated appropriately.

It is no longer necessary to manage the mask outside of the
cpudl_set/clear functions so the cpudl_set/clear_freecpu
functions are removed. In addition, since the free_cpus mask is
now only updated under the cpudl lock the code was changed to
use the non-atomic __cpumask functions.

Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c | 34 +++++++++-------------------------
 kernel/sched/cpudeadline.h |  4 +---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c    |  8 ++++----
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
index cdd740b3f774..d612d5c6c61a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
@@ -166,12 +166,13 @@ int cpudl_find(struct cpudl *cp, struct task_struct *p,
  * cpudl_clear - remove a CPU from the cpudl max-heap
  * @cp: the cpudl max-heap context
  * @cpu: the target CPU
+ * @online: the online state of the deadline runqueue
  *
  * Notes: assumes cpu_rq(cpu)->lock is locked
  *
  * Returns: (void)
  */
-void cpudl_clear(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu)
+void cpudl_clear(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu, bool online)
 {
 	int old_idx, new_cpu;
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -184,7 +185,7 @@ void cpudl_clear(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu)
 	if (old_idx == IDX_INVALID) {
 		/*
 		 * Nothing to remove if old_idx was invalid.
-		 * This could happen if a rq_offline_dl is
+		 * This could happen if rq_online_dl or rq_offline_dl is
 		 * called for a CPU without -dl tasks running.
 		 */
 	} else {
@@ -195,9 +196,12 @@ void cpudl_clear(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu)
 		cp->elements[new_cpu].idx = old_idx;
 		cp->elements[cpu].idx = IDX_INVALID;
 		cpudl_heapify(cp, old_idx);
-
-		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cp->free_cpus);
 	}
+	if (unlikely(!online))
+		__cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cp->free_cpus);
+	else
+		__cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cp->free_cpus);
+
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cp->lock, flags);
 }
 
@@ -228,7 +232,7 @@ void cpudl_set(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu, u64 dl)
 		cp->elements[new_idx].cpu = cpu;
 		cp->elements[cpu].idx = new_idx;
 		cpudl_heapify_up(cp, new_idx);
-		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cp->free_cpus);
+		__cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cp->free_cpus);
 	} else {
 		cp->elements[old_idx].dl = dl;
 		cpudl_heapify(cp, old_idx);
@@ -237,26 +241,6 @@ void cpudl_set(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu, u64 dl)
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cp->lock, flags);
 }
 
-/*
- * cpudl_set_freecpu - Set the cpudl.free_cpus
- * @cp: the cpudl max-heap context
- * @cpu: rd attached CPU
- */
-void cpudl_set_freecpu(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu)
-{
-	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cp->free_cpus);
-}
-
-/*
- * cpudl_clear_freecpu - Clear the cpudl.free_cpus
- * @cp: the cpudl max-heap context
- * @cpu: rd attached CPU
- */
-void cpudl_clear_freecpu(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu)
-{
-	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cp->free_cpus);
-}
-
 /*
  * cpudl_init - initialize the cpudl structure
  * @cp: the cpudl max-heap context
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.h b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.h
index 11c0f1faa7e1..d7699468eedd 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.h
@@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ struct cpudl {
 
 int  cpudl_find(struct cpudl *cp, struct task_struct *p, struct cpumask *later_mask);
 void cpudl_set(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu, u64 dl);
-void cpudl_clear(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu);
+void cpudl_clear(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu, bool online);
 int  cpudl_init(struct cpudl *cp);
-void cpudl_set_freecpu(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu);
-void cpudl_clear_freecpu(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu);
 void cpudl_cleanup(struct cpudl *cp);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index e2d51f4306b3..ef91871b14d8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1832,7 +1832,7 @@ static void dec_dl_deadline(struct dl_rq *dl_rq, u64 deadline)
 	if (!dl_rq->dl_nr_running) {
 		dl_rq->earliest_dl.curr = 0;
 		dl_rq->earliest_dl.next = 0;
-		cpudl_clear(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->cpu);
+		cpudl_clear(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->cpu, rq->online);
 		cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, rq->rt.highest_prio.curr);
 	} else {
 		struct rb_node *leftmost = rb_first_cached(&dl_rq->root);
@@ -2878,9 +2878,10 @@ static void rq_online_dl(struct rq *rq)
 	if (rq->dl.overloaded)
 		dl_set_overload(rq);
 
-	cpudl_set_freecpu(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->cpu);
 	if (rq->dl.dl_nr_running > 0)
 		cpudl_set(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->cpu, rq->dl.earliest_dl.curr);
+	else
+		cpudl_clear(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->cpu, true);
 }
 
 /* Assumes rq->lock is held */
@@ -2889,8 +2890,7 @@ static void rq_offline_dl(struct rq *rq)
 	if (rq->dl.overloaded)
 		dl_clear_overload(rq);
 
-	cpudl_clear(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->cpu);
-	cpudl_clear_freecpu(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->cpu);
+	cpudl_clear(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->cpu, false);
 }
 
 void __init init_sched_dl_class(void)
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2025-08-11 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-11 19:05 Doug Berger [this message]
2025-08-12 15:14 ` [PATCH] sched/deadline: only set free_cpus for online runqueues Juri Lelli
2025-08-15  1:16   ` Doug Berger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250811190536.661884-1-opendmb@gmail.com \
    --to=opendmb@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.