From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
john.g.garry@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/11] generic: Add atomic write test using fio crc check verifier
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 10:16:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250812171617.GA7938@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <783e950d8b5ad80672a359a19ede4faeb64e3dd7.1754833177.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 07:11:55PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> This adds atomic write test using fio based on it's crc check verifier.
> fio adds a crc for each data block. If the underlying device supports
> atomic write then it is guaranteed that we will never have a mix data from
> two threads writing on the same physical block.
>
> Avoid doing overlapping parallel atomic writes because it might give
> unexpected results. Use offset_increment=, size= fio options to achieve
> this behavior.
>
> Co-developed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
John had the most opinions about the last iteration of this test, but it
looks reasonable enough to me...
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> tests/generic/1226 | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/generic/1226.out | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/generic/1226
> create mode 100644 tests/generic/1226.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/1226 b/tests/generic/1226
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..efc360e1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/1226
> @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2025 IBM Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 1226
> +#
> +# Validate FS atomic write using fio crc check verifier.
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +. ./common/atomicwrites
> +
> +_begin_fstest auto aio rw atomicwrites
> +
> +_require_scratch_write_atomic
> +_require_odirect
> +_require_aio
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +_require_xfs_io_command "falloc"
> +
> +touch "$SCRATCH_MNT/f1"
> +awu_min_write=$(_get_atomic_write_unit_min "$SCRATCH_MNT/f1")
> +awu_max_write=$(_get_atomic_write_unit_max "$SCRATCH_MNT/f1")
> +
> +blocksize=$(_max "$awu_min_write" "$((awu_max_write/2))")
> +threads=$(_min "$(($(nproc) * 2 * LOAD_FACTOR))" "100")
> +filesize=$((blocksize * threads * 100))
> +depth=$threads
> +io_size=$((filesize / threads))
> +io_inc=$io_size
> +testfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/test-file
> +
> +fio_config=$tmp.fio
> +fio_out=$tmp.fio.out
> +
> +fio_aw_config=$tmp.aw.fio
> +fio_verify_config=$tmp.verify.fio
> +
> +function create_fio_configs()
> +{
> + create_fio_aw_config
> + create_fio_verify_config
> +}
> +
> +function create_fio_verify_config()
> +{
> +cat >$fio_verify_config <<EOF
> + [verify-job]
> + direct=1
> + ioengine=libaio
> + rw=read
> + bs=$blocksize
> + filename=$testfile
> + size=$filesize
> + iodepth=$depth
> + group_reporting=1
> +
> + verify_only=1
> + verify=crc32c
> + verify_fatal=1
> + verify_state_save=0
> + verify_write_sequence=0
> +EOF
> +}
> +
> +function create_fio_aw_config()
> +{
> +cat >$fio_aw_config <<EOF
> + [atomicwrite-job]
> + direct=1
> + ioengine=libaio
> + rw=randwrite
> + bs=$blocksize
> + filename=$testfile
> + size=$io_inc
> + offset_increment=$io_inc
> + iodepth=$depth
> + numjobs=$threads
> + group_reporting=1
> + atomic=1
> +
> + verify_state_save=0
> + verify=crc32c
> + do_verify=0
> +EOF
> +}
> +
> +create_fio_configs
> +_require_fio $fio_aw_config
> +
> +cat $fio_aw_config >> $seqres.full
> +cat $fio_verify_config >> $seqres.full
> +
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -fc "falloc 0 $filesize" $testfile >> $seqres.full
> +
> +$FIO_PROG $fio_aw_config >> $seqres.full
> +ret1=$?
> +$FIO_PROG $fio_verify_config >> $seqres.full
> +ret2=$?
> +
> +[[ $ret1 -eq 0 && $ret2 -eq 0 ]] || _fail "fio with atomic write failed"
> +
> +# success, all done
> +echo Silence is golden
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/generic/1226.out b/tests/generic/1226.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..6dce0ea5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/1226.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 1226
> +Silence is golden
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-12 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-10 13:41 [PATCH v4 00/11] Add more tests for multi fs block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] common/rc: Add _min() and _max() helpers Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-13 12:20 ` David Laight
2025-08-21 10:35 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] common/rc: Add a helper to run fsx on a given file Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] ltp/fsx.c: Add atomic writes support to fsx Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-13 13:42 ` John Garry
2025-08-21 9:45 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] generic: Add atomic write test using fio crc check verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-12 17:16 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-08-13 13:39 ` John Garry
2025-08-21 8:42 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-21 9:24 ` John Garry
2025-08-21 12:18 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] generic: Add atomic write test using fio verify on file mixed mappings Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-12 17:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] generic: Add atomic write multi-fsblock O_[D]SYNC tests Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-11 15:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] generic: Stress fsx with atomic writes enabled Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-12 17:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-13 5:45 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] generic: Add sudden shutdown tests for multi block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] ext4: Atomic writes stress test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-12 8:08 ` John Garry
2025-08-13 7:08 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-13 7:33 ` John Garry
2025-08-21 8:29 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] ext4: Atomic writes test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier on multiple files Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-13 13:45 ` John Garry
2025-08-21 8:28 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-21 9:28 ` John Garry
2025-08-21 12:19 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] ext4: Atomic write test for extent split across leaf nodes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-12 17:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-13 5:45 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-13 13:54 ` John Garry
2025-08-21 8:25 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-21 9:23 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250812171617.GA7938@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.