From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuniyu@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Neal Cardwell" <ncardwell@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@google.com>,
"Matthieu Baerts" <matttbe@kernel.org>,
"Mat Martineau" <martineau@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
"Shakeel Butt" <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
mptcp@lists.linux.dev, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 12/12] net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from global protocol memory accounting.
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 23:08:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202508122213.H31XXZsm-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250811173116.2829786-13-kuniyu@google.com>
Hi Kuniyuki,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on net-next/main]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kuniyuki-Iwashima/mptcp-Fix-up-subflow-s-memcg-when-CONFIG_SOCK_CGROUP_DATA-n/20250812-013522
base: net-next/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250811173116.2829786-13-kuniyu%40google.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 12/12] net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from global protocol memory accounting.
config: csky-randconfig-002-20250812 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250812/202508122213.H31XXZsm-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: csky-linux-gcc (GCC) 10.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250812/202508122213.H31XXZsm-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202508122213.H31XXZsm-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/cleanup.h:5,
from include/linux/irqflags.h:17,
from include/asm-generic/cmpxchg.h:15,
from arch/csky/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:162,
from include/asm-generic/atomic.h:12,
from arch/csky/include/asm/atomic.h:199,
from include/linux/atomic.h:7,
from include/crypto/aead.h:11,
from net/tls/tls_device.c:32:
net/tls/tls_device.c: In function 'tls_do_allocation':
>> net/tls/tls_device.c:374:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'sk_should_enter_memory_pressure'; did you mean 'tcp_enter_memory_pressure'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
374 | if (sk_should_enter_memory_pressure(sk))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:57:52: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if_var'
57 | #define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
| ^~~~
net/tls/tls_device.c:374:4: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
374 | if (sk_should_enter_memory_pressure(sk))
| ^~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +374 net/tls/tls_device.c
363
364 static int tls_do_allocation(struct sock *sk,
365 struct tls_offload_context_tx *offload_ctx,
366 struct page_frag *pfrag,
367 size_t prepend_size)
368 {
369 int ret;
370
371 if (!offload_ctx->open_record) {
372 if (unlikely(!skb_page_frag_refill(prepend_size, pfrag,
373 sk->sk_allocation))) {
> 374 if (sk_should_enter_memory_pressure(sk))
375 READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot)->enter_memory_pressure(sk);
376 sk_stream_moderate_sndbuf(sk);
377 return -ENOMEM;
378 }
379
380 ret = tls_create_new_record(offload_ctx, pfrag, prepend_size);
381 if (ret)
382 return ret;
383
384 if (pfrag->size > pfrag->offset)
385 return 0;
386 }
387
388 if (!sk_page_frag_refill(sk, pfrag))
389 return -ENOMEM;
390
391 return 0;
392 }
393
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-12 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-11 17:30 [PATCH v2 net-next 00/12] net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-08-11 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 01/12] mptcp: Fix up subflow's memcg when CONFIG_SOCK_CGROUP_DATA=n Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-08-11 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 02/12] mptcp: Use tcp_under_memory_pressure() in mptcp_epollin_ready() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-08-11 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 03/12] tcp: Simplify error path in inet_csk_accept() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-08-11 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 04/12] net: Call trace_sock_exceed_buf_limit() for memcg failure with SK_MEM_RECV Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-08-11 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 05/12] net: Clean up __sk_mem_raise_allocated() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-08-11 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 06/12] net-memcg: Introduce mem_cgroup_from_sk() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-08-11 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 07/12] net-memcg: Introduce mem_cgroup_sk_enabled() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-08-11 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 08/12] net-memcg: Pass struct sock to mem_cgroup_sk_(un)?charge() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-08-11 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 09/12] net-memcg: Pass struct sock to mem_cgroup_sk_under_memory_pressure() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-08-11 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 10/12] net: Define sk_memcg under CONFIG_MEMCG Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-08-11 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 11/12] net-memcg: Store MEMCG_SOCK_ISOLATED in sk->sk_memcg Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-08-11 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 12/12] net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from global protocol memory accounting Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-08-12 15:08 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-08-12 15:55 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-08-11 20:05 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 00/12] net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated MPTCP CI
2025-08-12 7:46 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202508122213.H31XXZsm-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.