[PATCH 11/15] drm/xe: Convert xe_dma_buf.c for exhaustive eviction

["Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>]

Convert dma-buf migration to XE_PL_TT and dma-buf import to
support exhaustive eviction, using xe_validation_guard().
It seems unlikely that the import would result in an -ENOMEM,
but convert import anyway for completeness.

The dma-buf map_attachment() functionality unfortunately doesn't
support passing a drm_exec, which means that foreign devices
validating a dma-buf that we exported will not, unless they are
xeKMD devices, participate in the exhaustive eviction scheme.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
index 78a827d4e726..56df1d84df21 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
@@ -163,16 +163,27 @@ static int xe_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dma_buf,
 	struct xe_bo *bo = gem_to_xe_bo(obj);
 	bool reads =  (direction == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL ||
 		       direction == DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
-	struct drm_exec *exec = XE_VALIDATION_UNIMPLEMENTED;
+	struct xe_validation_ctx ctx;
+	struct drm_exec exec;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!reads)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* Can we do interruptible lock here? */
-	xe_bo_lock(bo, false);
-	(void)xe_bo_migrate(bo, XE_PL_TT, exec);
-	xe_bo_unlock(bo);
-
+	xe_validation_guard(&ctx, &xe_bo_device(bo)->val, &exec, 0, ret, false) {
+		ret = drm_exec_lock_obj(&exec, &bo->ttm.base);
+		drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out;
+
+		ret = xe_bo_migrate(bo, XE_PL_TT, &exec);
+		drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
+		xe_validation_retry_on_oom(&ctx, &ret);
+	}
+out:
+	/* If we failed, cpu-access takes place in current placement. */
+	(void)ret;
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -211,24 +222,38 @@ xe_dma_buf_init_obj(struct drm_device *dev, struct xe_bo *storage,
 {
 	struct dma_resv *resv = dma_buf->resv;
 	struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(dev);
-	struct drm_exec *exec = XE_VALIDATION_UNIMPLEMENTED;
+	struct xe_validation_ctx ctx;
+	struct drm_gem_object *dummy_obj;
+	struct drm_exec exec;
 	struct xe_bo *bo;
-	int ret;
-
-	dma_resv_lock(resv, NULL);
-	bo = ___xe_bo_create_locked(xe, storage, NULL, resv, NULL, dma_buf->size,
-				    0, /* Will require 1way or 2way for vm_bind */
-				    ttm_bo_type_sg, XE_BO_FLAG_SYSTEM, exec);
-	if (IS_ERR(bo)) {
-		ret = PTR_ERR(bo);
-		goto error;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	dummy_obj = drm_gpuvm_resv_object_alloc(&xe->drm);
+	if (!dummy_obj)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+	dummy_obj->resv = resv;
+	xe_validation_guard(&ctx, &xe->val, &exec, 0, ret, false) {
+		ret = drm_exec_lock_obj(&exec, dummy_obj);
+		drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
+		if (ret)
+			goto error;
+
+		bo = ___xe_bo_create_locked(xe, storage, NULL, resv, NULL, dma_buf->size,
+					    0, /* Will require 1way or 2way for vm_bind */
+					    ttm_bo_type_sg, XE_BO_FLAG_SYSTEM, &exec);
+		drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
+		if (IS_ERR(bo)) {
+			ret = PTR_ERR(bo);
+			xe_validation_retry_on_oom(&ctx, &ret);
+			goto error;
+		}
 	}
-	dma_resv_unlock(resv);
+	drm_gem_object_put(dummy_obj);
 
 	return &bo->ttm.base;
 
 error:
-	dma_resv_unlock(resv);
 	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
 
-- 
2.50.1