From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82F882EFDAC; Wed, 13 Aug 2025 21:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755120536; cv=none; b=u5FHxX8VxDT2WeEkH1QGQm3JabmM0RebvpWBkNIuoXl3wRSX5c6jJWuOICLL1CaORwsD2V3e2ekDpCmP1/24jwie88GxFCn6tToSfNDKLI5+TAmjF1W9i4/p0QTYfnZuJf9hR31Q4CIqA/VEJHr27Vn3EA5CvDoF3IcYYUL7sZE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755120536; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zzqiWB87FyQa0pN6w8XPlzfV0xfLBOYTNruWpuHpnm4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HbxtktRQkJa5nu+rZQDhEOR3o6d52hH2UzJVeCEG1w04KFyefXazC7314k0T53gl7+3B5hIknjW3OOFgNPnpGtRUR09MPIgwo3NZdNEu7o6pYKGj/P92M5ziWdop+ct3hPbZCgVtj8xzNq+DHrYWGUKVZDBSVtB51Vrun+CXiXw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=fsIhCYHX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="fsIhCYHX" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1755120534; x=1786656534; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=zzqiWB87FyQa0pN6w8XPlzfV0xfLBOYTNruWpuHpnm4=; b=fsIhCYHXKpiIknupzkZavnLHR572kF93e7Wv93wPlmSdztExAV2cpEmW v2yqEo7wCq5qpowc2I2Q8l/q+diNO1zTUd/Y11Kw+YW1WnYO78UEx3zC8 HY/j7lGnfUMyfdJ+lg0JJYooIfb3lgbrwIkvkCQvoDfSKMOKorr2ONtfK 0End21sParbx+LZk08gBGyHwkV/EtkwhBfSuCwD3GTgWlTuuHS3LWrYtg FZZ7sVWNtIc0p7E8HIPCFSCD99E/LnxhbxYNfewcV6/7g4arL4Kh/ud5x 9C92ur9fCBT0DQ0fuLH7J04JLTmbdgGoeoHI9eaTonQ2fg9dmIgK3JKM/ Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +uHgcBtETkyH/tHL/X/4zA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: lb834kxUSgKwKuFxMjwojg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11520"; a="56642689" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,287,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="56642689" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Aug 2025 14:28:54 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 48PBhMurSmOLe5EQRyQu2g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +Ffc00+5TZuZ8Q0pPlYbdQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,287,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="166957056" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 4ea60e6ab079) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Aug 2025 14:28:51 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 4ea60e6ab079 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1umJ1d-000AKe-0f; Wed, 13 Aug 2025 21:28:49 +0000 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 05:28:09 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Chen Ridong , tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com, longman@redhat.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huawei.com, christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr Subject: Re: [-next v2 3/4] cpuset: separate tmpmasks and cpuset allocation logic Message-ID: <202508140524.S2O4D57k-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250813082904.1091651-4-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250813082904.1091651-4-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> Hi Chen, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on tj-cgroup/for-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.17-rc1 next-20250813] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chen-Ridong/cpuset-remove-redundant-CS_ONLINE-flag/20250813-164651 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250813082904.1091651-4-chenridong%40huaweicloud.com patch subject: [-next v2 3/4] cpuset: separate tmpmasks and cpuset allocation logic config: x86_64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250814/202508140524.S2O4D57k-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-12) 11.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250814/202508140524.S2O4D57k-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202508140524.S2O4D57k-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> Warning: kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:422 function parameter 'pmasks' not described in 'alloc_cpumasks' -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki