From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B0CCCA0EE4 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 20:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB0F3CC71C for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 22:41:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 039353C06B5 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 22:41:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8E8260240B for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 22:41:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB2841F453; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 20:02:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1755547335; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=y+auqnjggHVAQRLBWPSG9sJydxmLzxwNTkkpqwglif8=; b=RMyInwxaLuTxbxPLUkbQ7Moq+TzfaZ2F+g9zZvrdtA3EcqmIpc06GJhF/TR+gey9RqUa3G qX+HtaCZ1KCei+mApg443IkvGKBdGLG3CSeMZ7rfSFeDe2LbDrFFdVqoBDcpfjLWHE46To sSr7XQKneki4kZF6D8Otl5v2xKyCXlI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1755547335; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=y+auqnjggHVAQRLBWPSG9sJydxmLzxwNTkkpqwglif8=; b=ePzW4GBURB4bO/x1WbfcHk96mMyIncLaVfG/WwbLQ+tL7VLO6REtKKdvqa2zMWkp2vkR/r 9ow11HeKXoAl4eAw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1755547334; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=y+auqnjggHVAQRLBWPSG9sJydxmLzxwNTkkpqwglif8=; b=F/ufllJoa9F9V/qLHkgdcmGm70pAZD2D5j/IQ1LC2jasiwFlf+PyO0tYF70+iD7VjSsNKd oGPIO1GVSTK+GqemZi0GMRZ8lTUaESWK5q50hwWE0BGMYQKe4C2RkUMViljxiJlCT3Nyip iCqxF47XpJK+fth/yuRtXF5Lbt+yKcE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1755547334; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=y+auqnjggHVAQRLBWPSG9sJydxmLzxwNTkkpqwglif8=; b=tfV7uGFixHx4x1WV7pPqi1czdI6DA9A6ouQ3M0O3tVHI4WZvcwGZ/wKneLRFjDde1ACfkk KMVgr0eezAs96sBg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61E3F13A55; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 20:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id UFrmDMaGo2hvegAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 18 Aug 2025 20:02:14 +0000 Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 22:02:10 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Pedro Falcato Message-ID: <20250818200210.GA178161@pevik> References: <20250814152659.1368713-1-florian.schmaus@codasip.com> <20250818130038.GA21418@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.50 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.999]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.de:email,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.cz:email,suse.cz:replyto]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.de:email,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3] sigrelse01: Select signals based on SIGRTMIN/SIGRTMAX for musl compat X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Florian, Pedro, > On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 03:00:38PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote: > > Hi Florian, Pedro, > > > This avoids selecting signal 34 when the test is run using > > > musl. Signal 34 is used internally by musl as SIGSYNCCALL. > > > Consequently, musl's signal() will return with an error status and > > > errno set to EINVAL when trying to setup a signal handler for signal > > > 34, causing the sigrelse01 test to fail. > > +1, now it works on both glibc and musl (and hopefully in the rest of libc). > > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel > > Tested-by: Petr Vorel > > > Thanks to Pedro Falcato for suggesting using SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX for > > > this check. > > nit: @Florian instead of the above I'll add: > > Suggested-by: Pedro Falcato > > @Pedro Can I merge with your RBT? > Assuming you mean Reviewed-by, yep, all fine by me. Thank you both! Patch merged. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp