From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: track the number of blocks in each buftarg
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 13:48:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250818204830.GY7965@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250818051155.1486253-2-hch@lst.de>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 07:11:23AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Add a bt_nr_blocks to track the number of blocks in each buftarg, and
> replace the check that hard codes sb_dblock in xfs_buf_map_verify with
> this new value so that it is correct for non-ddev buftargs. The
> RT buftarg only has a superblock in the first block, so it is unlikely
> to trigger this, or are we likely to ever have enough blocks in the
> in-memory buftargs, but we might as well get the check right.
>
> Fixes: 10616b806d1d ("xfs: fix _xfs_buf_find oops on blocks beyond the filesystem end")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h | 4 +++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item_recover.c | 7 +++++++
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 7 ++++---
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 21 +++++++++----------
> 5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index f9ef3b2a332a..b9b89f1243a0 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ xfs_buf_map_verify(
> * Corrupted block numbers can get through to here, unfortunately, so we
> * have to check that the buffer falls within the filesystem bounds.
> */
> - eofs = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(btp->bt_mount, btp->bt_mount->m_sb.sb_dblocks);
> + eofs = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(btp->bt_mount, btp->bt_nr_blocks);
> if (map->bm_bn < 0 || map->bm_bn >= eofs) {
> xfs_alert(btp->bt_mount,
> "%s: daddr 0x%llx out of range, EOFS 0x%llx",
> @@ -1720,26 +1720,27 @@ xfs_configure_buftarg_atomic_writes(
> int
> xfs_configure_buftarg(
> struct xfs_buftarg *btp,
> - unsigned int sectorsize)
> -{
> - int error;
> + unsigned int sectorsize,
> + xfs_rfsblock_t nr_blocks)
> +{
> + if (btp->bt_bdev) {
> + int error;
> +
> + error = bdev_validate_blocksize(btp->bt_bdev, sectorsize);
> + if (error) {
> + xfs_warn(btp->bt_mount,
> + "Cannot use blocksize %u on device %pg, err %d",
> + sectorsize, btp->bt_bdev, error);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> - ASSERT(btp->bt_bdev != NULL);
> + if (bdev_can_atomic_write(btp->bt_bdev))
> + xfs_configure_buftarg_atomic_writes(btp);
> + }
>
> - /* Set up metadata sector size info */
> btp->bt_meta_sectorsize = sectorsize;
> btp->bt_meta_sectormask = sectorsize - 1;
> -
> - error = bdev_validate_blocksize(btp->bt_bdev, sectorsize);
> - if (error) {
> - xfs_warn(btp->bt_mount,
> - "Cannot use blocksize %u on device %pg, err %d",
> - sectorsize, btp->bt_bdev, error);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - if (bdev_can_atomic_write(btp->bt_bdev))
> - xfs_configure_buftarg_atomic_writes(btp);
> + btp->bt_nr_blocks = nr_blocks;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1749,6 +1750,9 @@ xfs_init_buftarg(
> size_t logical_sectorsize,
> const char *descr)
> {
> + /* The maximum size of the buftarg is only known once the sb is read. */
> + btp->bt_nr_blocks = (xfs_rfsblock_t)-1;
> +
> /* Set up device logical sector size mask */
> btp->bt_logical_sectorsize = logical_sectorsize;
> btp->bt_logical_sectormask = logical_sectorsize - 1;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
> index b269e115d9ac..a9b3def89cfb 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ struct xfs_buftarg {
> size_t bt_meta_sectormask;
> size_t bt_logical_sectorsize;
> size_t bt_logical_sectormask;
> + xfs_rfsblock_t bt_nr_blocks;
>
> /* LRU control structures */
> struct shrinker *bt_shrinker;
> @@ -372,7 +373,8 @@ struct xfs_buftarg *xfs_alloc_buftarg(struct xfs_mount *mp,
> extern void xfs_free_buftarg(struct xfs_buftarg *);
> extern void xfs_buftarg_wait(struct xfs_buftarg *);
> extern void xfs_buftarg_drain(struct xfs_buftarg *);
> -int xfs_configure_buftarg(struct xfs_buftarg *btp, unsigned int sectorsize);
> +int xfs_configure_buftarg(struct xfs_buftarg *btp, unsigned int sectorsize,
> + xfs_rfsblock_t nr_blocks);
>
> #define xfs_readonly_buftarg(buftarg) bdev_read_only((buftarg)->bt_bdev)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item_recover.c
> index 5d58e2ae4972..d43234e04174 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item_recover.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item_recover.c
> @@ -736,6 +736,13 @@ xlog_recover_do_primary_sb_buffer(
> */
> xfs_sb_from_disk(&mp->m_sb, dsb);
>
> + /*
> + * Grow can change the device size. Mirror that into the buftarg.
> + */
> + mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_nr_blocks = mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks;
> + if (mp->m_rtdev_targp && mp->m_rtdev_targp != mp->m_ddev_targp)
> + mp->m_rtdev_targp->bt_nr_blocks = mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks;
> +
> if (mp->m_sb.sb_agcount < orig_agcount) {
> xfs_alert(mp, "Shrinking AG count in log recovery not supported");
> return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index bb0a82635a77..78f0c4707c22 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -541,7 +541,8 @@ xfs_setup_devices(
> {
> int error;
>
> - error = xfs_configure_buftarg(mp->m_ddev_targp, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize);
> + error = xfs_configure_buftarg(mp->m_ddev_targp, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize,
> + mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks);
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> @@ -551,7 +552,7 @@ xfs_setup_devices(
> if (xfs_has_sector(mp))
> log_sector_size = mp->m_sb.sb_logsectsize;
> error = xfs_configure_buftarg(mp->m_logdev_targp,
> - log_sector_size);
> + log_sector_size, mp->m_sb.sb_logblocks);
> if (error)
> return error;
> }
> @@ -565,7 +566,7 @@ xfs_setup_devices(
> mp->m_rtdev_targp = mp->m_ddev_targp;
> } else if (mp->m_rtname) {
> error = xfs_configure_buftarg(mp->m_rtdev_targp,
> - mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize);
> + mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize, mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks);
> if (error)
> return error;
> }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> index 575e7028f423..584bd725ef18 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> @@ -452,19 +452,17 @@ xfs_trans_mod_sb(
> */
> STATIC void
> xfs_trans_apply_sb_deltas(
> - xfs_trans_t *tp)
> + struct xfs_trans *tp)
> {
> - struct xfs_dsb *sbp;
> - struct xfs_buf *bp;
> - int whole = 0;
> -
> - bp = xfs_trans_getsb(tp);
> - sbp = bp->b_addr;
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = tp->t_mountp;
> + struct xfs_buf *bp = xfs_trans_getsb(tp);
> + struct xfs_dsb *sbp = bp->b_addr;
> + int whole = 0;
>
> /*
> * Only update the superblock counters if we are logging them
> */
> - if (!xfs_has_lazysbcount((tp->t_mountp))) {
> + if (!xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp)) {
> if (tp->t_icount_delta)
> be64_add_cpu(&sbp->sb_icount, tp->t_icount_delta);
> if (tp->t_ifree_delta)
> @@ -491,8 +489,7 @@ xfs_trans_apply_sb_deltas(
> * write the correct value ondisk.
> */
> if ((tp->t_frextents_delta || tp->t_res_frextents_delta) &&
> - !xfs_has_rtgroups(tp->t_mountp)) {
> - struct xfs_mount *mp = tp->t_mountp;
> + !xfs_has_rtgroups(mp)) {
> int64_t rtxdelta;
>
> rtxdelta = tp->t_frextents_delta + tp->t_res_frextents_delta;
> @@ -505,6 +502,7 @@ xfs_trans_apply_sb_deltas(
>
> if (tp->t_dblocks_delta) {
> be64_add_cpu(&sbp->sb_dblocks, tp->t_dblocks_delta);
> + mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_nr_blocks += tp->t_dblocks_delta;
> whole = 1;
> }
> if (tp->t_agcount_delta) {
> @@ -524,7 +522,7 @@ xfs_trans_apply_sb_deltas(
> * recompute the ondisk rtgroup block log. The incore values
> * will be recomputed in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb.
> */
> - if (xfs_has_rtgroups(tp->t_mountp)) {
> + if (xfs_has_rtgroups(mp)) {
> sbp->sb_rgblklog = xfs_compute_rgblklog(
> be32_to_cpu(sbp->sb_rgextents),
> be32_to_cpu(sbp->sb_rextsize));
> @@ -537,6 +535,7 @@ xfs_trans_apply_sb_deltas(
> }
> if (tp->t_rblocks_delta) {
> be64_add_cpu(&sbp->sb_rblocks, tp->t_rblocks_delta);
> + mp->m_rtdev_targp->bt_nr_blocks += tp->t_dblocks_delta;
Should this be += tp->t_rblocks_delta here?
--D
> whole = 1;
> }
> if (tp->t_rextents_delta) {
> --
> 2.47.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-18 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-18 5:11 store the buftarg size in the buftarg Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-18 5:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: track the number of blocks in each buftarg Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-18 20:48 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-08-19 8:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-18 5:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: use bt_nr_blocks in xfs_dax_translate_range Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-18 20:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-08-25 11:19 store the buftarg size in the buftarg v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-25 11:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: track the number of blocks in each buftarg Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-25 15:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-26 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-26 5:42 ` Dave Chinner
2025-08-26 13:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-16 13:52 store the buftarg size in the buftarg v3 Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-16 13:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: track the number of blocks in each buftarg Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-17 21:26 ` Dave Chinner
2025-09-19 13:12 store the buftarg size in the buftarg v4 Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-19 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: track the number of blocks in each buftarg Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-19 17:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-13 5:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-13 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-13 14:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250818204830.GY7965@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.