All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	olsajiri@gmail.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, dxu@dxuuu.xyz, deso@posteo.net,
	leon.hwang@linux.dev, kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/6] bpf: Introduce internal check_map_flags helper function
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:08:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250821160817.70285-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250821160817.70285-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>

It is to unify map flags checking for lookup, update, lookup_batch and
update_batch.

Therefore, it will be convenient to check BPF_F_CPU flag in this helper
function for them in next patch.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 0fbfa8532c392..19f7f5de5e7dc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1654,6 +1654,17 @@ static void *___bpf_copy_key(bpfptr_t ukey, u64 key_size)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static int check_map_flags(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, bool check_flag)
+{
+	if (check_flag && (flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if ((flags & BPF_F_LOCK) && !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /* last field in 'union bpf_attr' used by this command */
 #define BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM_LAST_FIELD flags
 
@@ -1669,9 +1680,6 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (attr->flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	CLASS(fd, f)(attr->map_fd);
 	map = __bpf_map_get(f);
 	if (IS_ERR(map))
@@ -1679,9 +1687,9 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (!(map_get_sys_perms(map, f) & FMODE_CAN_READ))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	if ((attr->flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
-	    !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	err = check_map_flags(map, attr->flags, true);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	key = __bpf_copy_key(ukey, map->key_size);
 	if (IS_ERR(key))
@@ -1744,11 +1752,9 @@ static int map_update_elem(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
 		goto err_put;
 	}
 
-	if ((attr->flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
-	    !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK)) {
-		err = -EINVAL;
+	err = check_map_flags(map, attr->flags, false);
+	if (err)
 		goto err_put;
-	}
 
 	key = ___bpf_copy_key(ukey, map->key_size);
 	if (IS_ERR(key)) {
@@ -1952,13 +1958,9 @@ int generic_map_update_batch(struct bpf_map *map, struct file *map_file,
 	void *key, *value;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (attr->batch.elem_flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if ((attr->batch.elem_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
-	    !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK)) {
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
+	err = check_map_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags, true);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
 
@@ -2015,12 +2017,9 @@ int generic_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
 	u32 value_size, cp, max_count;
 	int err;
 
-	if (attr->batch.elem_flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if ((attr->batch.elem_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
-	    !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	err = check_map_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags, true);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
 
-- 
2.50.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-21 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-21 16:08 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/6] Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2025-08-21 16:08 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2025-08-22 22:14   ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/6] bpf: Introduce internal check_map_flags helper function Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-26 15:24     ` Leon Hwang
2025-08-26 22:50       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-21 16:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/6] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag for percpu_array maps Leon Hwang
2025-08-22 22:14   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-26 14:45     ` Leon Hwang
2025-08-21 16:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/6] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps Leon Hwang
2025-08-22 22:14   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-26 15:14     ` Leon Hwang
2025-08-21 16:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/6] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag for percpu_cgroup_storage maps Leon Hwang
2025-08-21 16:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/6] libbpf: Support BPF_F_CPU for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2025-08-22 22:20   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-26 15:35     ` Leon Hwang
2025-08-26 22:50       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-21 16:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add cases to test BPF_F_CPU flag Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250821160817.70285-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=deso@posteo.net \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
    --cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.