From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from antaris-organics.com (mail.antaris-organics.com [91.227.220.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1FA92FFDEB; Fri, 22 Aug 2025 14:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.227.220.155 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755874186; cv=none; b=SlkvHW7Uww+sj8ZIegNW+7qAwoLLeQLgRTZlU60T1GbyWqL4PuF+S02ywXLZlouOTnVdkKFwafCMDNCDhKA+zBMNjNDDdnEtpbswA5Wugt5M2sHCCnL3KFUA60d57yfBUxjGtvnuuhMIJAk54D4pSS6iIeCJ1xH1ASagMZCBJyo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755874186; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GIDIl+j0MQNyBJElXtNqrbuR0HomtwPGNlTw2Z4Kp3I=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gwsg9IRe9VTZwTakMPQObHSqrJDsRquccnpwoxn/NHZIpbMd0iVz8gsOwMcjZIoreUO6bkuD4UdT4oRBilq2PpGoocYtjkt2dlUgl+1MPp36I7hnwqCnAX2xQxMV9cEOvrE5+uNL/fhJqboJ+Sb1sA71ZzUqY/yRUBT1YEidKOI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=mareichelt.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mareichelt.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mareichelt.com header.i=@mareichelt.com header.b=EtrI+I5f; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.227.220.155 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=mareichelt.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mareichelt.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mareichelt.com header.i=@mareichelt.com header.b="EtrI+I5f" Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:49:37 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mareichelt.com; s=202107; t=1755874175; bh=GIDIl+j0MQNyBJElXtNqrbuR0HomtwPGNlTw2Z4Kp3I=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Cc:Cc:content-type:content-type:date:date: From:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version: mime-version:references:reply-to:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To; b=EtrI+I5fEJR1agQyd9XRn/HwGvo02Pq/OtNFMIiWl3UQMaC9lTZSnxlB5OZULnacy KVwiEEnHNIfZUOg21GgeJmw8p61S7LrwOEi4tO/ktDvw5hg2k+WfEBDniKlYE4/86e 65kicedZKmvgWdg5lDtY2BNnNZZZKeh5dHl3ZzNIQv2EiIpXsBobLf+aui7vSxb9nZ d0sDlosgg4/2k/EWTkzqMDg2p8VEaYF4IJBr3xYzP5F44PmnbR17801Azfe5lU1Ieu Fv7xhowUz8M+XrYNv1XjIDRUPqfALLuntQY9VZXgrdOpjcl3f4jx1OMmK1O3sYG+RL EwUFJTjjYIReg== From: Markus Reichelt To: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.16 0/9] 6.16.3-rc1 review Message-ID: <20250822144937.GF2771@pc21.mareichelt.com> Mail-Followup-To: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20250822123516.780248736@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250822123516.780248736@linuxfoundation.org> * Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.16.3 release. > There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Hi Greg 6.16.3-rc1 compiles on x86_64 (Xeon E5-1620 v2, Slackware64-15.0), and boots & runs on x86_64 (AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, Slackware64-current). No regressions observed, apart from the one already mentioned for 6.16.2-rc1. Thus I tested 6.16.3-rc1 with V3 of the patch and it seems to work ok: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20250821105806.1453833-1-wangzijie1@honor.com/ Tested-by: Markus Reichelt