From: Nikolaos Gkarlis <nickgarlis@gmail.com>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de,
Nikolaos Gkarlis <nickgarlis@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: nft_ct: reject ambiguous conntrack expressions in inet tables
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:50:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250829065011.12936-1-nickgarlis@gmail.com> (raw)
The kernel accepts netlink messages using the legacy NFT_CT_SRC,
NFT_CT_DST keys in inet tables, creating ambiguous conntrack expressions
that cannot be properly evaluated during packet processing.
When NFPROTO_INET is used with NFT_CT_SRC, NFT_CT_DST the register size
calculation defaults to IPv6 (16 bytes) regardless of the actual packet
family.
This causes two issues:
1. For IPv4 packets, only 4 bytes contain valid address data while 12
bytes contain uninitialized memory during comparison.
2. nft userspace cannot properly display these rules ([invalid type]).
The bug is not reproducible through standard nft commands, which
properly use NFT_CT_SRC_IP(6), NFT_CT_DST_IP(6) keys instead.
Fix by rejecting such expressions with EAFNOSUPPORT when used in inet
tables.
Signed-off-by: Nikolaos Gkarlis <nickgarlis@gmail.com>
---
As an example, packets from 192.0.2.1 (0xc0000201) would also match
rules filtering on c000:201:: (0xc0000201000000000000000000000000),
which is likely unintended. To my knowledge, the keys NFT_CT_SRC and
NFT_CT_DST were never officially used by nft userspace, so I assume
rejecting them should be safe. I have tested this change and it appears
to work as expected.
net/netfilter/nft_ct.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c b/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
index d526e69a2..23ce90975 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
@@ -439,7 +439,6 @@ static int nft_ct_get_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
src.u3.ip);
break;
case NFPROTO_IPV6:
- case NFPROTO_INET:
len = sizeof_field(struct nf_conntrack_tuple,
src.u3.ip6);
break;
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-08-29 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-29 6:50 Nikolaos Gkarlis [this message]
2025-08-29 15:08 ` [PATCH] netfilter: nft_ct: reject ambiguous conntrack expressions in inet tables Florian Westphal
2025-08-29 21:59 ` Nick Garlis
2025-09-02 21:54 ` [PATCH v2] " Nikolaos Gkarlis
2025-09-02 22:21 ` Florian Westphal
2025-09-03 9:12 ` Nick Garlis
2025-09-03 10:13 ` Florian Westphal
2025-09-03 10:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-09-03 11:51 ` Nikolaos Gkarlis
2025-09-03 10:31 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-09-03 13:18 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-03 17:47 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci
2025-09-03 17:56 ` [PATCH v2] " kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250829065011.12936-1-nickgarlis@gmail.com \
--to=nickgarlis@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.