From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Anton Nadezhdin <anton.nadezhdin@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
Milena Olech <milena.olech@intel.com>,
Anton Nadezhdin <anton.nadezhdin@intel.com>,
Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next 2/2] idpf: add direct method for disciplining Tx timestamping
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 22:06:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202509022155.uBpemgov-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250902105321.5750-3-anton.nadezhdin@intel.com>
Hi Anton,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on 1235d14de922bc4367c24553bc6b278d56dc3433]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anton-Nadezhdin/idpf-add-direct-access-to-discipline-the-main-timer/20250902-170325
base: 1235d14de922bc4367c24553bc6b278d56dc3433
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250902105321.5750-3-anton.nadezhdin%40intel.com
patch subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next 2/2] idpf: add direct method for disciplining Tx timestamping
config: powerpc-randconfig-002-20250902 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250902/202509022155.uBpemgov-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: powerpc-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250902/202509022155.uBpemgov-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202509022155.uBpemgov-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c:5:
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ptp.h:399:11: error: expected ';', ',' or ')' before 'struct'
struct idpf_tx_splitq_params *params)
^~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c: In function 'idpf_tx_read_tstamp':
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c:1673:10: error: too many arguments to function 'idpf_ptp_get_tx_tstamp'
err = idpf_ptp_get_tx_tstamp(tx_tstamp_caps->vport, tx_tstamp);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c:5:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ptp.h:374:19: note: declared here
static inline int idpf_ptp_get_tx_tstamp(struct idpf_vport *vport)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c: In function 'idpf_tx_splitq_frame':
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c:2763:34: error: passing argument 3 of 'idpf_tx_tstamp' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
idx = idpf_tx_tstamp(tx_q, skb, &tx_params);
^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c:2635:37: note: expected 'struct idpf_tx_offload_params *' but argument is of type 'struct idpf_tx_splitq_params *'
struct idpf_tx_offload_params *params)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_lib.c:6:
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ptp.h:399:11: error: expected ';', ',' or ')' before 'struct'
struct idpf_tx_splitq_params *params)
^~~~~~
vim +399 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ptp.h
396
397 static inline int idpf_ptp_request_ts(struct idpf_tx_queue *tx_q,
398 struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *idx
> 399 struct idpf_tx_splitq_params *params)
400 {
401 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
402 }
403
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-02 10:50 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next 0/2] idpf: add direct access for PHC control Anton Nadezhdin
2025-09-02 10:50 ` Anton Nadezhdin
2025-09-02 10:50 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next 1/2] idpf: add direct access to discipline the main timer Anton Nadezhdin
2025-09-02 10:50 ` Anton Nadezhdin
2025-09-02 11:05 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2025-09-02 11:05 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-09-11 16:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Naman Gulati
2025-09-11 16:02 ` Naman Gulati
2025-09-02 10:50 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next 2/2] idpf: add direct method for disciplining Tx timestamping Anton Nadezhdin
2025-09-02 10:50 ` Anton Nadezhdin
2025-09-02 11:27 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2025-09-02 11:27 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-09-02 14:06 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202509022155.uBpemgov-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=anton.nadezhdin@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=milena.olech@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.