From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E03A15D3 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 00:32:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756945926; cv=none; b=Yth1wtBe9Ew+iLdymuC3mqHcsIYhnNCIVv+6GB4edNm1+d81Rya/twSEL6CpkQBJxfF+sRdVeMZyQuU5QqHvP1HmEk62pVV2ueAhiLmfsNrQN9E83B2aiI4jQac2ZBn/Ac3VxMp/VNI65WyT7vn2nMKVmDLZlA7S6hu4m1SFBrM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756945926; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vNBrxYioIH6NH17+QE2EEh0a9ZdygTBpYzjwNaFeqHc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=S7qFcqlGTu2DDxUvgaiAXg6qjMfTAmJHclBVTbeoY5pDmqp3w5riycS9fszOUEV7k0Xeu9eD2fS/cUMQk1yeAw6sbJeYdux3d7LvXG5cnrxx+ycc8ZOXoW0FPIHb+7JQmmu3Z6N1n8RpkTL/mv5NZhEbrmdl9JefilJI8MBYl7I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=rSDO2SU4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="rSDO2SU4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A708BC4CEE7; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 00:32:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1756945926; bh=vNBrxYioIH6NH17+QE2EEh0a9ZdygTBpYzjwNaFeqHc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rSDO2SU4+ZpZbvGYR2aTv5eOQrZZWMFALXfy5lPQO9M2axxWapKD8FbtcdaSrSwOI /96W7fpkegWYepvtmbhzuPNaTLe49tc49F/5s+drN0pJcd0x7Df+wX37t/JByhxnCx 9e1LEALJjENlNSJTpW1Z+NOjiqpphZpH2FkF3OyVyLA/2NLidT1yjDVWobssOXCUEA OjMOg73xzujfaw/e2G2byf4aupvejlEo2UIutNU51RwM/Rj7kO2uZzOSzCfUiq6+25 JKC1FZrNlmIrYH0C3QpJ431MalK6a5jI3ZiNecOrevGLgMqORY67NggG1Zxyn+IKTp /IAn9d6f9JGEw== Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 17:32:04 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Heiner Kallweit Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Andrew Lunn , Andrew Lunn , Paolo Abeni , Eric Dumazet , David Miller , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: phy: fixed_phy: remove link gpio support Message-ID: <20250903173204.3ca4969e@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <230c1f83-6dac-484a-bc80-e62260e56e74@gmail.com> References: <230c1f83-6dac-484a-bc80-e62260e56e74@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2 Sep 2025 20:37:02 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote: > The only user of fixed_phy gpio functionality was here: > arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/vf/vf610-zii-dev-rev-b.dts > Support for the switch on this board was migrated to phylink > (DSA - mv88e6xxx) years ago, so the functionality is unused now. > Therefore remove it. Sorry if I'm mixing things up and misunderstanding. There was a recent conversation regarding backward compat with device trees. Was it related to this patch? Is the policy that we only care about in-tree device trees? Would it make sense to document in the commit message?