From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71EBA290F for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 01:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757035748; cv=none; b=kTT7JqN++vhChaBsVYczqnCtJRRRqmtkeLkbD7dOlTrN2C82wCBJAdAmhZaNwomxPx+I5aPOtCfB0yQDshjRDw7kmvUXjHJdbCGfP/6ggWuiT4V/NdRLSyUKH1UmrsNPGTII2+hHPGTwXUPXhMFR8JWVZkClZdzUXM6FtfaM6XA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757035748; c=relaxed/simple; bh=apYt/RuG1dxwC+vaFYcQvngOjxhlr0AR0XVwImYctrE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AxoGVKSQPC3kK34dFszoJsV5yW1CfszjvFzkWKMEcQNOOTvEsOiZ3Q8opkWxezQ0Osx8ctAmWrIYX0jxUnIwvlbdBVCz8p9iEtmS4VAaepshx7oy39+gc5BHAJ1Ffr0Lwx6CyOamdkh7MshY+8xtbdqvsO8nEPOU1acTlLdSP74= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SKcHXJVl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SKcHXJVl" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA0E4C4CEF0; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 01:29:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757035747; bh=apYt/RuG1dxwC+vaFYcQvngOjxhlr0AR0XVwImYctrE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SKcHXJVlV7XomvDlKGybrlDD5pWL8JgdnXdUcYghyAZq39520QYZ6+0Jv59Z5zh6/ 790Xx00mtCHAWJC3i/DiHi8AZwx99V5ehGItKH3uDAYeJjNSKAYn79Crlfr/gGROKz TEMuxRJp6y7bi497KVjQ4pbJadhUEyX8CAtYcn3+GGHW/OyOfn8EmsiXJod4kOEm0e 0t5Oqh0uq/hjOLEnTeBhJlPFGFAOI+A7XfaJHRPMIVhFq+Msx0BK2ZA4hiXHodrgfW 0Z1Di4DfSqem1OfUyUq2jSHeCn7kvOl/KSTx9K1b17gZTgJ8GCqpcOMv0F3uYq4FRv VxLNDXXgj3LiA== Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 18:29:07 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: bernd@bsbernd.com, neal@gompa.dev, John@groves.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, joannelkoong@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] fuse: update file mode when updating acls Message-ID: <20250905012907.GB1587915@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <175573708506.15537.385109193523731230.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <175573708651.15537.17340709280148279543.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20250903175114.GG1587915@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 12:49:23PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sept 2025 at 19:51, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > As suggested in the thread for the next patch, maybe I should just hide > > this new acl behavior behind (fc->iomap || sb->s_bdev != NULL)? > > Okay, but please create a fc->is_local_fs that is set on the above > condition to make this more readable. Done. --D > Thanks, > Miklos >