From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@ti.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
Jaakko Karrenpalo <jkarrenpalo@gmail.com>,
Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@riseup.net>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>,
WingMan Kwok <w-kwok2@ti.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@gmail.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCHv3 net 1/3] hsr: use rtnl lock when iterating over ports
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 09:15:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250905091533.377443-2-liuhangbin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250905091533.377443-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com>
hsr_for_each_port is called in many places without holding the RCU read
lock, this may trigger warnings on debug kernels. Most of the callers
are actually hold rtnl lock. So add a new helper hsr_for_each_port_rtnl
to allow callers in suitable contexts to iterate ports safely without
explicit RCU locking.
This patch only fixed the callers that is hold rtnl lock. Other caller
issues will be fixed in later patches.
Fixes: c5a759117210 ("net/hsr: Use list_head (and rcu) instead of array for slave devices.")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
---
net/hsr/hsr_device.c | 18 +++++++++---------
net/hsr/hsr_main.c | 2 +-
net/hsr/hsr_main.h | 3 +++
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_device.c b/net/hsr/hsr_device.c
index 88657255fec1..bce7b4061ce0 100644
--- a/net/hsr/hsr_device.c
+++ b/net/hsr/hsr_device.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static bool hsr_check_carrier(struct hsr_port *master)
ASSERT_RTNL();
- hsr_for_each_port(master->hsr, port) {
+ hsr_for_each_port_rtnl(master->hsr, port) {
if (port->type != HSR_PT_MASTER && is_slave_up(port->dev)) {
netif_carrier_on(master->dev);
return true;
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ int hsr_get_max_mtu(struct hsr_priv *hsr)
struct hsr_port *port;
mtu_max = ETH_DATA_LEN;
- hsr_for_each_port(hsr, port)
+ hsr_for_each_port_rtnl(hsr, port)
if (port->type != HSR_PT_MASTER)
mtu_max = min(port->dev->mtu, mtu_max);
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static int hsr_dev_open(struct net_device *dev)
hsr = netdev_priv(dev);
- hsr_for_each_port(hsr, port) {
+ hsr_for_each_port_rtnl(hsr, port) {
if (port->type == HSR_PT_MASTER)
continue;
switch (port->type) {
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int hsr_dev_close(struct net_device *dev)
struct hsr_priv *hsr;
hsr = netdev_priv(dev);
- hsr_for_each_port(hsr, port) {
+ hsr_for_each_port_rtnl(hsr, port) {
if (port->type == HSR_PT_MASTER)
continue;
switch (port->type) {
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static netdev_features_t hsr_features_recompute(struct hsr_priv *hsr,
* may become enabled.
*/
features &= ~NETIF_F_ONE_FOR_ALL;
- hsr_for_each_port(hsr, port)
+ hsr_for_each_port_rtnl(hsr, port)
features = netdev_increment_features(features,
port->dev->features,
mask);
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static void hsr_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
hsr = netdev_priv(dev);
- hsr_for_each_port(hsr, port) {
+ hsr_for_each_port_rtnl(hsr, port) {
if (port->type == HSR_PT_MASTER)
continue;
switch (port->type) {
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ static void hsr_change_rx_flags(struct net_device *dev, int change)
hsr = netdev_priv(dev);
- hsr_for_each_port(hsr, port) {
+ hsr_for_each_port_rtnl(hsr, port) {
if (port->type == HSR_PT_MASTER)
continue;
switch (port->type) {
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int hsr_ndo_vlan_rx_add_vid(struct net_device *dev,
hsr = netdev_priv(dev);
- hsr_for_each_port(hsr, port) {
+ hsr_for_each_port_rtnl(hsr, port) {
if (port->type == HSR_PT_MASTER ||
port->type == HSR_PT_INTERLINK)
continue;
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static int hsr_ndo_vlan_rx_kill_vid(struct net_device *dev,
hsr = netdev_priv(dev);
- hsr_for_each_port(hsr, port) {
+ hsr_for_each_port_rtnl(hsr, port) {
switch (port->type) {
case HSR_PT_SLAVE_A:
case HSR_PT_SLAVE_B:
diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_main.c b/net/hsr/hsr_main.c
index 192893c3f2ec..ac1eb1db1a52 100644
--- a/net/hsr/hsr_main.c
+++ b/net/hsr/hsr_main.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static bool hsr_slave_empty(struct hsr_priv *hsr)
{
struct hsr_port *port;
- hsr_for_each_port(hsr, port)
+ hsr_for_each_port_rtnl(hsr, port)
if (port->type != HSR_PT_MASTER)
return false;
return true;
diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_main.h b/net/hsr/hsr_main.h
index 135ec5fce019..33b0d2460c9b 100644
--- a/net/hsr/hsr_main.h
+++ b/net/hsr/hsr_main.h
@@ -224,6 +224,9 @@ struct hsr_priv {
#define hsr_for_each_port(hsr, port) \
list_for_each_entry_rcu((port), &(hsr)->ports, port_list)
+#define hsr_for_each_port_rtnl(hsr, port) \
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu((port), &(hsr)->ports, port_list, lockdep_rtnl_is_held())
+
struct hsr_port *hsr_port_get_hsr(struct hsr_priv *hsr, enum hsr_port_type pt);
/* Caller must ensure skb is a valid HSR frame */
--
2.50.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-05 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-05 9:15 [PATCHv3 net 0/3] hsr: fix lock warnings Hangbin Liu
2025-09-05 9:15 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2025-09-10 17:06 ` [PATCHv3 net 1/3] hsr: use rtnl lock when iterating over ports Simon Horman
2025-09-05 9:15 ` [PATCHv3 net 2/3] hsr: use hsr_for_each_port_rtnl in hsr_port_get_hsr Hangbin Liu
2025-09-10 17:07 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-05 9:15 ` [PATCHv3 net 3/3] hsr: hold rcu and dev lock for hsr_get_port_ndev Hangbin Liu
2025-09-10 17:09 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-11 10:00 ` [PATCHv3 net 0/3] hsr: fix lock warnings patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250905091533.377443-2-liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=danishanwar@ti.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ffmancera@riseup.net \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jkarrenpalo@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shaw.leon@gmail.com \
--cc=w-kwok2@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.