From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@google.com>,
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/test_kho: use kho_preserve_vmalloc instead of storing addresses in fdt
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2025 10:00:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250907070022.2177974-3-rppt@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250907070022.2177974-1-rppt@kernel.org>
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
KHO test stores physical addresses of the preserved folios directly in
fdt.
Use kho_preserve_vmalloc() instead of it and kho_restore_vmalloc() to
retrieve the addresses after kexec.
This makes the test more scalable from one side and adds tests coverage
for kho_preserve_vmalloc() from the other.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
---
lib/test_kho.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_kho.c b/lib/test_kho.c
index c2eb899c3b45..10045f5979a0 100644
--- a/lib/test_kho.c
+++ b/lib/test_kho.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ module_param(max_mem, long, 0644);
struct kho_test_state {
unsigned int nr_folios;
struct folio **folios;
+ phys_addr_t *folios_info;
struct folio *fdt;
__wsum csum;
};
@@ -68,13 +69,17 @@ static struct notifier_block kho_test_nb = {
static int kho_test_save_data(struct kho_test_state *state, void *fdt)
{
phys_addr_t *folios_info __free(kvfree) = NULL;
+ phys_addr_t folios_info_phys;
int err = 0;
- folios_info = kvmalloc_array(state->nr_folios, sizeof(*folios_info),
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ folios_info = vmalloc_array(state->nr_folios, sizeof(*folios_info));
if (!folios_info)
return -ENOMEM;
+ err = kho_preserve_vmalloc(folios_info, &folios_info_phys);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
for (int i = 0; i < state->nr_folios; i++) {
struct folio *folio = state->folios[i];
unsigned int order = folio_order(folio);
@@ -89,11 +94,14 @@ static int kho_test_save_data(struct kho_test_state *state, void *fdt)
err |= fdt_begin_node(fdt, "data");
err |= fdt_property(fdt, "nr_folios", &state->nr_folios,
sizeof(state->nr_folios));
- err |= fdt_property(fdt, "folios_info", folios_info,
- state->nr_folios * sizeof(*folios_info));
+ err |= fdt_property(fdt, "folios_info", &folios_info_phys,
+ sizeof(folios_info_phys));
err |= fdt_property(fdt, "csum", &state->csum, sizeof(state->csum));
err |= fdt_end_node(fdt);
+ if (!err)
+ state->folios_info = no_free_ptr(folios_info);
+
return err;
}
@@ -197,7 +205,8 @@ static int kho_test_save(void)
static int kho_test_restore_data(const void *fdt, int node)
{
const unsigned int *nr_folios;
- const phys_addr_t *folios_info;
+ const phys_addr_t *folios_info_phys;
+ phys_addr_t *folios_info;
const __wsum *old_csum;
__wsum csum = 0;
int len;
@@ -212,8 +221,12 @@ static int kho_test_restore_data(const void *fdt, int node)
if (!old_csum || len != sizeof(*old_csum))
return -EINVAL;
- folios_info = fdt_getprop(fdt, node, "folios_info", &len);
- if (!folios_info || len != sizeof(*folios_info) * *nr_folios)
+ folios_info_phys = fdt_getprop(fdt, node, "folios_info", &len);
+ if (!folios_info_phys || len != sizeof(*folios_info_phys))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ folios_info = kho_restore_vmalloc(*folios_info_phys);
+ if (!folios_info)
return -EINVAL;
for (int i = 0; i < *nr_folios; i++) {
@@ -233,6 +246,8 @@ static int kho_test_restore_data(const void *fdt, int node)
folio_put(folio);
}
+ vfree(folios_info);
+
if (csum != *old_csum)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -291,6 +306,7 @@ static void kho_test_cleanup(void)
folio_put(kho_test_state.folios[i]);
kvfree(kho_test_state.folios);
+ vfree(kho_test_state.folios_info);
}
static void __exit kho_test_exit(void)
--
2.50.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-07 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-07 7:00 [PATCH v2 0/2] kho: add support for preserving vmalloc allocations Mike Rapoport
2025-09-07 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Mike Rapoport
2025-09-07 7:00 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-09-07 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Mike Rapoport
2025-09-07 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Mike Rapoport
2025-09-07 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] lib/test_kho: use kho_preserve_vmalloc instead of storing addresses in fdt Mike Rapoport
2025-09-08 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] kho: add support for preserving vmalloc allocations Mike Rapoport
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-05 13:13 Mike Rapoport
2025-09-05 13:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/test_kho: use kho_preserve_vmalloc instead of storing addresses in fdt Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250907070022.2177974-3-rppt@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=changyuanl@google.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.