From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, leon.hwang@linux.dev,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 12:40:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250908044025.77519-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
While running './test_progs -t timer' to validate the test case from
"selftests/bpf: Introduce experimental bpf_in_interrupt()"[0] for
PREEMPT_RT, I encountered a kernel panic.
To address this, reject bpf_timer usage in the verifier when
PREEMPT_RT is enabled, and skip the corresponding timer selftests.
Changes:
v1 -> v2:
* Skip test case 'timer_interrupt'.
Links:
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250903140438.59517-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/
Leon Hwang (2):
bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT
selftests/bpf: Skip timer cases when bpf_timer is not supported
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/free_timer.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c | 8 ++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_crash.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_lockup.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_mim.c | 4 ++++
6 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
--
2.51.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-09-08 4:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-08 4:40 Leon Hwang [this message]
2025-09-08 4:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT Leon Hwang
2025-09-08 19:20 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-08 19:29 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-08 22:42 ` Peilin Ye
2025-09-08 22:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-09 9:00 ` Peilin Ye
2025-09-09 15:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-09 22:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-10 2:02 ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-10 2:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-11 16:38 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-12 2:20 ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-08 4:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Skip timer cases when bpf_timer is not supported Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250908044025.77519-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.