All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
	dengler@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, ifranzki@linux.ibm.com, agk@redhat.com,
	snitzer@kernel.org, gmazyland@gmail.com,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/7] dm-integrity: add the "offset" argument
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2025 15:16:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250908131800.256419720@debian4.vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20250908131642.385445532@debian4.vm

Make sure that the "data" argument passed to integrity_sector_checksum is
always page-aligned and add an "offset" argument that specifies the
offset from the start of the page. This will enable us to use the
asynchronous hash interface later.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/md/dm-integrity.c |   49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c	2025-08-25 15:38:52.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c	2025-08-25 15:40:31.000000000 +0200
@@ -1636,7 +1636,7 @@ static void integrity_end_io(struct bio
 }
 
 static void integrity_sector_checksum(struct dm_integrity_c *ic, sector_t sector,
-				      const char *data, char *result)
+				      const char *data, unsigned offset, char *result)
 {
 	__le64 sector_le = cpu_to_le64(sector);
 	SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(req, ic->internal_hash);
@@ -1665,7 +1665,7 @@ static void integrity_sector_checksum(st
 		goto failed;
 	}
 
-	r = crypto_shash_update(req, data, ic->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT);
+	r = crypto_shash_update(req, data + offset, ic->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT);
 	if (unlikely(r < 0)) {
 		dm_integrity_io_error(ic, "crypto_shash_update", r);
 		goto failed;
@@ -1698,6 +1698,15 @@ static void integrity_kunmap(struct dm_i
 	kunmap_local(ptr);
 }
 
+static void *integrity_identity(struct dm_integrity_c *ic, void *data)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SG
+	BUG_ON(offset_in_page(data));
+	BUG_ON(!virt_addr_valid(data));
+#endif
+	return data;
+}
+
 static noinline void integrity_recheck(struct dm_integrity_io *dio, char *checksum)
 {
 	struct bio *bio = dm_bio_from_per_bio_data(dio, sizeof(struct dm_integrity_io));
@@ -1722,6 +1731,7 @@ static noinline void integrity_recheck(s
 			sector_t alignment;
 			char *mem;
 			char *buffer = page_to_virt(page);
+			unsigned int buffer_offset;
 			int r;
 			struct dm_io_request io_req;
 			struct dm_io_region io_loc;
@@ -1739,7 +1749,7 @@ static noinline void integrity_recheck(s
 			alignment &= -alignment;
 			io_loc.sector = round_down(io_loc.sector, alignment);
 			io_loc.count += sector - io_loc.sector;
-			buffer += (sector - io_loc.sector) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
+			buffer_offset = (sector - io_loc.sector) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
 			io_loc.count = round_up(io_loc.count, alignment);
 
 			r = dm_io(&io_req, 1, &io_loc, NULL, IOPRIO_DEFAULT);
@@ -1748,7 +1758,7 @@ static noinline void integrity_recheck(s
 				goto free_ret;
 			}
 
-			integrity_sector_checksum(ic, logical_sector, buffer, checksum);
+			integrity_sector_checksum(ic, logical_sector, integrity_identity(ic, buffer), buffer_offset, checksum);
 			r = dm_integrity_rw_tag(ic, checksum, &dio->metadata_block,
 						&dio->metadata_offset, ic->tag_size, TAG_CMP);
 			if (r) {
@@ -1765,7 +1775,7 @@ static noinline void integrity_recheck(s
 			}
 
 			mem = bvec_kmap_local(&bv);
-			memcpy(mem + pos, buffer, ic->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT);
+			memcpy(mem + pos, buffer + buffer_offset, ic->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT);
 			kunmap_local(mem);
 
 			pos += ic->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT;
@@ -1852,7 +1862,7 @@ again:
 			pos = 0;
 			checksums_ptr = checksums;
 			do {
-				integrity_sector_checksum(ic, sector, mem + bv_copy.bv_offset + pos, checksums_ptr);
+				integrity_sector_checksum(ic, sector, mem, bv_copy.bv_offset + pos, checksums_ptr);
 				checksums_ptr += ic->tag_size;
 				sectors_to_process -= ic->sectors_per_block;
 				pos += ic->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT;
@@ -2123,14 +2133,16 @@ retry_kmap:
 
 				if (ic->internal_hash) {
 					unsigned int digest_size = ic->internal_hash_digestsize;
+					void *js_page = integrity_identity(ic, (char *)js - offset_in_page(js));
+					unsigned js_offset = offset_in_page(js);
 
 					if (unlikely(digest_size > ic->tag_size)) {
 						char checksums_onstack[HASH_MAX_DIGESTSIZE];
 
-						integrity_sector_checksum(ic, logical_sector, (char *)js, checksums_onstack);
+						integrity_sector_checksum(ic, logical_sector, js_page, js_offset, checksums_onstack);
 						memcpy(journal_entry_tag(ic, je), checksums_onstack, ic->tag_size);
 					} else
-						integrity_sector_checksum(ic, logical_sector, (char *)js, journal_entry_tag(ic, je));
+						integrity_sector_checksum(ic, logical_sector, js_page, js_offset, journal_entry_tag(ic, je));
 				}
 
 				journal_entry_set_sector(je, logical_sector);
@@ -2506,7 +2518,7 @@ skip_spinlock:
 			const char *mem = integrity_kmap(ic, bv.bv_page);
 			if (ic->tag_size < ic->tuple_size)
 				memset(dio->integrity_payload + pos + ic->tag_size, 0, ic->tuple_size - ic->tuple_size);
-			integrity_sector_checksum(ic, dio->bio_details.bi_iter.bi_sector, mem + bv.bv_offset, dio->integrity_payload + pos);
+			integrity_sector_checksum(ic, dio->bio_details.bi_iter.bi_sector, mem, bv.bv_offset, dio->integrity_payload + pos);
 			integrity_kunmap(ic, mem);
 			pos += ic->tuple_size;
 			bio_advance_iter_single(bio, &dio->bio_details.bi_iter, ic->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT);
@@ -2586,7 +2598,7 @@ static void dm_integrity_inline_recheck(
 		}
 		bio_put(outgoing_bio);
 
-		integrity_sector_checksum(ic, dio->bio_details.bi_iter.bi_sector, outgoing_data, digest);
+		integrity_sector_checksum(ic, dio->bio_details.bi_iter.bi_sector, integrity_identity(ic, outgoing_data), 0, digest);
 		if (unlikely(crypto_memneq(digest, dio->integrity_payload, min(ic->internal_hash_digestsize, ic->tag_size)))) {
 			DMERR_LIMIT("%pg: Checksum failed at sector 0x%llx",
 				ic->dev->bdev, dio->bio_details.bi_iter.bi_sector);
@@ -2624,7 +2636,7 @@ static int dm_integrity_end_io(struct dm
 				char digest[HASH_MAX_DIGESTSIZE];
 				struct bio_vec bv = bio_iter_iovec(bio, dio->bio_details.bi_iter);
 				char *mem = integrity_kmap(ic, bv.bv_page);
-				integrity_sector_checksum(ic, dio->bio_details.bi_iter.bi_sector, mem + bv.bv_offset, digest);
+				integrity_sector_checksum(ic, dio->bio_details.bi_iter.bi_sector, mem, bv.bv_offset, digest);
 				if (unlikely(crypto_memneq(digest, dio->integrity_payload + pos,
 						min(ic->internal_hash_digestsize, ic->tag_size)))) {
 					integrity_kunmap(ic, mem);
@@ -2899,9 +2911,12 @@ static void do_journal_write(struct dm_i
 #endif
 				    ic->internal_hash) {
 					char test_tag[MAX_T(size_t, HASH_MAX_DIGESTSIZE, MAX_TAG_SIZE)];
+					struct journal_sector *js = access_journal_data(ic, i, l);
+					void *js_page = integrity_identity(ic, (char *)js - offset_in_page(js));
+					unsigned js_offset = offset_in_page(js);
 
 					integrity_sector_checksum(ic, sec + ((l - j) << ic->sb->log2_sectors_per_block),
-								  (char *)access_journal_data(ic, i, l), test_tag);
+								  js_page, js_offset, test_tag);
 					if (unlikely(crypto_memneq(test_tag, journal_entry_tag(ic, je2), ic->tag_size))) {
 						dm_integrity_io_error(ic, "tag mismatch when replaying journal", -EILSEQ);
 						dm_audit_log_target(DM_MSG_PREFIX, "integrity-replay-journal", ic->ti, 0);
@@ -3094,7 +3109,10 @@ next_chunk:
 
 	t = recalc_tags;
 	for (i = 0; i < n_sectors; i += ic->sectors_per_block) {
-		integrity_sector_checksum(ic, logical_sector + i, recalc_buffer + (i << SECTOR_SHIFT), t);
+		void *ptr = recalc_buffer + (i << SECTOR_SHIFT);
+		void *ptr_page = integrity_identity(ic, (char *)ptr - offset_in_page(ptr));
+		unsigned ptr_offset = offset_in_page(ptr);
+		integrity_sector_checksum(ic, logical_sector + i, ptr_page, ptr_offset, t);
 		t += ic->tag_size;
 	}
 
@@ -3214,8 +3232,11 @@ next_chunk:
 
 	t = recalc_tags;
 	for (i = 0; i < range.n_sectors; i += ic->sectors_per_block) {
+		void *ptr = recalc_buffer + (i << SECTOR_SHIFT);
+		void *ptr_page = integrity_identity(ic, (char *)ptr - offset_in_page(ptr));
+		unsigned ptr_offset = offset_in_page(ptr);
 		memset(t, 0, ic->tuple_size);
-		integrity_sector_checksum(ic, range.logical_sector + i, recalc_buffer + (i << SECTOR_SHIFT), t);
+		integrity_sector_checksum(ic, range.logical_sector + i, ptr_page, ptr_offset, t);
 		t += ic->tuple_size;
 	}
 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-08 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-08 13:16 [PATCH v2 0/7] dm-integrity: asynchronous hash support Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-08 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] dm-integrity: use internal variable for digestsize Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-08 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] dm-integrity: replace bvec_kmap_local with kmap_local_page Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-08 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] dm-integrity: introduce integrity_kmap and integrity_kunmap Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-08 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] dm-integrity: allocate the recalculate buffer with kmalloc Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-08 13:16 ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2025-09-08 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] dm-integrity: rename internal_hash Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-08 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] dm-integrity: enable asynchronous hash interface Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-09  9:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] dm-integrity: asynchronous hash support Ingo Franzki
2025-09-09  9:42   ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-09 11:18     ` Ingo Franzki
2025-09-09 11:47       ` Milan Broz
2025-09-09 11:50         ` Ingo Franzki
2025-09-09 12:15           ` Milan Broz
2025-09-09 12:23             ` Ingo Franzki
2025-09-09 12:40               ` Milan Broz
2025-09-09 13:51             ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-09-09 14:12               ` Milan Broz
2025-09-11 13:43       ` Ingo Franzki
2025-09-11 15:58         ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-12  8:08           ` Ingo Franzki
2025-09-15  9:26             ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-09-18 15:00           ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-09-19  6:53             ` Ingo Franzki
2025-09-22 19:08             ` [PATCH] crypto/authenc: don't return -EBUSY when enqueuing the hash request Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-23  3:47               ` Herbert Xu
2025-09-23 11:14                 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-23 14:36                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-23 15:17                   ` Herbert Xu
2025-09-24 10:20                     ` [PATCH] crypto: authenc - Correctly pass EINPROGRESS back up to the caller Herbert Xu
2025-09-24 13:17                       ` Ingo Franzki
2025-11-25 14:02                     ` [PATCH] crypto/authenc: don't return -EBUSY when enqueuing the hash request Mikulas Patocka
2025-11-26  5:16                       ` Herbert Xu
2025-09-09 13:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] dm-integrity: asynchronous hash support Harald Freudenberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250908131800.256419720@debian4.vm \
    --to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dengler@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=ifranzki@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.