From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Calvin Owens <calvin@wbinvd.org>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
david decotigny <decot@googlers.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, asantostc@gmail.com,
efault@gmx.de, kernel-team@meta.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
jv@jvosburgh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/3] netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing incorrect cleanup
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 18:29:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250908182958.23dc4ba0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aL9A3JDyx3TxAzLf@mozart.vkv.me>
On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:47:24 -0700 Calvin Owens wrote:
> I wonder if there might be a demon lurking in bonding+netpoll that this
> was papering over? Not a reason not to fix the leaks IMO, I'm just
> curious, I don't want to spend time on it if you already did :)
+1, I also feel like it'd be good to have some bonding tests in place
when we're removing a hack added specifically for bonding.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-05 17:25 [PATCH net v3 0/3] net: netpoll: fix a memleak and create a selftest Breno Leitao
2025-09-05 17:25 ` [PATCH net v3 1/3] netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing incorrect cleanup Breno Leitao
2025-09-08 10:12 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-08 20:47 ` Calvin Owens
2025-09-09 1:29 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-09-09 20:17 ` Breno Leitao
2025-09-09 23:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-10 14:12 ` Breno Leitao
2025-09-10 17:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-10 18:50 ` Breno Leitao
2025-09-10 0:18 ` Jay Vosburgh
2025-09-10 14:07 ` Breno Leitao
2025-09-09 14:05 ` Breno Leitao
2025-09-10 0:40 ` Calvin Owens
2025-09-05 17:25 ` [PATCH net v3 2/3] selftest: netcons: refactor target creation Breno Leitao
2025-09-05 17:27 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-08 10:13 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-05 17:25 ` [PATCH net v3 3/3] selftest: netcons: create a torture test Breno Leitao
2025-09-08 10:13 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250908182958.23dc4ba0@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=asantostc@gmail.com \
--cc=calvin@wbinvd.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=decot@googlers.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.