All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	jolsa@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, dxu@dxuuu.xyz, deso@posteo.net,
	leon.hwang@linux.dev, kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/7] bpf: Introduce internal bpf_map_check_op_flags helper function
Date: Tue,  9 Sep 2025 22:14:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250909141422.45450-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909141422.45450-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>

It is to unify map flags checking for lookup_elem, update_elem,
lookup_batch and update_batch APIs.

Therefore, it will be convenient to check BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS
flags in it for these APIs in next patch.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 3f178a0f8eb12..f5448e00a2e8f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -131,6 +131,17 @@ bool bpf_map_write_active(const struct bpf_map *map)
 	return atomic64_read(&map->writecnt) != 0;
 }
 
+static int bpf_map_check_op_flags(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, u64 allowed_flags)
+{
+	if (flags & ~allowed_flags)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if ((flags & BPF_F_LOCK) && !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static u32 bpf_map_value_size(const struct bpf_map *map)
 {
 	if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH ||
@@ -1669,9 +1680,6 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (attr->flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	CLASS(fd, f)(attr->map_fd);
 	map = __bpf_map_get(f);
 	if (IS_ERR(map))
@@ -1679,9 +1687,9 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (!(map_get_sys_perms(map, f) & FMODE_CAN_READ))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	if ((attr->flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
-	    !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->flags, BPF_F_LOCK);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	key = __bpf_copy_key(ukey, map->key_size);
 	if (IS_ERR(key))
@@ -1744,11 +1752,9 @@ static int map_update_elem(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
 		goto err_put;
 	}
 
-	if ((attr->flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
-	    !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK)) {
-		err = -EINVAL;
+	err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->flags, ~0);
+	if (err)
 		goto err_put;
-	}
 
 	key = ___bpf_copy_key(ukey, map->key_size);
 	if (IS_ERR(key)) {
@@ -1952,13 +1958,9 @@ int generic_map_update_batch(struct bpf_map *map, struct file *map_file,
 	void *key, *value;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (attr->batch.elem_flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if ((attr->batch.elem_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
-	    !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK)) {
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
+	err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags, BPF_F_LOCK);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
 
@@ -2015,12 +2017,9 @@ int generic_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
 	u32 value_size, cp, max_count;
 	int err;
 
-	if (attr->batch.elem_flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if ((attr->batch.elem_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
-	    !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags, BPF_F_LOCK);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
 
-- 
2.50.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-09 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-09 14:14 [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-09 14:14 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2025-09-09 14:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
2025-09-09 23:07   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-10  2:20     ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-09 14:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-09 14:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-09 14:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-09 14:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 6/7] libbpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-09 14:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add cases to test BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250909141422.45450-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=deso@posteo.net \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.