All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>,
	Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>,
	Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Ying Huang <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>,
	Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@amd.com>,
	Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>,
	"Benjamin Cheatham" <benjamin.cheatham@amd.com>,
	PradeepVineshReddy Kodamati <PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com>,
	Zhijian Li <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] dax/hmem: Reintroduce Soft Reserved ranges back into the iomem tree
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 14:41:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250910144136.000002e2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250822034202.26896-6-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>

On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 03:42:01 +0000
Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com> wrote:

> Reworked from a patch by Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> 
> Reintroduce Soft Reserved range into the iomem_resource tree for dax_hmem
> to consume.
> 
> This restores visibility in /proc/iomem for ranges actively in use, while
> avoiding the early-boot conflicts that occurred when Soft Reserved was
> published into iomem before CXL window and region discovery.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/29312c0765224ae76862d59a17748c8188fb95f1.1692638817.git.alison.schofield@intel.com/
> Co-developed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
A few trivial things inline. Not are important enough to need a change though.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
>  drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c b/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c
> index 90978518e5f4..24a6e7e3d916 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,40 @@ static void process_defer_work(struct work_struct *_work)
>  	walk_hmem_resources(&pdev->dev, handle_deferred_cxl);
>  }
>  
> +static void remove_soft_reserved(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct resource *r = data;
> +
> +	remove_resource(r);

Type doesn't really help us here so why not skip the local variable.
	remove_resource(data);
	kfree(data);

Though I'd rename data to r.

> +	kfree(r);
> +}
> +
> +static int add_soft_reserve_into_iomem(struct device *host,
> +				       const struct resource *res)
> +{
> +	struct resource *soft = kzalloc(sizeof(*soft), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	if (!soft)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	*soft = DEFINE_RES_NAMED_DESC(res->start, (res->end - res->start + 1),
> +				      "Soft Reserved", IORESOURCE_MEM,
> +				      IORES_DESC_SOFT_RESERVED);
> +
> +	rc = insert_resource(&iomem_resource, soft);
> +	if (rc) {
> +		kfree(soft);

Could use __free() magic here and steal the pointer when you setup the
devm action below.  Only a small simplification in this case, so up to
you.

> +		return rc;
> +	}
> +
> +	rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(host, remove_soft_reserved, soft);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	return 0;

Trivial:

	return dev_add_action_or_reset(host...)

> +}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-10 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-22  3:41 [PATCH 0/6] dax/hmem, cxl: Coordinate Soft Reserved handling with CXL Smita Koralahalli
2025-08-22  3:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] dax/hmem, e820, resource: Defer Soft Reserved registration until hmem is ready Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-01  2:59   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-09-30  4:01     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-09-08 23:01   ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-11 19:39     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-09-25 18:17       ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-09 16:12   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-30  4:56     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-12-18 17:52     ` dan.j.williams
2026-01-13 18:29       ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-22  3:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] dax/hmem: Request cxl_acpi and cxl_pci before walking Soft Reserved ranges Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-01  3:08   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-09-04 17:35   ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-22  3:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] dax/hmem, cxl: Tighten dependencies on DEV_DAX_CXL and dax_hmem Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-01  3:28   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-09-30  4:04     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-08-22  3:42 ` [PATCH 4/6] dax/hmem: Defer Soft Reserved overlap handling until CXL region assembly completes Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-01  4:01   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-08-22  3:42 ` [PATCH 5/6] dax/hmem: Reintroduce Soft Reserved ranges back into the iomem tree Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-04 18:14   ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 13:41   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-09-30  4:03     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-08-22  3:42 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] cxl/region, dax/hmem: Guard CXL DAX region creation and tighten HMEM deps Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-01  6:21   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-09-30  4:06     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-08-26 23:21 ` [PATCH 0/6] dax/hmem, cxl: Coordinate Soft Reserved handling with CXL Alison Schofield
2025-08-28 23:34   ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250910144136.000002e2@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=benjamin.cheatham@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
    --cc=nathan.fontenot@amd.com \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pavel@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rrichter@amd.com \
    --cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.